方斑东风螺对饮料蛋白质需要量的研究 Ốc hương Babylonia
Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (166.44 KB, 5 trang )
45
2006
厦 门大学学报 ( 自然 科学版 )
Journal of X iam en U niversity ( Na tu ra l Science)
5
V o .l 45 Sup.
M ay 2006
*
许贻斌, 柯才焕 , 王德祥, 魏永杰, 吕剑泉
(
,
(
:
8
361005)
26. 90 ? 1. 52 e ,
,
2. 16 ? 0. 05 g
) ,
( Baby lonia areo lata L ink)
:
27. 6 ? 0. 5
60 d
,
( p < 0. 05).
.
43. 10%
35. 17%
,
( p > 0. 05),
,
(p > 0. 05).
,
36. 47% ~ 43. 10% .
:
;
;
: S 966. 2
:A
: 0438-0479( 2006) S-0216-05
( B aby lonia areolata L ink)
,
.
,
,
,
.
,
,
,
27. 6 ?
25~ 28,
0. 5.
,
0. 2 m
20 cm
24~ 29e
,
26. 90 ? 1. 52 e ,
,
.
2
50 cm
6 L.
,
.
1. 2
,
.
20%
,
55%
,
.
[ 1]
18
.
60 d
.
2. 1~ 2. 3 g
(
.
2 cm
40
,
)
,
( 20
,
,
.
,
[ 2~ 10]
(
,
,
.
,
.
,
20
5%
,
),
,
,
,
)
,
43. 20 g,
43. 20 g.
.
60 d
.
1
1. 3
1.
1. 1
,
1. 4
1
.
80
: 2005-11-03
:
:
*
,
: chke@ xmu. edu. cn
, 80%
-
,
100
10% (
)
( 03EFN 213500133)
( 1979- ) ,
,
.
,
, - 20e
. 100%
.
,
,
,
.
# 217 #
:
*
1
T ab. 1
Ing red ient of the expe rim ental diets for B abylonia areo la ta
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
(% )
0
6
12
18
24
30
36
42
(% )
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
42
36
30
24
18
12
6
0
(% )
: 3% ; A-
*
: 0. 5% ;
: 18% ;
: 1% ;
: 1. 5% ;
: 3% ;
: 1% .
4e
,
.
spss 11. 0
1. 5
T ukey
.
2
Buch i(
)
K-314
2. 1
;
(
)
;
.
60 d
550e
,
.
Parr.
1261-system 2
3.
3
,
2.
41. 12%
,
1. 6
( 1)
,
,
,
3h
, - 20e
60e
,
( p < 0. 05) .
41. 12%
,
35. 17%
.
( 2)
,
0. 05) .
,
,
.
( 3)
10: 00
,
,
.
( p>
( p > 0. 05 ).
41. 12%
.
1. 7
(% ) =
/
@ 100
(% ) =
/
=
/
@ 100
=
@
/(
(% ) =
=
)
@ 100
/
/
(% ) = (
-
)/
@ 100
,
,
20
1
60 d
.
F ig. 1
1. 8
Curv e figure ana ly sis o f relatively percent m ass ga in in
Baby lonia areolata fed experim ental diets con taining va-
2
3
?
,
,
3
r ious pro tein levels
# 218 #
(
)
2006
2
T ab. 2 A na ly sis of nu tur ient o f experim enta l d ie ts fo r Baby lon ia areolata
*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
(% , dry mass)
20. 99
25. 55
31. 50
35. 17
41. 12
46. 12
51. 06
55. 23
65. 36
(% , dry mass)
5. 54
5. 45
5. 57
5. 54
5. 38
5. 33
5. 41
5. 51
5. 23
(% , dry mass)
9. 79
9. 53
9. 52
9. 64
9. 73
9. 94
9. 68
9. 84
15. 05
(% , w et m ass)
6. 24
6. 55
6. 98
6. 65
6. 26
6. 94
6. 71
6. 42
83. 26
(M J /kg )
16. 17
16. 77
17. 16
17. 36
17. 76
18. 16
18. 59
18. 96
19. 35
12. 98
15. 23
18. 36
20. 26
23. 16
25. 39
27. 46
29. 13
33. 77
( g /M J)
*
60e
.
3
?
(
)
T ab. 3 G row th per fo rm ance ofB abylonia areo la ta fed the d ie ts conta ining var ious pro te in leve ls( average ? SD )
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
( g)
2. 16 ? 0. 05
2. 16 ? 0. 05
2. 16 ? 0. 05
2. 16 ? 0. 05
2. 16 ? 0. 05
2. 16 ? 0. 05
2. 16? 0. 05
2. 16? 0. 05
2. 16 ? 0. 05
( g)
3. 18 ? 0. 27
3. 42 ? 0. 26
3. 56 ? 0. 25
3. 71 ? 0. 25
3. 99 ? 0. 28
3. 82 ? 0. 28
3. 74? 0. 30
3. 62? 0. 23
4. 15 ? 0. 28
47. 11? 0. 49
(% )
( cm )
( cm )
b
64. 58 ? 1. 31
c
71. 76 ? 0. 65
d
84. 49 ? 0. 65
e
76. 85 ? 1. 31
f
df
c
g
73. 26 ? 0. 49
67. 64 ? 1. 38
92. 13 ? 0. 98
2. 20 ? 0. 07
2. 20 ? 0. 07
2. 20 ? 0. 07
2. 20 ? 0. 07
2. 20 ? 0. 07
2. 20? 0. 07
2. 20? 0. 07
2. 20 ? 0. 07
2. 44 ? 0. 14
2. 49 ? 0. 09
2. 51 ? 0. 09
2. 54 ? 0. 08
2. 63 ? 0. 12
2. 57 ? 0. 14
2. 54? 0. 11
2. 52? 0. 11
2. 76 ? 0. 14
11. 01? 1. 19
( g)
11. 87? 0. 38
36. 00? 0. 78
(% )
58. 10? 0. 65
2. 20 ? 0. 07
(% )
(% )
a
a
a
a
13. 23? 0. 79
14. 91? 0. 59
43. 04? 1. 22
2. 78 ? 0. 06
a
2. 32 ? 0. 07
1. 72 ? 0. 04
a
1. 68 ? 0. 05
90. 00? 7. 07
a
ac
14. 11 ? 0. 94
ac
15. 38 ? 0. 07
ad
19. 47 ? 1. 30
a
19. 07 ? 0. 01
b
22. 27 ? 0. 73
bc
30. 22 ? 0. 81
b
46. 10 ? 0. 91
b
48. 98 ? 1. 16
c
49. 69 ? 1. 71
b
2. 17 ? 0. 04
a
1. 46 ? 0. 03
90. 00? 0. 00
a
b
2. 04 ? 0. 05
b
1. 39 ? 0. 03
a
100. 00 ? 0. 00
87. 5 ? 3. 54
c
2. 01 ? 0. 07
b
1. 21 ? 0. 04
a
bde
16. 60 ? 1. 64
d
31. 01 ? 1. 30
c
49. 41 ? 1. 23
c
2. 02 ? 0. 05
c
c
1. 07 ? 0. 03
d
100. 00? 0. 00
:
a
cdf
15. 56 ? 0. 92
de
33. 42 ? 0. 97
c
48. 38 ? 1. 08
97. 50 ? 3. 54
2. 07? 0. 05
0. 95? 0. 02
a
a ef
14. 53 ? 1. 92
df
35. 49 ? 1. 58
c
45. 50 ? 1. 10
c
af
a
95. 00 ? 7. 07
f
bc
2. 20? 0. 05
de
g
25. 57 ? 0. 94
0. 82? 0. 02
bc
ef
a
90. 00 ? 0. 00
(p > 0. 05);
( p < 0. 05).
,
2. 2
,
[ 5]
,
,
,
,
,
: y = 1. 7692x + 10. 599( 20. 99
[ x [ 41. 12) (R = 0. 9859).
2
,
23. 05
43. 10.
36. 47%
,
,
43. 10%
3. 1
36. 47.
.
,
36. 47% ~ 43. 10% .
3
: y=
2
2
- 0. 0663x + 5. 7153x - 45. 133 (R = 0. 9216). (
1)
43. 10%
.
,
M ai
( PER)
:
( FCE )
,
,
,
.
# 219 #
:
[ 2 ~ 4, 6, 7]
.
[ 12]
.
[ 4]
.
鲀 蛋白 质需 要 量的 研究 和王 贵
[ 2]
,
,
.
,
[ 4]
,
鲀蛋白质幼鱼需要量研究中和
[ 6]
.
.
3. 2
,
.
,
,
.
,
,
,
.
,
,
[ 1]
,
.
,
,
,
,
.
.
.
,
,
,
,
,
.
65. 36% ,
:
.
,
[ 1]
,
,
,
,
,
[ 2]
.
,
[ 3]
.
,
,
,
,
[ J] .
,
,
.
[ J].
,
, 1997, ( 5): 5- 7.
.
, 2005, 29( 2): 189- 192.
,
.
:
[ J].
3. 3
, 2000, 24( 6): 603
- 609.
[ 4]
,
[ J] .
,
,
,
.
,
,
,
,
.
, 2003, 23
T ibbetts S M, L all S P, A nde rson D M. D ietary prote in requ irem ent o f juvenile Am er ican ee l ( A nguilla rostrata) fed
.
,
:
( 2 ): 11- 12.
[ 7]
,
2 cm
[M ].
[ J].
.
.
[ 6]
.
,
[ 13]
.
, 1996.
.
[ 11 ]
,
, 2003, 27( 5): 450- 455.
[ 5]
,
[ 5, 10 ]
鲀 幼鱼 对蛋白 质的 最适需 要量
.
practica l diets[ J] . A quacu lture, 2000, 186: 145- 155.
,
[ 8]
,
Br itz P J. E ffect of dietary pro te in leve l on grow th performance o f Sou th A fr ican aba lone, H alio tis m idae, fed fishm ea l-
.
based sem i- pur ified diets [ J]. A quacu lture, 1996, 140: 55
- 61
[ 9]
,
V ergara J M, F ernandez-Pa lac ios H, R oba ina L,
et a.l T he
effects of vary ing d ietary prote in leve l on the g row th, feed ef
.
fic iency, pro te in utilization and body composition o f g ilthead
3. 4
sea bream fry[ J]. F isheries Sc ience, 1996( 62): 620- 623.
[ 10]
,
N asir K ureshy, A llen D avis D. P rote in requ irem ent for m aintenance and m ax im um w e ight ga in fo r the P acific wh ite
shr im p, L itopenaeus vannam e i[ J]. A quacu lture 2004, 204:
# 220 #
[ 11]
(
)
125- 143.
nutr ition of tw o spec ies o f aba lone, H alio tist and H alio tis
N ationa l R esearch Counc i.l N utrition R equrem ent o f F ish
discus Ino.
[M ]. W ashing ton DC: N ationa lA cadem y Press, 1993: 6 114.
[ 12]
2006
IV. O ptim um d ietary prote in lev el fo r g row th
[ J]. A quaculture, 1995, 136, 165- 180.
[ 13]
,
M a i K, m ercer J P, D on lon J. Comparative studies on the
.
[ J].
, 5( 1): 92- 96.
Studies on Protein R equirem ent ofBabylonia areolata Link
*
XU Y -i bin, KE C a-i huan , W ANG D e-x iang, W E IY ong- jie, LV J ian-quan
( C o lleg e o f O ceano g raphy and Env iro nm enta l Sc ience, X iam en U n iv ersity, Sta te K ey L abora to ry o f
M arine Env iro nm enta l Sc ience ( X iam en U n iv ersity), X iam en 361005, Ch ina)
Abstract: A 60-day g row th ex per im ent w as conducted in o rder to determ ine the pro te in requ irem en t fo r the g row th o f Ba by lon ia a reo lata L ink w ith in itia lm a ss o f 2. 16 ? 0. 05g , at the tem perature o f 26. 90 ? 1. 52 e
and the sa lin ity o f 27. 6 ? 0. 5. W h ite f ish m eal and ca-
sein w ere used as the m a in dietary pro tein source to fo rm u la te exper im enta l diets at e ig ht pro te in leve ls. T he re su lts show ed that the re lationsh ip be tw een the feed pro te in requirem ent and the re lativ e m a ss ga in o fBaby lon ia a reo la ta L ink w as pa rabo la reg re ssion. The re la tive
m a ss g ain o f Babylonia a reo la ta reached itsm ax im um w hen the d ie tary pro te in leve lw as up to 43. 10% . (p < 0. 05) T here w as no sig nif-i
cant difference be tw een the diets feed eff ic iency and feed coe fficien tw hen dietary pro te in leve lw as ov er 35. 17% ( p > 0. 05). T he pro tein
e fficiency ratio tended to decrease w ith the increasing dietary pro te in leve .l T he re w as no sign ifican t difference in the surv iv a l rate. (p > 0.
05) . B ased on the ana ly sis o f regression equa tion and using the relative m ass ga in as index, w e cou ld determ ine that the op tim a l pro te in requirem ent o f Ba by lon ia a reo lata L ink shou ld be a t the range o f 36. 47% ~ 43. 10% .
K ey words: Babylonia ar eo la ta L ink; pro te in requirem en;t re la tive m a ss ga in
