To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit
CHAPTER 26
Incremental Analysis and Capital Budgeting
ASSIGNMENT CLASSIFICATION TABLE
Study Objectives
Questions
Brief
Exercises
Do It!
Exercises
1.
Identify the steps
in management’s
decision-making process.
1, 2
1
3
1
2.
Describe the concept
of incremental analysis.
3, 4
2
4
1
3.
Identify the relevant
costs in accepting an
order at a special price.
5
3
7
4.
Identify the relevant costs
in a make-or-buy decision.
6, 7
4
5.
Give the decision rule
for whether to sell or
process materials further.
8
5
6.
Identify the factors to
consider in retaining or
replacing equipment.
9
6
7
7.
Explain the relevant
factors in whether to
eliminate an unprofitable
segment.
10
7
8, 9
8.
Determine which products
to make and sell when
resources are limited.
11
8
10
9.
Contrast annual rate of
return and cash payback
in capital budgeting.
12, 13, 14,
15, 16
9, 10
11, 12, 13
Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
A
Problems
B
Problems
2, 3
1A
1B
9
4
2A
2B
10
5, 6
3A
3B
4A, 5A
4B, 5B
Weygandt, Accounting Principles, 9/e, Solutions Manual
(For Instructor Use Only)
26-1
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit
ASSIGNMENT CLASSIFICATION TABLE (Continued)
Study Objectives
Questions
10.
17, 18, 19,
20
26-2
Distinguish between
the net present value
and internal rate of
return methods.
Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Brief
Exercises
11, 12, 13
Do It!
Exercises
12, 13, 14,
15
A
Problems
B
Problems
4A, 5A, 6A
4B, 5B, 6B
Weygandt, Accounting Principles, 9/e, Solutions Manual
(For Instructor Use Only)
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit
ASSIGNMENT CHARACTERISTICS TABLE
Problem
Number
Description
Difficulty
Level
Time
Allotted (min.)
Simple
20–30
1A
Make incremental analysis for special order, and identify
nonfinancial factors in decision.
2A
Make incremental analysis related to make or buy; consider
opportunity cost, and identify nonfinancial factors.
Moderate
30–40
3A
Compute contribution margin, and prepare incremental
analysis concerning elimination of divisions.
Moderate
30–40
4A
Compute annual rate of return, cash payback, and net
present value.
Moderate
30–40
5A
Compute annual rate of return, cash payback, and net
present value.
Complex
30–40
6A
Compute net present value and internal rate of return.
Moderate
20–30
1B
Make incremental analysis for special order, and identify
nonfinancial factors in decision.
Simple
20–30
2B
Make incremental analysis related to make or buy; consider
opportunity cost, and identify nonfinancial factors.
Moderate
30–40
3B
Compute contribution margin, and prepare incremental
analysis concerning elimination of divisions.
Moderate
30–40
4B
Compute annual rate of return, cash payback, and net
present value.
Moderate
30–40
5B
Compute annual rate of return, cash payback, and net
Present value.
Complex
30–40
6B
Compute net present value and internal rate of return.
Moderate
20–30
Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Weygandt, Accounting Principles, 9/e, Solutions Manual
(For Instructor Use Only)
26-3
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit
WEYGANDT ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES 9E
CHAPTER 26
INCREMENTAL ANALYSIS AND CAPITAL BUDGETING
Number
SO
BT
Difficulty
Time (min.)
BE1
1
K
Simple
2–3
BE2
2
AN
Simple
3–5
BE3
3
AN
Simple
4–6
BE4
4
AN
Simple
5–7
BE5
5
AN
Simple
5–7
BE6
6
AN
Simple
4–6
BE7
7
AN
Simple
4–6
BE8
8
AP
Simple
3–5
BE9
9
AP
Simple
4–6
BE10
9
AP
Simple
5–7
BE11
10
AN
Simple
5–7
BE12
10
AP
Simple
4–6
BE13
10
AN
Simple
2–4
DI1
3
AN
Simple
4–6
DI2
4
AN
Simple
8–10
DI3
7
AN
Simple
6–8
DI4
9
AP
Simple
6–8
DI5
10
AN
Simple
6–8
EX1
1, 2
K
Simple
8–10
EX2
3
E
Moderate
8–10
EX3
3
E
Simple
8–10
EX4
4
E
Simple
8–10
EX5
5
E
Moderate
10–12
EX6
5
E
Simple
8–10
EX7
6
E
Simple
6–8
EX8
7
E
Simple
6–8
EX9
7
E
Simple
8–10
EX10
8
E
Simple
8–10
26-4
Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Weygandt, Accounting Principles, 9/e, Solutions Manual
(For Instructor Use Only)
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit
INCREMENTAL ANALYSIS AND CAPITAL BUDGETING (Continued)
Number
SO
BT
Difficulty
Time (min.)
EX11
9
AP
Moderate
8–10
EX12
9, 10
E
Moderate
12–15
EX13
9, 10
AP
Simple
6–8
EX14
10
E
Simple
8–10
EX15
10
E
Simple
8–10
PIA
3
E
Simple
20–30
P2A
4
E
Moderate
30–40
P3A
7
E
Moderate
30–40
P4A
9, 10
E
Moderate
30–40
P5A
9, 10
E
Complex
30–40
P6A
10
E
Moderate
20–30
P1B
3
E
Simple
20–30
P2B
4
E
Moderate
30–40
P3B
7
E
Moderate
30–40
P4B
9, 10
E
Moderate
30–40
P5B
9, 10
E
Complex
30–40
P6B
10
E
Moderate
20–30
BYP1
6, 9, 10
AP, AN
Moderate
20–25
BYP2
4
E
Moderate
10–15
BYP3
2
AN
Simple
8–12
BYP4
10
AP
Simple
10–15
BYP5
9
E
Moderate
15–20
BYP6
2, 7
E
Simple
10–15
BYP7
1, 2
S
Simple
25–30
Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Weygandt, Accounting Principles, 9/e, Solutions Manual
(For Instructor Use Only)
26-5
26-6
Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Describe the concept of incremental
analysis.
Identify the relevant costs in accepting
an order at a special price.
Identify the relevant costs in a makeor-buy decision.
Give the decision rule for whether to
sell or process materials further.
Identify the factors to consider in
retaining or replacing equipment.
Explain the relevant factors in whether
to eliminate an unprofitable segment.
Determine which products to make
and sell when resources are limited.
Contrast annual rate of return and
cash payback in capital budgeting.
Distinguish between the net present
value and internal rate of return
methods.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Broadening Your Perspective
Identify the steps in management’s
decision-making process.
1.
Study Objective
BE26-8
E26-11
E26-13
BE26-12
E26-13
Q26-17
Q26-18
Q26-19
Q26-20
Exploring the Web
Decision Making
Across the
Organization
Q26-16 BE26-9
BE26-10
DI26-4
Q26-12
Q26-14
Q26-15
Synthesis
E26-12
E26-14
E26-15
P26-4A
P26-5A
E26-12
P26-4A
P26-5A
E26-10
E26-8
E26-9
E26-7
E26-5
E26-6
E26-4
P26-2A
E26-2
E26-3
P26-6A
P26-4B
P26-5B
P26-6B
P26-4B
P26-5B
P26-3A
P26-3B
P26-2B
P26-1A
P26-1B
Evaluation
Decision Making All About Managerial Analysis
You
Decision Making
Across the
Across the
Organization
Activity
Organization
Real-World
Communication
Focus
Ethics Case
BE26-11
BE26-13
DI26-5
BE26-7
DI26-3
Q26-10
BE26-5
BE26-4
DI26-2
BE26-3
DI26-1
BE26-2
BE26-6
E26-1
E26-1
Analysis
Q26-9
Q26-6
Q26-7
Q26-5
Q26-3
Q26-4
Q26-1
Q26-2
Application
Q26-13
Q26-11
Q26-8
BE26-1
Knowledge Comprehension
Correlation Chart between Bloom’s Taxonomy, Study Objectives and End-of-Chapter Exercises and Problems
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit
BLOOM’S TAXONOMY TABLE
Weygandt, Accounting Principles, 9/e, Solutions Manual
(For Instructor Use Only)
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit
ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS
1.
The following steps are frequently involved in management’s decision-making process:
(a) Identify the problem and assign responsibility.
(b) Determine and evaluate possible courses of action.
(c) Make a decision.
(d) Review results of the decision.
2.
Your roommate is incorrect. Accounting contributes to the decision-making process at only two
points: (1) prior to the decision, accounting provides relevant revenue and cost data for each
course of action, and (2) following the decision, internal reports are prepared to show the actual
effect of the decision on net income.
3.
Disagree. Incremental analysis involves the identification of financial data that change under alternative
courses of action.
4.
In incremental analysis, the important point to consider is whether costs will differ (change) between the
two alternatives. As a result, (1) variable costs may change under the alternative courses of action and
(2) fixed costs may not change.
5.
The relevant data in deciding whether to accept an order at a special price are the incremental
revenues to be obtained compared to the incremental costs of filling the special order.
6.
The manufacturing costs that are relevant in the make-or-buy decision are those that will change
if the parts are purchased.
7.
Opportunity cost may be defined as the potential benefit that may be obtained by following an
alternative course of action. Opportunity cost is relevant in a make-or-buy decision when the facilities
used to make the part can be used to generate additional income.
8.
The decision rule in a decision to sell a product or to process it further is: Process further as long as the
incremental revenue from the additional processing exceeds the incremental processing costs.
9.
A sunk cost is a cost that cannot be changed by any present or future decision. Sunk costs,
therefore, are not relevant in a decision to retain or replace equipment.
10.
Net income will be lower if an unprofitable product line is eliminated when the product line is producing a positive contribution margin and its fixed costs cannot be avoided or reduced.
11.
Contribution margin per unit of limited resource is determined by dividing the contribution margin
per unit of the product by the number of units of the limited resource required to produce one unit
of the product.
12.
The screening of proposed capital expenditures may be done by a capital budgeting committee
which submits its findings to the officers of the company. The officers, in turn, select the projects
they believe to be the most worthy of funding and submit them to the board of directors. The directors
ultimately approve the capital expenditure budget for the year.
Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Weygandt, Accounting Principles, 9/e, Solutions Manual
(For Instructor Use Only)
26-7
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit
Questions Chapter 26 (Continued)
13.
The formula for the annual rate of return technique is: Annual net income ÷ average investment.
14.
Cost of capital is the rate of return that management expects to pay on all borrowed and equity
funds. The decision rule is: A project is acceptable if its rate of return is greater than or equal to
management’s minimum rate of return (which often is its cost of capital), and the project is unacceptable
when the rate of return is less than the minimum rate of return.
15.
Pete is not correct. The formula for the cash payback technique is: Cost of the capital investment ÷
net annual cash flows. The formula for the annual rate of return is: Expected annual net income ÷
average investment.
16.
The cash payback technique is relatively easy to compute and understand. However, it should not
ordinarily be the only basis for the capital budgeting decision because it ignores the profitability of
the investment and the time value of money.
17.
The two tables are:
(1) Table 1 is the present value of a single future amount. This table is used when a project has
uneven cash flows over its useful life.
(2) Table 2 is the present value of a series of future cash flows. This table is used when a project
has equal cash flows occurring at equal intervals of time over its useful life.
18.
The decision rule is: Accept the project when net present value is zero or positive; reject the project
when net present value is negative.
19.
The steps are:
(a) Compute the rate of return factor by dividing Capital Investment by Net Annual Cash Flows.
(b) Use the factor and the present value of an annuity of 1 table to find the internal rate of return.
20.
Under the internal rate of return method, the objective is to find the rate that will make the present
value of the expected annual cash inflows equal the present value of the proposed capital expenditure.
The decision rule under the internal rate of return method is: Accept the project when the internal rate
of return is equal to or greater than the required rate of return, and reject the project when the internal
rate of return is less than the required rate.
26-8
Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Weygandt, Accounting Principles, 9/e, Solutions Manual
(For Instructor Use Only)
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit
SOLUTIONS TO BRIEF EXERCISES
BRIEF EXERCISE 26-1
The correct order is:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Identify the problem and assign responsibility.
Determine and evaluate possible courses of action.
Make a decision.
Review results of the decision.
BRIEF EXERCISE 26-2
Sales
Costs
Net income
Alternative
A
Alternative
B
$150,000
100,000
$ 50,000
$180,000
120,000
$ 60,000
Net Income
Increase
(Decrease)
($ 30,000
( (20,000)
($ 10,000
Alternative B is better than Alternative A.
BRIEF EXERCISE 26-3
Revenues
Costs—Variable manufacturing
Shipping
Net income
Reject
Order
Accept
Order
Net Income
Increase
(Decrease)
$0
0
0
$0
$92,000
80,000
4,000
$ 8,000
($ 92,000
((80,000)
( (4,000)
($ 8,000
The special order should be accepted.
Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Weygandt, Accounting Principles, 9/e, Solutions Manual
(For Instructor Use Only)
26-9
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit
BRIEF EXERCISE 26-4
Variable manufacturing costs
Fixed manufacturing costs
Purchase price
Total annual cost
Make
Buy
Net Income
Increase
(Decrease)
$50,000
30,000
$
0
30,000
53,000
$83,000
$(50,000)
0)
(53,000)
$ (3,000)
$80,000
The decision should be to continue to make the part.
BRIEF EXERCISE 26-5
Sales per unit
Cost per unit
Variable
Fixed
Total
Net income per unit
Sell
Process
Further
Net Income
Increase (Decrease)
$60.00
$72.00
$ 12.00
30.00
10.00
40.00
$20.00
38.00
10.00
48.00
$24.00
(8.00)
0
( (8.00)
$ 4.00
The bookcases should be processed further because the incremental revenues
exceed incremental costs by $4.00 per unit.
BRIEF EXERCISE 26-6
Variable manufacturing costs
New machine cost
Total
Retain
Equipment
Replace
Equipment
Net 4-Year
Income
Increase
(Decrease)
$2,400,000
$1,760,000
200,000
$1,960,000
($ 640,000*
* (200,000)
$ 440,000
$2,400,000
*$160,000 X 4
The old factory machine should be replaced.
26-10
Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Weygandt, Accounting Principles, 9/e, Solutions Manual
(For Instructor Use Only)
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit
BRIEF EXERCISE 26-7
Sales
Variable expenses
Contribution margin
Fixed expenses
Net income
Continue
Eliminate
$200,000
180,000
20,000
40,000
($ (20,000)
(
Net Income
Increase (Decrease)
0)
0
0)
($ 34,000)
($(34,000)
$(200,000)
180,000)
(20,000)
6,000)
$ (14,000)
The Eagle product line should be continued because $20,000 of contribution
margin will not be realized if the line is eliminated. This sum is greater than
the $6,000 saving of fixed costs.
BRIEF EXERCISE 26-8
Product A
Contribution margin per unit (a)
Machine hours required (b)
Contribution margin per unit of limited resource
[(a) ÷ (b)]
$11
2
$5.50
Product B
$12
2.5
$4.80
BRIEF EXERCISE 26-9
$300,000 ÷ ($10,000 + $30,000) = 7.5 years
BRIEF EXERCISE 26-10
The annual rate of return is calculated by dividing expected annual income
by the average investment. The company’s expected annual income is:
$130,000 – $80,000 = $50,000
Its average investment is:
$490,000 + $10,000
= $250,000
2
Therefore, its annual rate of return is:
$50,000/$250,000 = 20%
Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Weygandt, Accounting Principles, 9/e, Solutions Manual
(For Instructor Use Only)
26-11
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit
BRIEF EXERCISE 26-11
Project A
Cash
9% Discount Present
Flows X
Factor
= Value
Present value of net annual cash flows
Capital investment
Positive net present value
$70,000 X
6.41766
= $449,236
395,000
$ 54,236
Project B
Cash
9% Discount Present
Flows X
Factor
= Value
Present value of net annual cash flows
Capital investment
Positive net present value
$50,000 X
6.41766
= $320,883
270,000
$ 50,883
Since Project A has a higher net present value than Project B, it should be
selected.
BRIEF EXERCISE 26-12
When net annual cash flows are expected to be equal, the internal rate of
return can be approximated by dividing the capital investment by the net
annual cash flows to determine the discount factor, and then locating this
discount factor on the present value of an annuity table.
$170,000/$33,740 = 5.03853
By tracing across on the 7-year row we see that the discount factor for 9% is
5.03295. Thus, the internal rate of return on this project is approximately 9%.
BRIEF EXERCISE 26-13
Present Value
Net annual cash flows $34,000 X 6.71
Capital investment $225,000 X 1.00
Positive net present value
$228,140
225,000
$ 3,140
The investment should be made because net present value is positive.
26-12
Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Weygandt, Accounting Principles, 9/e, Solutions Manual
(For Instructor Use Only)
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit
SOLUTIONS FOR DO IT! REVIEW EXERCISES
DO IT! 26-1
Revenues
Costs
Net income
Reject
$ –0–
$ –0–
$ –0–
Accept
$186,000
132,000*
$ 54,000
Net Income
Increase (Decrease)
$186,000
132,000
$ 54,000
*(6,000 X $20) + (6,000 X $2)
Given the results of the above analysis, Corn Company should accept the
special order.
DO IT! 26-2
(a)
Direct materials
Direct labor
Variable manufacturing
costs
Fixed manufacturing
costs
Purchase price
Total cost
Make
$ 30,000
42,000
Buy
$ –0–
–0–
45,000
–0–
60,000
–0–
$177,000
Net Income
Increase (Decrease)
$ 30,000
42,000
45,000
40,000
165,000
$205,000
20,000
(165,000)
$ (28,000)
Given the results of the above analysis, Barney Company will incur
$28,000 of additional costs if it buys the switches.
(b)
Total Cost
Opportunity cost
Total cost
Make
$177,000
30,000
$207,000
Buy
$205,000
–0–
$205,000
Net Income
Increase (Decrease)
$(28,000)
30,000
$ 2,000
Yes, the answer is different: The analysis shows that net income will
be increased by $2,000 if Barney Company purchases the switches.
Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Weygandt, Accounting Principles, 9/e, Solutions Manual
(For Instructor Use Only)
26-13
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit
DO IT! 26-3
Sales
Variable costs
Contribution margin
Fixed costs
Net income
Continue
$500,000
375,000
125,000
150,000
$ (25,000)
Eliminate
$
0
0
0
40,000
$(40,000)
Net Income
Increase (Decrease)
$(500,000)
375,000
(125,000)
110,000
$ (15,000)
The analysis indicates that Lion should not eliminate that gloves and mittens
line because net income would decrease $15,000.
DO IT! 26-4
(a) Average investment = ($350,000 + 0) ÷ 2 = $175,000
Annual rate of return = $40,000 ÷ $175,000 = 22.9%
(b) Net annual cash flow = $40,000 + $70,000 = $110,000
Cash payback period = $350,000 ÷ $110,000 = 3.2 years
DO IT! 26-5
(a) Estimated annual cash inflows
Estimated annual cash outflows
Net annual cash flow
Present value of net annual
cash flows
Capital investment
Net present value
*Table 4, Appendix A.
$300,000
140,000
$160,000
Cash Flow
9% Discount
Factor
Present
Value
$160,000
4.48592*
$717,747
700,000
$ 17,747
Since the net present value is greater than zero, Maranantha should
accept the project.
(b) $700,000 ÷ 160,000 = 4.375. Using Table 2 of Appendix C and the
factors that correspond with the six-period row, 4.375 is between the
factors for 9% and 10% (just under 10%). Since that project has an
internal rate that is close to 10% and the required rate of return is only
9%, the company should accept the project.
26-14
Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Weygandt, Accounting Principles, 9/e, Solutions Manual
(For Instructor Use Only)
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit
SOLUTIONS TO EXERCISES
EXERCISE 26-1
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
False. The first step in management’s decision-making process is “identify
the problem and assign responsibility”.
False. The final step in management’s decision-making process is to
review the results of the decision.
True.
False. In making business decisions, management ordinarily considers
both financial and nonfinancial information.
True.
True.
False. Costs that are the same under all alternative courses of action do
not affect the decision.
False. When using incremental analysis, either costs or revenues or both
will change under alternative courses of action.
False. Sometimes variable costs will not change under alternative courses
of action, but fixed costs will.
EXERCISE 26-2
(a)
Revenues (40,000 X $6.00)
Cost of goods sold
Operating expenses
Net income
Reject
Order
$0
0
0
$0
Accept
Order
$240,000
168,000 (1)
62,000 (2)
$ 10,000
Net Income
Increase
(Decrease)
$ 240,000
((168,000)
( (62,000)
$ 10,000
(1) Variable cost of goods sold = $2,400,000 X 70% = $1,680,000.
Variable cost of goods sold per unit = $1,680,000 ÷ 400,000 = $4.20.
Variable cost of goods sold for the special order = $4.20 X 40,000 =
$168,000.
(2) Variable operating expenses = $900,000 X 60% = $540,000;
$540,000 ÷ 400,000 = $1.35 per unit;
40,000 X $1.35 = $54,000;
$54,000 + $8,000 = $62,000.
(b) As shown in the incremental analysis, Wyco Company should accept
the special order because incremental revenues exceed incremental
expenses by $10,000.
Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Weygandt, Accounting Principles, 9/e, Solutions Manual
(For Instructor Use Only)
26-15
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit
EXERCISE 26-3
(a)
Revenues
Materials ($0.50)
Labor ($1.50)
Variable overhead ($1.00)
Fixed overhead
Sales commissions
Net income
Reject
Order
Accept
Order
$ -0-0-0-0-0-0$ -0-
$23,750
(2,500)
(7,500)
(5,000)
(5,000)
-0$ 3,750
Net Income
Increase
(Decrease)
$23,750
(2,500)
(7,500)
(5,000)
(5,000)
-0$ 3,750
(b) As shown in the incremental analysis, Innova should accept the special
order because incremental revenue exceeds incremental expenses by
$3,750.
(c) It is assumed that sales of the golf disc in other markets would not be
affected by this special order. If other sales were affected. Innova would
have to consider the lost sales in making the decision. Second, if Innova
is operating at full capacity, it is likely that the special order would be
rejected.
EXERCISE 26-4
(a)
Direct materials (40,000 X $4.00)
Direct labor (40,000 X $6.00)
Variable manufacturing costs
($240,000 X 50%)
Fixed manufacturing costs
Purchase price (40,000 X $13.50)
Total annual cost
26-16
Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Make
$160,000
240,000
$
0
0
Net Income
Increase
(Decrease)
$ 160,000
240,000
120,000
40,000
0
$560,000
0
40,000
540,000
$580,000
120,000
0
( (540,000)
($ (20,000)
Buy
Weygandt, Accounting Principles, 9/e, Solutions Manual
(For Instructor Use Only)
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit
EXERCISE 26-4 (Continued)
(b) No, Shannon Inc. should not purchase the lamps. As indicated by the
incremental analysis, it would cost the company $20,000 more to purchase
the lamps.
(c) Yes, by purchasing the lamp shades, a total cost saving of $15,000 will
result as shown below.
Total annual cost (above)
Opportunity cost
Total cost
Make
Buy
$560,000
35,000
$595,000
$580,000
0
$580,000
Net Income
Increase
(Decrease)
$(20,000)
35,000)
$ 15,000)
EXERCISE 26-5
Sell
(Basic Kit)
Process Further
(Stage 2 Kit)
Net Income
Increase
(Decrease)
Sales per unit
Costs per unit
Direct materials
Direct labor
Total
$27.00
($33.00
$ 6.00)
$12.00
0
$12.00
( ) $ 6.00 (1)
( ) 9.00 (2)
( ) $15.00)
$(6.00)
(9.00)
$(3.00)
Net income per unit
$15.00
($18.00)
$ 3.00)
(1) The cost of materials decreases because Stacy can make two Stage 2 Kits
from the materials for a basic kit.
(2) The total time to make the two kits is one hour at $18 per hour or $9
per unit.
Stacy should carry the Stage 2 Kits. The incremental revenue, $6.00, exceeds
the incremental processing costs, $3.00. Thus, net income will increase by
processing the kits further.
Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Weygandt, Accounting Principles, 9/e, Solutions Manual
(For Instructor Use Only)
26-17
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit
EXERCISE 26-6
(a)
Sales per unit
Costs per unit
Materials
Labor
Variable overhead (70%)
Fixed overhead
Total
Net income per unit
Sell
Process
Further
Net Income
Increase
(Decrease)
$400
($450
$ 50
150
70
49
21
$290
$110
(155
( 90
63
21
329
$121
(5)
(20)
(14)
-0(39)
$ 11
(b) As shown in the incremental analysis, Donkey Bikes should process further
(rather than sell unassembled) because incremental revenue exceeds
incremental expenses by $11 per unit.
EXERCISE 26-7
Operating costs
New machine cost (Depr.)
Salvage value (old)
Total
Retain
Machine
Replace
Machine
Net Income
Increase
(Decrease)
$120,000 (1)
0
0
$120,000
($100,000)(2)
( 21,000)
( (5,000)
($116,000
($ 20,000)
( (21,000)
( 5,000)
($ 4,000)
(1) $24,000 X 5.
(2) $20,000 X 5.
The current machine should be replaced. The incremental analysis shows
that net income for the five-year period will be $4,000 higher by replacing the
current machine.
26-18
Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Weygandt, Accounting Principles, 9/e, Solutions Manual
(For Instructor Use Only)
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit
EXERCISE 26-8
Sales
Variable expenses
Cost of goods sold
Operating expenses
Total variable
Contribution margin
Fixed expenses
Cost of goods sold
Operating expenses
Total fixed
Net income (loss)
Continue
Eliminate
$ 98,200)
$
(56,000)
12,000)
68,000)
30,200)
(20,470)
26,600)
47,070)
$(16,870)
(
Net Income
Increase
(Decrease)
0
$(98,200)
0
0
0
0
(56,000)
12,000)
68,000
(30,200)
(20,470
26,600
47,070
$(47,070)
(
0
0)
0)
$(30,200)
Judy is incorrect. The incremental analysis shows that net income will be
$30,200 less if the Ketchum Division is eliminated. This amount equals the
contribution margin that would be lost by discontinuing the division.
EXERCISE 26-9
(a)
$30,000 + $75,000 – $30,000 = $75,000
(b)
Stunner
Sales
Variable expenses
Contribution margin
Fixed expenses
Net income
$300,000
150,000
150,000
142,500*
$ 7,500
Double-Set
$500,000
200,000
300,000
262,500**
$ 37,500
Total
$800,000
350,000
450,000
405,000
$ 45,000
*$30,000 + [($300,000 ÷ $800,000) X $300,000]
**$75,000 + [($500,000 ÷ $800,000) X $300,000]
(c)
As shown in the analysis above, Shatner should not eliminate the
Mega-Power product line. Elimination of the line would cause net income
to drop from $75,000 to $45,000. The reason for this decrease in net
income is that elimination of the product line would result in the loss
of $60,000 of contribution margin while saving only $30,000 of fixed
expenses.
Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Weygandt, Accounting Principles, 9/e, Solutions Manual
(For Instructor Use Only)
26-19
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit
EXERCISE 26-10
(a)
Product
A
Contribution margin per unit (a)
Machine hours required (b)
Contribution margin per unit of limited resource
(a) ÷ (b)
$7
2
$3.50
B
C
$4
1
$4
$6
2
$3
(b) Product B should be manufactured because it results in the highest
contribution margin per machine hour.
(c) (1)
A
Machine hours (a) (3,000 ÷ 3)
Contribution margin per unit of
limited resource (b)
Total contribution margin [(a) X (b)]
Product
B
C
1,000
1,000
1,000
$ 3.50
$3,500
$
4
$4,000
$
3
$3,000
The total contribution margin is $10,500 ($3,500 + $4,000 + $3,000).
(2)
Product
B
Machine hours (a)
Contribution margin per unit of limited resource (b)
Total contribution margin [(a) X (b)]
3,000
$
4
$12,000
EXERCISE 26-11
(a) Cost of hoist: $15,000 + $2,900 + $820 = $18,720.
Net annual cash flow:
Number of extra mufflers: 4 X 52 weeks
Contribution margin per muffler ($65 – $35 – $10)
Total net annual cash flow (a) X (b)
Cash payback = $18,720 ÷ $4,160 = 4.5 years.
26-20
Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Weygandt, Accounting Principles, 9/e, Solutions Manual
(a)
208
(b) $ 20
$4,160
(For Instructor Use Only)
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit
EXERCISE 26-11 (Continued)
(b) Average investment: ($18,720 + $1,080) ÷ 2 = $9,900.
Annual depreciation: ($18,720 – $1,080) ÷ 5 = $3,528.
Annual net income: $4,160 – $3,528 = $632.
Average annual rate of return = $632 ÷ $9,900 = 6.4% (rounded).
EXERCISE 26-12
(a)
Year
1
2
3
AA
Annual Net
Cash Flow
$ 7,000
9,000
15,000
Cumulative Net
Cash Flow
$ 7,000
16,000
31,000
Cash payback 2.40 years (2 + .4*)
*$22,000 – $16,000 = $6,000;
$6,000 ÷ $15,000 = .4
BB
22,000 ÷ (28,500 ÷ 3) = 2.32 years
Year
1
2
3
CC
Annual Net
Cash Flow
$13,000
10,000
9,000
Cumulative Net
Cash Flow
$13,000
23,000
32,000
Cash payback 1.9 years (1 + .9*)
*$22,000 – 13,000 = $9,000;
$9,000 ÷ $10,000 = .9
The most desirable project is CC because it has the shortest payback
period. The least desirable project is AA because it has the longest payback period. As indicated, only CC is acceptable because its cash
payback is 1.9 years.
Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Weygandt, Accounting Principles, 9/e, Solutions Manual
(For Instructor Use Only)
26-21
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit
EXERCISE 26-12 (Continued)
(b)
AA
Year
12%
Discount
Factor
Net
Annual
Cash
Flow
BB
Present
Value
1
.89286
$ 7,000 $ 6,250
2
.79719
9,000
7,175
3
.71178
15,000
10,677
Total present value
24,102
Investment
22,000
Net present value
$ 2,102
Net
Annual
Cash
Flow
$9,500
9,500
9,500
CC
Present
Value
Net Cash
Flow
$ 8,482
$13,000
7,573
10,000
6,762
9,000
22,817 (1)
22,000
$
817
Present
Value
$ 11,607
7,972
6,406
25,985
22,000
$ 3,985
(1) This total may also be obtained from Table 2: $9,500 X 2.40183 =
$22,817. Project CC is still the most desirable project. Also, on
the basis of net present values, all of the projects are acceptable.
Project BB is the least desirable.
EXERCISE 26-13
(a) (1) Annual rate of return: $18,000 ÷ [($150,000 + $0) ÷ 2] = 24%.
(2) Cash payback: $150,000 ÷ $48,000 = 3.13 years.
(b)
Item
Amount
Years
PV Factor
Present Value
Net annual cash flows
Capital investment
Positive net present value
$ 48,000
$150,000
1-5
Now
3.60478
1.00000
$173,029
150,000
$ 23,029
EXERCISE 26-14
(a)
Project
Investment
÷
(Income + Depreciation)
=
Internal
Rate of
Return
Factor
22A
23A
24A
$240,000
$270,000
$288,000
÷
÷
÷
($13,300 + $40,000)
($21,000 + $30,000)
($20,000 + $36,000)
=
=
=
4.503
5.294
5.143
Closest
Discount
Factor
Internal
Rate of
Return
4.48592
5.32825
5.14612
9%
12%
11%
(b) The acceptable projects are 23A and 24A because their rates of return
are equal to or greater than the 11% minimum required rate of return.
26-22
Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Weygandt, Accounting Principles, 9/e, Solutions Manual
(For Instructor Use Only)
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit
EXERCISE 26-15
(a) Project A: ($50,000 X 3.79079) – $200,000 = $(10,461)
Project B: ($65,000 X 4.86842) – $300,000 = $16,447
(b) Vasquez should invest in Project B only. Project B is acceptable because
it has a positive net present value. Project A is unacceptable because it
has a negative net present value.
(c) Project A (adjusted): ($60,000 X 3.79079) – $220,000 = $7,447. Vasquez’
decision would change. Now both projects are acceptable.
Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Weygandt, Accounting Principles, 9/e, Solutions Manual
(For Instructor Use Only)
26-23
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit
SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEMS
PROBLEM 26-1A
(a) Production capacity = 20,000 units (16,000 ÷ 80%).
Units for special order = 4,000 (20,000 – 16,000).
Current selling price = $20 ($320,000 ÷ 16,000).
Special order price = $15 ($20 X 75%).
(b) Variable manufacturing cost per unit ..............................................
Fixed manufacturing cost per unit ($56,000 ÷ 16,000) ...............
Total manufacturing cost per unit............................................
(c)
Revenues (4,000 X $15)
Costs
Variable manufacturing
(4,000 X $8.00)
Sales commission
Shipping (4,000 X $2.00)
Stamping machine
Total costs
Net income
$ 8.00
3.50
$11.50
Reject
Order
Accept
Order
Net Income
(Increase
(Decrease)
$0
$60,000
($ 60,000
0
32,000
((32,000)
0
0
0
0
$0
3,500
8,000
2,500
46,000
$14,000
(3,500)
(8,000)
( (2,500)
(46,000)
($ 14,000
Korte Company should accept the special order because it will produce
$14,000 of incremental net income.
(d) The cost of the special order = $46,000 ÷ 4,000 = $11.50 Thus, the
minimum selling price to produce net income of $1.20 per unit is $12.70.
(e) Nonfinancial factors to be considered are: (1) possible effects on domestic
sales, (2) possible alternative uses of the unused plant capacity, and
(3) ability to meet customer’s schedule for delivery without increasing
costs.
26-24
Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Weygandt, Accounting Principles, 9/e, Solutions Manual
(For Instructor Use Only)
To download more slides, ebook, solutions and test bank, visit
PROBLEM 26-2A
(a)
Make
Direct material (36,000 X $2.00)
Direct labor (2,000 X 3 X $11.00)
Manufacturing overhead costs
Indirect labor
Utilities
Depreciation
Property taxes & insurance
Cost of goods purchased
(36,000 X $3.90)
Receiving
Freight (36,000 X $.30)
Storage (6,000 X $.60)
Total annual cost
$ 72,000
66,000
Net Income
Increase
(Decrease)
Buy
$
0
0
$ 72,000
66,000
5,500
1,300
1,600
1,000
0
0
0
0
0
140,400
5,500
1,300
1,600
1,000
( (140,400)
0
0
3,600
$151,000
8,500
10,800
0
$159,700
( (8,500)
( (10,800)
3,600
($ (8,700)
Decision: Continue to make the part. The cost to make the part and rent
storage space for the finished product is $151,000, while the cost to buy
the part and use the excess space for storage is $159,700. Hence,
continuing to make the part will result in an annual cost savings of $8,700.
(b)
Total annual cost
Opportunity cost
Total cost
Make
Buy
Net Income
Increase
(Decrease)
$151,000
10,000
$161,000
$159,700
0
$159,700
($ (8,700)
( 10,000)
($ 1,300)
Decision: Buy the part.
(c) Nonfinancial factors include: (1) the adverse effect on employees if the
part is purchased, (2) how long the supplier will be able to satisfy the
Martinez Manufacturing Company’s quality control standards at the quoted
price per unit, and (3) will the supplier deliver the units when they are
needed?
Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Weygandt, Accounting Principles, 9/e, Solutions Manual
(For Instructor Use Only)
26-25