Management of heart failure in the elderly:
what I should know?
Professor Andrew Coats
Joint Academic Vice-President and
Director, Monash-Warwick Alliance
The ageing world
www.un.org/esa/socdev/ageing/agewpop1.htm
Detecting Heart Failure in The Population
The Hillingdon Study
Cowie, Wood, Coats, Poole-Wilson, Thompson, Suresh, Sutton
• Population of 151,000 in
West London
• 82 GP’s
• Rapid access HF clinic
• Survey of all admissions to
local hospital
• 20 month study
Elderly HF Patients are not like
younger HF patients
They have more co-morbidities
Co-Morbidity in Elderly Patients with Heart
Failure
Hypertension
Diabetes
COPD
Ocular disorders
Hypercholest.
Atherosclerosis
55
31
26
24
21
20
19
Arthritis
COPD
Thyroid disorders
Complicated HBP
Alzheimer's
14
14
11
9
8
7
Depression
Renal failure
0
N=122,630
10
20
30
% of patients
40
50
60
Braunstein et al., J Am Coll Cardiol 2003
Clinical Characteristics of HF Patients According
to Age
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Renal dysfunction
Atrial Fibrillation
p<0.001
p<0.001
32
25
19
10
40
% patients
% patients
IMPROVEMENT Study
30
20
25
31
36
16
10
0
<65 65-74 75-84 >84
<65 65-74 75-84 >84
Years
Years
Muntwyler et al., Eur J Heart Fail 2004
Elderly HF Patients are not like
younger HF patients
The pathophysiology is different
Clinical Characteristics of HF Patients According
to Age
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
62
Male Sex
Concomitant CAD
p<0.001
p<0.001
54
50
43
31
% patients
% patients
IMPROVEMENT Study
40
46
43
37
30
23
20
10
0
<65 65-74 75-84 >84
<65 65-74 75-84 >84
Years
Years
n=8256
Muntwyler et al., Eur J Heart Fail 2004
Two Types of Heart Failure
Heart Failure with reduced left
ventricular systolic function
Heart Failure with preserved left
ventricular systolic function
Euroheart Failure: Distribution of ejection
fraction
11,015 patients in 115 hospitals in 24 countries
Percentage of patients
14
Women
Men
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
<10 10- 15- 20- 25- 30- 35- 40- 45- 50- 55- 60- 65- 70- 7514 19 24 29 34 39 44 49 54 59 64 69 74 80
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (%)
Cleland et al Euroheart Survey EHJ 2003
HF with preserved Ejection Fraction
(HFPEF) According to Age!
Prevalence (%)
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
<50
50-70
>70 yrs
Zile, Brutsaert, Circulation 2002
The Treatment is Different
Elderly Patients are not treated like younger
patients
Beta-Blocker Prescribing in HF Patients
According to Age
IMPROVEMENT Study
Females
Males
p<0.001
80
60
40
44
31
23
20
p<0.001
100
14
0
% patients
% patients
100
80
60
40
35
31
23
20
12
0
<65 65-74 75-84 >84
<65 65-74 75-84 >84
Years
Years
Muntwyler et al., Eur J Heart Fail 2004b
BRING UP
Reasons for Not Commencing ß-Blockade
On
blockers
(n = 771)
blockers
started
(n = 865)
No
blockers
(n = 1455)
P value
Age 70 years
NYHA III-IV
24%
25%
43%
0.001
26%
29%
42%
0.001
Pulmonary rales
10%
20%
26%
0.001
Periph. oedema
12%
13%
21%
0.001
Atrial
fibrillation
14%
17%
21%
0.001
EF not available
5%
3%
6%
0.008
EF < 30%
30%
30%
35%
0.017
Maggioni A et al. Heart 2003
TEMISTOCLE
(hearT failurE epideMIological STudy FADOI-ANMCO in itaLian pEople)
69% pts (1468 /2127) aged >70 years
7.7% (114 /2127) on BB at discharge
Reasons why BB-Therapy was not started
PVD
Absence of indication
AVBlock >2° HR<50 bpm
Diabetes
Hypotension
Other
NYHA IV
COPD
Advanced age >75 yr
1.1%
1.5%
3.0%
3.5%
4.0%
10.4%
11.4%
37.2%
43.8%
Di Lenarda et al. Am Heart J. 2003
N=1354
The evidence isn’t there
Mean Age in Multicentre HF Trials
Trial
CONSENSUS I
# Patients
Mean Age
253
71
SOLVD-T
6 797
61
DIG
7 788
63
MERIT-HF
3 991
64
CIBIS-II
2 647
61
COPERNICUS
2 289
63
RALES
1 633
61
EPHESUS
6 642
64
ELITE-II
3 152
71
Val-HeFT
5 010
62
CHARM
7 601
66
ACE inhibitors in heart failure
n Approximately 7000 patients
evaluated in placebo-controlled
clinical trials
n Consistent improvement in cardiac
function, symptoms and clinical
status
n Decrease in all-cause mortality by
20–25% (p<0.001)
n Decrease in combined risk of death
and hospitalisation by 20–25%
(p<0.001)
Effect of ACE Inhibitors on Outcomes in
HF Patients According to Age
No of events/No of patients
495/3165
Deaths
<55
Age
(years)
55-64
994/4315
65-75
1227/4194
>75
454/1066
Death/CHF/MI
<55
Age
(years)
878/3165
55-64
1534/4315
65-75
1761/4194
>75
590/1066
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Risk ratio (95% CI)
1.2
1.4
Flather M et al., Lancet 2000
blockers in heart failure
n Over 13 000 patients evaluated in
placebo-controlled clinical trials
n Consistent improvement in cardiac
function, symptoms and clinical status
n Decrease in all-cause mortality by 30–
35% (p<0.0001)
n Decrease in combined risk of death and
hospitalisation by 25–30% (p<0.0001)
Trials of treatment in heart failure
recruiting an elderly cohort
Trial
Intervention Primary EP
Result
ELITE (722, >65 yrs)
Los vs. Cap
Renal Function
Not Sig
ELITE-II (3152, >60 yrs)
Los vs. Cap
Death
Not Sig
SENIORS (2135, >70 yrs)
Nebivolol
Death or HF Hosp Reduced 14%,
p = 0.039
PEP-CHF (850, >70 yrs)
Perindopril
Death or HF Hosp Not Sig
I-PRESERVE (4128, >60 yrs)
Irbesartan
Death or CV Hosp Not Sig
The SENIORS Trial
• Randomised, Double blind, Placebo controlled trial of
Nebivolol
• Age 70 years with a clinical diagnosis of CHF and either
of:
a) documented LVEF 35% within 6/12
or
b) HF hospital admission within 1 year
• Primary end-point: Combined all-cause mortality and
cardiovascular hospital admission (time to first event)
• Placebo n=1061, Nebivolol n=1067
Treatment Doses Achieved
Nebivolol
Placebo
(n=1067)
7.7
(n=1061)
8.5
815 (80.4%)
688 (67.9%)
881 (87.1%)
805 (79.5%)
Patient-years of follow-up
1863
1839
Median follow-up months
20.4
19.9
Mean treatment dose, mg
Maintenance dose level achieved:
≥ 5 mg
10 mg
Nebivolol
(n = 1067)
Placebo
(n = 1061)
Nebivolol: 332 events (31.1%)
Placebo: 375 events (35.3%)