PART I
GOVERNMENT AND
ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY
MARKET FAILURE
17/08/11
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
1
CHAPTER 1
MONOPOLY: A MARKET
FAILURE
17/08/11
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
2
Introduction
Free Market
17/08/11
Competitive
Forces
Market
Efficiency
Market
Failure
Regulation
Regulation
Equitable
Distribution
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
3
1
Introduction
Market failure occurs when freely functioning
markets, operating without government
intervention, fail to deliver an efficient or
optimal allocation of resources
Therefore economic and social welfare may
not be maximized
This leads to a loss of economic efficiency
17/08/11
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
4
Monopoly
1. Definition of monopoly
17/08/11
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
5
1. Definition
While a competitive firm is a price taker,
a monopoly firm is a price maker.
17/08/11
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
6
2
Monopoly
A firm is considered a monopolist if . . .
17/08/11
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
7
Monopoly power occurs when the seller of a
product can influence prices
it is the sole seller of its product.
its product does not have close substitutes.
A single seller is a monopolist
There is oligopoly if there are several sellers
Monopsony power occurs when the buyer of
a product can influence price
17/08/11
A single buyer is a monopsonist
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
8
Monopoly
2. Causes of monopoly
17/08/11
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
9
3
Why Monopoly??
The fundamental cause of monopoly is
barriers to entry.
17/08/11
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
10
Barriers to Entry
The reason a monopoly exists is that other
firms find it unprofitable or impossible to
enter the market
Barriers to entry are the source of all
monopoly power
there are two general types of barriers to entry
17/08/11
technical barriers
legal barriers
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
11
Technical Barriers to Entry
The production of a good may exhibit
decreasing marginal and average costs
over a wide range of output levels
in this situation, relatively large-scale firms are
low-cost producers
17/08/11
firms may find it profitable to drive others out of the
industry by cutting prices
this situation is known as natural monopoly
once the monopoly is established, entry of new firms
will be difficult
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
12
4
Technical Barriers to Entry
Another technical basis of monopoly is
special knowledge of a low-cost productive
technique
it may be difficult to keep this knowledge out of
the hands of other firms
Ownership of unique resources may also
be a lasting basis for maintaining a
monopoly
17/08/11
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
13
Legal Barriers to Entry
Many pure monopolies are created as a
matter of law
17/08/11
with a patent, the basic technology for a
product is assigned to one firm
the government may also award a firm an
exclusive franchise to serve a market
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
14
Creation of Barriers to Entry
Some barriers to entry result from actions
taken by the firm
research and development of new products or
technologies
purchase of unique resources
lobbying efforts to gain monopoly power
The attempt by a monopolist to erect
barriers to entry may involve real resource
costs
17/08/11
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
15
5
Economies of Scale as a Cause of Monopoly...
Cost
Average
total
cost
0
17/08/11
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
Quantity of Output
16
Monopoly
3. Recap about monopoly
17/08/11
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
17
a, Monopoly versus Competition
Monopoly
Is the sole producer
Has a downwardsloping demand
curve
Is a price maker
Reduces price to
increase sales
17/08/11
Competitive Firm
Is one of many
producers
Has a horizontal
demand curve
Is a price taker
Sells as much or as
little at same price
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
18
6
Comparing Monopoly and Competition
For a competitive firm, price equals marginal
cost.
P = MR = MC
For a monopoly firm, price exceeds marginal
cost.
P > MR = MC
17/08/11
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
19
b, A Monopoly’s Revenue
Total Revenue
P x Q = TR
Average Revenue
Marginal Revenue
TR/Q = AR = P
TR/Q = MR
17/08/11
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
20
Monopoly’s Marginal Revenue
A monopolist’s marginal revenue is always
less than the price of its good.
The
demand curve is downward sloping.
a monopoly drops the price to sell one
more unit, the revenue received from
previously sold units also decreases.
When
17/08/11
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
21
7
A Monopoly’s Total, Average, and
Marginal Revenue
Quantity
(Q)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Price
(P)
$11.00
$10.00
$9.00
$8.00
$7.00
$6.00
$5.00
$4.00
$3.00
17/08/11
Total Revenue
(TR=PxQ)
$0.00
$10.00
$18.00
$24.00
$28.00
$30.00
$30.00
$28.00
$24.00
Average
Revenue
(AR=TR/Q)
Marginal Revenue
(MR= TR / Q )
$10.00
$9.00
$8.00
$7.00
$6.00
$5.00
$4.00
$3.00
$10.00
$8.00
$6.00
$4.00
$2.00
$0.00
-$2.00
-$4.00
22
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
Demand and Marginal Revenue Curves for
a Monopoly...
Price
$11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
-1
-2
-3
17/08/11
-4
Demand
(average revenue)
Marginal
revenue
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Quantity of Water
23
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
Profit-Maximization for a Monopoly...
2. ...and then the demand
curve shows the price
consistent with this
quantity.
Costs and
Revenue
B
Monopoly
price
1. The intersection of
the marginal-revenue
curve and the marginalcost curve determines
the profit-maximizing
quantity...
Average total cost
A
Demand
Marginal
cost
Marginal revenue
0
17/08/11
QMAX
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
Quantity
24
8
c, The Monopoly’s Profit
Profit equals total revenue minus total costs.
Profit = TR - TC
Profit = (TR/Q - TC/Q) x Q
Profit = (P - ATC) x Q
17/08/11
25
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
The Monopolist’s Profit
The monopolist will receive economic
profits as long as price is greater than
average total cost.
17/08/11
26
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
The Monopolist’s Profit...
Costs and
Revenue
Marginal cost
Average
total cost D
B
y
ol
op it
on f
M pro
Monopoly E
price
Average total cost
C
Demand
Marginal revenue
0
17/08/11
QMAX
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
Quantity
27
9
Monopoly = market failure
4. Deadweight welfare loss under
monopoly
17/08/11
£
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
28
A monopolist producing less than the
social optimum
MC
P1
MC1
AR
MR
O
£
Q
Q1
Monopoly output
17/08/11
29
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
A monopolist producing less than the
social optimum MC = MSC
P1
P2 = MSB
= MSC
MC1
AR = MSB
MR
O
Monopoly output
17/08/11
Q1
Q
Q2
30
Perfectly competitive output
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
10
£
Deadweight loss under
monopoly
MC
(= S under perfect competition)
Consumer
surplus
Ppc
a
Producer
surplus
AR = D
O
Qpc
Q
17/08/11
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
(a) Industry equilibrium
under perfect competition
£
Pm
Ppc
Deadweight loss under
MC
(= S under perfect competition)
monopoly
Deadweight
welfare loss
Consumer
surplus
b
a
Producer
surplus
AR = D
MR
O
17/08/11
£
31
Qpc
Qpc
Q
Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
(b) Industry Public
equilibrium
under monopoly
Deadweight loss under monopoly
32
MC
(= S under perfect competition)
Perfect
competition
Consumer
surplus
Ppc
a
Producer
surplus
AR = D
O
Qpc
Q
17/08/11
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
(a) Industry equilibrium
under perfect competition
33
11
Deadweight loss under monopoly
MC
£
(= S under perfect competition)
Monopoly
Consumer
surplus
Pm
Ppc
Deadweight
welfare loss
b
a
Producer
surplus
AR = D
MR
O
17/08/11
Qpc
Qpc
Q
Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
(b) Industry Public
equilibrium
under monopoly
34
Monopoly
5. Public Policy Toward Monopolies
17/08/11
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
35
5.1. Public Policy Toward Monopoly
Government responds to the problem of
monopoly in one of four ways.
17/08/11
Making monopolized industries more competitive.
Regulating the behavior of monopolists.
Turning some private monopolies into public
enterprises.
Doing nothing at all.
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
36
12
Regulation of Monopoly
The natural policy is to encourage competition
This can be done directly by enforcing division of
monopolists
US antitrust legislation applied to Standard Oil (1911) and
Bell System (1984) => division into separate competing
firms
It can be done indirectly by reducing barriers to entry
Legal barriers can be removed by changing the law
But why were they imposed initially?
17/08/11
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
37
Regulation of Monopoly
Technological barriers can be reduced insistence on
knowledge sharing
US insists Microsoft provides information
Patents are also a barrier to entry
Optimum length trades reward for innovation against stifling
of competition
Advertising and excess capacity can be part of an
entry deterrence strategy
Advertising expenditure can be limited (e.g. tobacco)
Proving excess capacity is held to deter entry is difficult
17/08/11
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
38
5.2. Regulation of a Natural Monopoly
Natural monopolies such as the utility,
communications, and transportation
industries are highly regulated in many
countries
17/08/11
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
39
13
Regulation of a Natural Monopoly
Many economists believe that it is
important for the prices of regulated
monopolies to reflect marginal costs of
production accurately
An enforced policy of marginal cost pricing
will cause a natural monopoly to operate at
a loss
natural monopolies exhibit declining average
costs over a wide range of output
17/08/11
40
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
Regulation of a Natural Monopoly
Because natural monopolies exhibit
decreasing costs, MC falls below AC
Price
An unregulated monopoly will
maximize profit at Q1 and P1
If regulators force the
monopoly to charge a
price of P2, the firm will
suffer a loss because
P2 < C2
P1
C1
C2
AC
MR
P2
MC
Q1
17/08/11
Q2 D
Quantity
41
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
a, Marginal-Cost Pricing for a Natural
Monopoly...
Price
Average
total cost
Regulated
price
Average total cost
Loss
Marginal cost
Demand
17/08/11
0
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
Quantity 42
14
b, Pricing for a Natural Monopoly as AC
Price
Price as AC
Average
total cost
Average total cost
Marginal cost
MR
0
17/08/11
Demand
Q1 Q2 Q0
Quantity
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
43
c, Price Discrimination
Price discrimination is the practice of selling the
same good at different prices to different customers,
even though the costs for producing for the two
customers are the same. In order to do this, the firm
must have market power.
17/08/11
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
44
Price Discrimination
Two
important effects of price
discrimination:
It
can increase the monopolist’s profits.
It can reduce deadweight loss.
But in order to price discriminate, the firm must
Be able to separate the customers on the
basis of willingness to pay.
Prevent the customers from reselling the
product.
17/08/11
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
45
15
Regulation of Monopoly
Suppose that the regulatory commission allows the
monopoly to charge a price of P1 to some users
Price
Other users are offered the lower price
of P2
The profits on the sales to highprice customers are enough to
cover the losses on the sales to
low-price customers
P1
C1
C2
AC
MC
P2
Q1
17/08/11
Q2 D
Quantity
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
46
Regulation of Monopoly
Another approach followed in many
regulatory situations is to allow the
monopoly to charge a price above
marginal cost that is sufficient to earn a
“fair” rate of return on investment
17/08/11
if this rate of return is greater than that which
would occur in a competitive market, there is
an incentive to use relatively more capital than
would truly minimize costs
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
47
Regulation of Oligopoly
Collusion among firms allowed price to rise and
profit to increase
Tacit collusion may be difficult for a regulator to
detect
Does a high price represent lack of substitutes or price
collusion?
This question is answered by calculating price
elasticities and using these to construct Lerner index
with and without collusion
17/08/11
Breakfast cereal: collusion implies Lerner of 65-75%
Competition implies Lerner of 40-44%
Actual index about 45%, implying no collusion
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
48
16
Regulation of Oligopoly
Mergers can damage economic efficiency by
increasing monopoly power
Mergers are regulated by governments
A merger is not permitted if it is judged to harm the
public interest
Estimated demand elasticities can be used to
predict the outcome of a merger
The predicted price changes favor the merger
17/08/11
49
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
Monopsony
A monopsonist is a single buyer
Such as the only firm using a specialized form of labor
Monopsony results in price (or wage) being below
the competitive level
The monopsonist takes account of the fact that a
higher price (or wage) must be paid to all units
purchased
This provides a disincentive to raising the wage to
the competitive level
Monopsony causes a deadweight loss
17/08/11
50
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
Monopsony
Labor demand is given by
the marginal revenue of
labor (MRL)
The competitive wage is wc
The marginal cost for the
monopsonist is w plus
additional payment to
existing workers
Monopsony wage is wm
Wage
Marginal
Cost
Labor Supply
w(L)
wc
wm
Labor Demand
MRL
Lm
Lc
Quantity
of Labor
Monopsony in the
labor market
17/08/11
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
51
17
Next CHAPTER…
EXTERNALITIES
17/08/11
Public Economics - Hoang Phu LY - FTU
52
18