Tải bản đầy đủ (.pptx) (50 trang)

Management 13th edtion by schermerhorn bachrach chapter 11

Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (1.7 MB, 50 trang )

11

John R. Schermerhorn, Jr.
Daniel G. Bachrach

Management
13th edition
CHAPTER 11
ORGANIZATIONAL
STRUCTURES AND DESIGN


PLANNING AHEAD — KEY TAKEAWAYS
 Describe

organizing as a management function
and the difference between formal and informal
organization structures.
 Identify the traditional organizational structures,
and the strengths and weaknesses of each.
 Identify newer horizontal organizational structures,
and the strengths and weaknesses of each.
 Explain how organizational designs are changing
in the modern workplace.

Copyright ©2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.


CHAPTER 11 OUTLINE
1.


Organizing as a Management Function
a)
b)
c)

2.

What is organization structure?
Formal structures
Informal structures

Traditional Organization Structures
a)
b)
c)

Functional structures
Divisional structures
Matrix structures

Copyright ©2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.


CHAPTER 11 OUTLINE
3.

Horizontal Organization Structures
a)
b)
c)


4.

Team structures
Network structures
Boundaryless structures

Organizational Designs
a)
b)
c)

Contingency in organizational design
Mechanistic and organic organization
designs
Trends in organizational designs

Copyright ©2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.


ORGANIZING AS A MANAGEMENT
FUNCTION
 Organizing

as a management function

Organizing


Arranges people and resources to work together to

accomplish a goal

Organization


structure

The system of tasks, reporting relationships, and
communication linkages

Copyright ©2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.


FIGURE 11.1 ORGANIZING VIEWED IN
RELATIONSHIP WITH THE OTHER
MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS

Copyright ©2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.


ORGANIZING AS A MANAGEMENT
FUNCTION
 An

organization chart is a diagram describing
reporting relationships and the formal
arrangement of work positions within an
organization. It includes:

The division of work


Supervisory
relationships

Communication
channels

Major subunits

Levels of management

Copyright ©2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.


ORGANIZING AS A MANAGEMENT
FUNCTION
 Informal

structures 

The

set of unofficial relationships between
organization members
Social network analysis


Identifies informal structures and social
relationships in the organization


Copyright ©2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.


ORGANIZING AS A MANAGEMENT
FUNCTION
 Informal

structures and social networks

Potential

advantages of informal structures:

Allow people to make contacts with others who can
help them get things done
 Stimulate learning as people work and interact
together
 Sources of emotional support and friendship that
satisfy members’ social needs


Copyright ©2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.


ORGANIZING AS A MANAGEMENT
FUNCTION
Potential disadvantages of informal structures:

Presence of
“In and out

groups”

Susceptibility
to rumor

May carry
inaccurate
information

May breed
resistance to
change

Diversion of
work efforts
from
important
objectives

Feeling of
alienation by
outsiders

Copyright ©2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.


TRADITIONAL ORGANIZATION
STRUCTURES
 Traditional


Functional

organization structures

Divisional

Matrix

Copyright ©2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.


TRADITIONAL ORGANIZATION
STRUCTURES

 Functional

structures

People

with similar skills and performing
similar tasks are grouped together into formal
work units
Members work in their functional areas of
expertise
Are not limited to businesses
Work well for small organizations producing
few products or services

Copyright ©2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.



FIGURE 11.2 FUNCTIONAL STRUCTURES IN A
BUSINESS, BRANCH BANK, AND COMMUNITY
HOSPITAL

Copyright ©2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.


TRADITIONAL ORGANIZATION
STRUCTURES

 Potential

advantages of functional
structures:
Economies

of scale
Task assignments consistent with expertise
and training
High-quality technical problem solving
In-depth training and skill development
Clear career paths within functions

Copyright ©2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.


TRADITIONAL ORGANIZATION
STRUCTURES

Potential disadvantages of functional structures:
Difficulties in pinpointing
responsibilities

Functional chimneys
problem
• Sense of cooperation and common
purpose break down
• Narrow view of performance
objectives

Copyright ©2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.


TRADITIONAL ORGANIZATION
STRUCTURES

 Divisional

structures

Group

together people who work on the same
product or process, serve similar customers,
and/or are located in the same area or
geographical region
Common in complex organizations
Avoid problems associated with functional
structures


Copyright ©2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.


FIGURE 11.3 DIVISIONAL STRUCTURES BASED ON
PRODUCT, GEOGRAPHY, CUSTOMER, AND
PROCESS

Copyright ©2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.


TRADITIONAL ORGANIZATION
STRUCTURES

 Potential

advantages of divisional
structures:
More

flexibility in responding to environmental
changes
Improved coordination
Clear points of responsibility
Expertise focused on specific customers,
products, and regions
Greater ease in restructuring

Copyright ©2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.



TRADITIONAL ORGANIZATION
STRUCTURES
Potential disadvantages of divisional structures:
Duplication of
resources and
efforts across
divisions

Competition and
poor
coordination
across divisions

Emphasis on
divisional goals
at expense of
organizational
goals

Copyright ©2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.


TRADITIONAL ORGANIZATION
STRUCTURES
 Matrix structure
Combines

functional and divisional structures
to gain advantages and minimize

disadvantages of each
Used in:

Manufacturing

Service industries Professional fields Non-profit sector

Multi-national
corporations

Copyright ©2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.


FIGURE 11.4 MATRIX STRUCTURE IN A
SMALL, MULTI-PROJECT BUSINESS FIRM

Copyright ©2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.


TRADITIONAL ORGANIZATION
STRUCTURES

 Potential

advantages of matrix structures:

Better

cooperation across functions
Improved decision making

Increased flexibility in restructuring
Better customer service
Better performance accountability
Improved strategic management

Copyright ©2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.


TRADITIONAL ORGANIZATION
STRUCTURES
Potential disadvantages of matrix structures:
Two-boss
Two-boss
system can
Team
system is
create task
meetings are
susceptible to confusion and
time
power
conflict in
consuming
struggles
work
priorities

Team may
develop
“groupitis ”


Increased
costs due to
adding team
leaders to
structure

Copyright ©2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.


HORIZONTAL ORGANIZATION
STRUCTURES

 Team

structures

Extensively

use permanent and temporary
teams to solve problems, complete special
projects, and accomplish day-to-day tasks
Often use cross-functional teams composed
of members from different functional
departments
Project teams are convened for a specific
task or project and disbanded once
completed
Copyright ©2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.



FIGURE 11.5 HOW A TEAM STRUCTURE USES
CROSS-FUNCTIONAL TEAMS FOR IMPROVED
LATERAL RELATIONS

Copyright ©2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.


×