Chapter 13
Real Options and Other Topics in
Capital Budgeting
Identifying Embedded Options
Valuing Real Options in Projects
13-1
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
What is real option analysis?
•
Real options exist when managers can influence the
size and riskiness of a project’s cash flows by taking
different actions during or at the end of a project’s
life.
•
Real option analysis incorporates typical NPV capital
budgeting analysis with an analysis of opportunities
resulting from managers’ responses to changing
circumstances that can influence a project’s
outcome.
13-2
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
What are some examples of real options?
•
•
•
•
Growth/expansion options
Abandonment/shutdown options
Investment timing options
Flexibility options
13-3
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Investment Timing Option
•
Project X has an up-front cost of $100,000. The
project is expected to produce cash flows of
$33,500 at the end of each of the next four years
(t = 1, 2, 3, and 4). The project has a WACC = 10%.
•
The project’s NPV is $6,190. Therefore, it appears
that the company should go ahead with the project.
•
However, if the company waits a year they will find
out more information about market conditions and
the impact on the project’s expected cash flows.
13-4
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Investment Timing Option
•
If they wait a year:
– There is a 50% chance the market will be strong and
–
–
•
the expected cash flows will be $43,500 a year for
four years.
There is a 50% chance the market will be weak and
the expected cash flows will be $23,500 a year for
four years.
The project’s initial cost will remain $100,000, but it
will be incurred at t = 1 only if it makes sense at that
time to proceed with the project.
Should the company go ahead with the project
today or wait for more information?
13-5
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Investment Timing Decision Tree
50% prob.
50% prob.
•
0
-$100,000
43,500
43,500
43,500
43,500
-$100,000
23,500
23,500
23,500
23,500
2
3
4
5
1
Years
At WACC = 10%, the NPV at t = 1 is:
– $37,889, if CF’s are $43,500 per year, or
– -$25,508, if CF’s are $23,500 per year, in which case
the firm would not proceed with the project.
13-6
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Should we wait or proceed?
•
•
If we proceed today, NPV = $6,190.
•
Therefore, it makes sense to wait.
If we wait one year, Expected NPV at t = 1 is
0.5($37,889) + 0.5(0) = $18,944.57, which is worth
$18,944.57/1.10 = $17,222.34 in today’s dollars
(assuming a 10% WACC).
13-7
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Issues to Consider with Investment Timing Options
•
•
What is the appropriate discount rate?
Note that increased volatility makes the option to
delay more attractive.
– If instead, there was a 50% chance the subsequent
CFs will be $53,500 a year, and a 50% chance the
subsequent CFs will be $13,500 a year, expected NPV
next year (if we delay) would be:
t = 1: 0.5($69,588) + 0.5(0) = $34,794 > $18,945
t = 0: $34,794/1.10 = $31,631 > $17,222
13-8
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Factors to Consider In Decision of When to Invest
•
Delaying the project means that cash flows come
later rather than sooner.
•
It might make sense to proceed today if there are
important advantages to being the first competitor
to enter a market.
•
Waiting may allow you to take advantage of
changing conditions.
13-9
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Abandonment/Shutdown Option
•
Project Y has an initial, up-front cost of $200,000, at
t = 0. The project is expected to produce cash flows
of $80,000 for the next three years.
•
At a 10% WACC, what is Project Y’s NPV?
0
10%
-$200,000
1
80,000
2
80,000
3
80,000
NPV = -$1,051.84
13-10
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Abandonment Option
•
Project Y’s cash flows depend critically upon
customer acceptance of the product.
•
There is a 60% probability that the product will be
wildly successful and produce CFs of $150,000, and
a 40% chance it will produce annual CFs of
−$25,000.
13-11
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Abandonment Decision Tree
60% prob.
-$200,000
40% prob.
0
•
•
150,000
150,000
150,000
-25,000
-25,000
-25,000
1
2
3
Years
If the customer uses the product, NPV is
$173,027.80.
If the customer does not use the product, NPV is
-$262,171.30.
E(NPV) = 0.6($173,027.8) + 0.4(−$262,171.3)
= −$1,051.84
13-12
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Issues with Abandonment Options
•
The company does not have the option to delay the
project.
•
The company may abandon the project after a year,
if the customer has not adopted the product.
•
If the project is abandoned, there will be no
operating costs incurred nor cash inflows received
after the first year.
13-13
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
NPV with Abandonment Option
60% prob.
-$200,000
40% prob.
0
•
•
150,000
150,000
150,000
2
3
-25,000
1
Years
If the customer uses the product, NPV is $173,027.80.
If the customer does not use the product and it can be
abandoned after Year 1, NPV is −$222,727.27.
E(NPV) = 0.6($173,027.8) + 0.4(−$222,727.27)
= $14 ,725.77
13-14
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Should an abandonment option affect a
project’s WACC?
•
Yes, an abandonment option should have an effect
on the WACC.
•
The abandonment option reduces risk, and
therefore reduces the WACC.
13-15
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Growth Option
•
•
Project Z has an initial cost of $500,000.
•
There is a 10% chance the project will lead to
subsequent opportunities that have an NPV of
$3,000,000 at t = 5, and a 90% chance of an NPV of
-$1,000,000 at t = 5.
The project is expected to produce cash flows of
$100,000 at the end of each of the next five years,
and has a WACC of 12%. It clearly has a negative
NPV.
13-16
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
NPV with the Growth Option
100,000 100,000
10% prob.
-$500,000
90% prob.
•
0
100,000 100,000
1
2
100,000
$3,000,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
-$1,000,000
100,000
100,000
3
4
5 Years
At WACC = 12%,
– NPV of top branch (10% prob.) = $1,562,758.19
– NPV of lower branch (90% prob.) = -$139,522.38
13-17
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
NPV with the Growth Option
•
If the project’s future opportunities have a negative
NPV, the company would choose not to pursue
them.
•
The bottom branch only has the -$500,000 initial
outlay and the $100,000 annual cash flows, which
lead to an NPV of -$139,522.
•
The expected NPV of this project is:
NPV = 0.1($1,562,758) + 0.9(-$139,522)
= $30,706.
13-18
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Flexibility Options
•
Flexibility options exist when it’s worth spending
money today, which enables you to maintain
flexibility down the road.
13-19
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.