Tải bản đầy đủ (.pdf) (72 trang)

Designing esp syllabus for information technology students at a college of technology and economics in hanoi

Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (645.92 KB, 72 trang )

VIETNAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, HANOI
UNIVERSITY OF LANGUAGES AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES
FACULTY OF POST-GRAFUAT STUDIES
-----------------------

NGUYỄN THỊ HƯỜNG

DESIGNING ESP SYLLABUS FOR INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGY STUDENTS AT A COLLEGE OF
TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS IN HANOI
THIẾT KẾ CHƯƠNG TRÌNH TIẾNG ANH CHUYÊN NGÀNH CHO
SINH VIÊN NGÀNH CÔNG NGHỆ THÔNG TIN TẠI MỘT TRƯỜNG
CAO ĐẲNG CÔNG NGHỆ VÀ KINH TẾ Ở HÀ NỘI

M.A. MINOR PROGRAMME THESIS

Field: English Teaching Methodology
Code: 60140111

HANOI – 2017


VIETNAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, HANOI
UNIVERSITY OF LANGUAGES AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES
FACULTY OF POST-GRAFUAT STUDIES
-----------------------

NGUYỄN THỊ HƯỜNG

DESIGNING ESP SYLLABUS FOR INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGY STUDENTS AT A COLLEGE OF


TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS IN HANOI
THIẾT KẾ CHƯƠNG TRÌNH TIẾNG ANH CHUYÊN NGÀNH CHO
SINH VIÊN NGÀNH CÔNG NGHỆ THÔNG TIN TẠI MỘT TRƯỜNG
CAO ĐẲNG CÔNG NGHỆ VÀ KINH TẾ Ở HÀ NỘI

M.A. MINOR PROGRAMME THESIS

Field: English Teaching Methodology
Code: 60140111
Supervisor: Prof.Dr.Hoàng Văn Vân

HANOI - 2017


DECLARATION

I hereby declare that this thesis is my own work and has not been submitted
anywhere for any award. Where other sources of information have been used, they
have been acknowledged.

Hanoi, September 2017

Nguyễn Thị Hường

i


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study would not exist without the support and encouragement from

many people whom I wish to thank here.
First and foremost, I would like to send a stunning bunch of flowers to my
supervisor, Prof.Dr.Hoang Van Van, who gave me valuable suggestions,
considerate guidance and encouragements in the development and completion of
this study.
I would be grateful to all of my lecturers in the post-graduate department of
VNU University of Languages and International Studies. I should also record a debt
to my students who helped me to complete the survey questionnaires and ESP
teachers of Hanoi College of Technology and Economics who were so enthusiastic
with me in answering interview questions and gave constructive suggestions to my
study.
Last but not least, I would like to thank my family for their understanding,
love and supports during the time I worked on this study.

ii


ABSTRACT

This study aims at designing a task-based ESP syllabus for intermediate vocational
students of information technology at Hanoi College of Technology and Economics.
The proposed syllabus was produced on the basis of learners‟ needs and target
needs analysis. Data was collected from interviews with ESP teachers and two
questionnaires for 50 undergraduate students of information technology and 30 exstudents of Hanoi College of Technology and Economics. The results of data
analysis along with the theoretical views of syllabus design are the foundation for
designing a syllabus for intermediate vocational students of information technology
at Hanoi College of Technology and Economics. This study is hoped to make some
contributions to the improvement of teaching and learning ESP at Hanoi College of
Technology and Economics.


iii


LIST OF ABBREVIATION

EAP

: English for Academic Purposes

EOP

: English for Occupational Purposes

ESP

: English for Specific Purposes

EFL

: English as a Foreign Language

GE

: General English

HNCTE

: Hanoi College of Technology and Economics

IT


: Information Technology

TBLT

: Task-based Language Teaching

iv


LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES

Figure 1.1: ESP classification by experience (Source: Robinson, 1991:3-4) ............ 5
Figure 1.2.Bases for language syllabus design (White, 1988: 46) ............................. 9
Table 1. Students‟ reasons for learning English .......................................................22
Table 2. Students‟ opinions on prospective job ........................................................23
Table 3. Students‟ anticipated possibilities to use English at work in the future .....24
Table 4. Ex-student‟s situations of using English at work ........................................26
Table 5. Student‟s opinions on tasks should be included in the course book ...........27
Table 6. Ex-students‟ opinions on tasks which should be included in the course
book ...........................................................................................................................30
Table 7. Students‟ evaluation on the current ESP course book ................................31

v


TABLE OF CONTENT

DECLARATION ........................................................................................................ i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................... ii

LIST OF ABBREVIATION ..................................................................................... iv
LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES ...........................................................................v
TABLE OF CONTENT ............................................................................................ vi
PART A: INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................1
1. Rationale ...........................................................................................................1
2. Aims and objectives of the study ......................................................................1
3. Research questions ............................................................................................2
4. Scope of the study .............................................................................................2
5. Method of the study ..........................................................................................2
6. Structure of the study ........................................................................................2
PART B: DEVELOPMENT.....................................................................................4
CHAPTER 1: LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................4
1.1.

Definitions of ESP ....................................................................................4

1.2. Types of ESP ................................................................................................5
1.3. Syllabus Design ............................................................................................6
1.3.1. Definitions of syllabus ............................................................................6
1.3.2. Approaches to ESP Syllabus Design ......................................................7
1.3.3. Types of syllabus ....................................................................................9
1.3.4. Task-based syllabus ..............................................................................12
1.3.5. Rationale for choosing Task-based syllabus .........................................15
1.3.6. Steps to design a syllabus .....................................................................15
1.3.7.
1.4.

Needs Analysis ..................................................................................15

Summary .................................................................................................18


CHAPTER 2: NEEDS ANALYSIS OF INTERMEDIATE VOCATIONAL
STUDENTS OF HANOI COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS..19

vi


2.1. The teaching and learning ESP at HNCTE ............................................19
2.2. The target students ....................................................................................20
2.3. The teaching staff ......................................................................................20
2.4. The study ....................................................................................................21
2.4.1. The subjects...........................................................................................21
2.4.2. Instruments for collecting data..............................................................21
2.4.3. Data analysis and major findings ..........................................................22
2.5. Summary ....................................................................................................35
CHAPTER

3:

THE

PROPOSED

SYLLABUS

CONTENT

FOR

INTERMEDIATE VOCATIONAL STUDENTS OF INFORMATION AND

TECHNOLOGY AT HNCTE ................................................................................36
3.1. Aims and objectives of the syllabus .........................................................36
3.2. Types of the syllabus .................................................................................36
3.3. Tasks in the syllabus..................................................................................36
3.4. The proposed syllabus ...............................................................................37
3.4.1. Time schedule .......................................................................................37
3.4.2. The organization of the syllabus ...........................................................37
3.5. Suggested teaching and assessment methodology ..................................37
3.5.1. Teaching methodology..........................................................................37
3.5.2. Assessment methodology......................................................................38
3.6. Syllabus evaluation ....................................................................................39
3.7. Summary ....................................................................................................39
PART C: CONCLUSION.......................................................................................40
1. Conclusion .........................................................................................................40
2. Limitations and suggestions for further studies ..............................................41
REFERENCES ........................................................................................................42
APPENDICES ........................................................................................................... I

vii


PART A: INTRODUCTION
1. Rationale
In the globalization era that is filled by super tight challenges and competitions,
every individual is required not only a high level of education but also a store of
skills. One of the skills that most needed today is English proficiency due to its
importance in almost every corner of our life. The demand for English in general
and English for Specific Purpose (ESP) in particular therefore becomes rising to
meet up with the increasingly interconnected and globalized world.
At Hanoi College of Technology and Economics, English is a mandatory subject

for all students coming from different departments and majors. The training
curriculum is divided into two parts: General English (GE) delivered at the first
semester and English for Specific Purposes (ESP) followed afterwards.
However, teaching ESP has confronted a number of issues including content
overload, inappropriate materials and lack of experienced ESP teachers. Among
these problems, the course book is of the most concern for the ESP department.
The current ESP book for Intermediate Vocational students of Information
Technology is compiled by Thac Binh Cuong – an experienced teacher in the
field of information technology. However, after a few years of implementation,
it has revealed lots of limitations in terms of methodology and content. The fact
shows that most students face difficulty in speaking and listening despite their
well-grasping English grammar. They also shoulder a heavy program that goes
beyond their capacity to fulfill. This gives rise to the need of creating a new
syllabus which puts learners in the central role and is tasks-surrounded. Under
such circumstance was this study given birth. Hopefully, it will make a
contribution for the improvement of English teaching at Hanoi College of
Technology and Economics.
2. Aims and objectives of the study
The overarching target of the study is to design a task-based English syllabus
for the intermediate vocational students of information technology at Hanoi

1


College of Technology and Economics. In order to achieve this planned aim,
the following objectives are set:
-

Identifying the learning needs and target needs of the intermediate
vocational students of information technology through conducting a

needs analysis.

-

Building up a task-based ESP syllabus based on learners‟ needs for
students of information technology at Hanoi College of Technology and
Economics.

3. Research questions
To fulfill the aim and the objectives as set above, the following questions are
raised for exploration:
1. What are the students‟ perceived needs of ESP?
2. How are the needs of all stakeholders transferred into tasks that will be
designed in an ESP syllabus?
4. Scope of the study
The area for this thesis is for the intermediate vocational students majoring in
information technology at HNCTE.
5. Method of the study
In order to meet up the aim mentioned above, two surveys questionnaires for
undergraduate students and ex-students of HNCTE were conducted to find out
students‟ needs and to identify tasks that should be selected in the syllabus for
the intermediate vocational students of information technology. Additionally,
informal interview with three ESP teachers was carried out to collect their
opinions of which tasks should not be missed in the syllabus. The author aims
at getting detailed answers to the questions raised in Section3; therefore, both
quantitative and qualitative methods are employed in this study.
6. Structure of the study
The study is made up of three parts:

2



 Part A is the introduction where the rationale, the aims and objectives, the
research questions, the scope, the method and the structure of the study
will be presented.
 Part B is the development comprising three chapters:
-

Chapter 1 covers literature review of ESP and syllabus design.

-

Chapter 2 presents some situational analysis of ESP teaching and learning
at HNCTE and gives descriptions of subjects of the study, instruments for
data collection and analysis of the results drawn from two questionnaires
and interviews.

-

Chapter 3 comprises ESP task-based syllabus for the intermediate
vocational students of information technology at HNCTE, methodology
of teaching, assessment and syllabus evaluation.

 Part C summarizes the main contents of the study points out limitations and
makes suggestions for further study.

3


PART B: DEVELOPMENT

CHAPTER 1: LITERATURE REVIEW
1.1.

Definitions of ESP

ESP (English for Specific Purposes) is one branch of the EFL (English as a Foreign
Language). There is a series of definitions based on researcher‟s standpoints and
approaches to the target issue or their distinctive emphases on the variety of
elements that characterize ESP.
Hutchinson and Waters (1987:21) see ESP as an approach rather that product,
which based on learners‟ needs: “ESP is an approach to language teaching which
aims to meet the needs of particular learners”. The crucial point of all ESP is to
answer the simple question: Why does this learner need to learn a foreign language?
Sharing the same point of view, Robinson (1991) also approves with the primary of
need analysis in figuring out ESP. She asserts that ESP course is based on a need
analysis that “aims to specify as closely as possible what exactly is it that students
have to do through the medium of English” (Robinsion, 1991:3).
In a closer approach to characteristics, Strevens (1988) describes ESP by making a
distinction between its absolute and variable characteristics:
- Absolute characteristics are the ESP consisting of English language teaching,
which is:
(i) Designed to respond to particular needs of the learner;
(ii) Related in content (i.e.in its themes and topics) to specific disciplines,
occupation and activities;
(iii) Centred on the language appropriate to those activities in terms of syntax,
lexis, discourse, semantics, etc.
(iv) In contrast with General English.
- Variable characteristics are the ESP which may be, but is not necessarily:
(i) Restricted as to the language skills to be learned (e.g. reading only);
(ii) Not taught according to any pre-ordained methodology.

Dudley-Evans and St John (1998: 4-5) believe that adult learners are more likely to
use ESP, whether in a professional work situation or at tertiary level context.
Moreover, ESP is normally designed for intermediate or advanced students and

4


generally offers some basic knowledge of the language system but can be utilized
by beginners.
In short, although opinions on what ESP is differ, most of the definitions above
share a common view; that is,an ESP course must be made up based on the learners‟
needs; in other words, an ESP syllabus should be designed to meet the learner‟s
demand to inspire their learning.
1.2. Types of ESP
ESP has traditionally been divided into two main branches namely English for Academic
Purposes (EAP) and English for occupational Purposes (EOP) (Munby, 1978;
Hutchinson & Waters, 1987; Dudley-Evans & St John, 1998; Robinson, 1991).
However, Hutchinson & Waters do emphasize that there is no clear distinction between
EAP and EOP because: “people can work and study simultaneously; it is likely that in
many cases the language learnt for immediate use in a study environment will be used
later when the students take up, or return to, a job”.

Figure 1.1: ESP classification by experience (Source: Robinson, 1991:3-4)
Carter (1983) groups ESP by three types: English as a restricted language, English
for academic and occupational purposes, and English with specific topics. The
language only used by engineers or by businessmen is examples for the first

5



category. In the second type, Carter takes the same point of view with Hutchinson
& Waters (1987) that EAP and EOP are not clearly distinguished and are put
together in the same type of ESP. The final one is concerned with English needs
expected in the future.
In overall, studying various types of ESP will help ESP teachers identify “target
partners” they are going to work with. This is a very first but important step on the
way of conducting a needs analysis to achieve the final goal which is designing an
appropriate ESP course for their students.
1.3. Syllabus Design
1.3.1. Definitions of syllabus
There are different views on syllabus design depending on whether the designer
adopts he narrow and broad approach to syllabus design. The nature of “the
syllabus” therefore could not come to final conclusion.
Some designers who take the broader view such as Breen (1984), Yalden (1984)
suppose that the syllabus should combine the selection of content and methodology.
In Yalden‟s (1984: 14) words, “The syllabus replaces the concept of „method‟, and
the syllabus is now seen as an instrument by which the teacher, with the help of the
syllabus designer, can achieve a degree of „fit‟ between the needs and aims of the
learner (as social being and as individual) and the activities which will take place in
the classroom”.
Sharing Yalden‟s view, Breen (1984:49) points out: “Any syllabuses will express –
however indirectly – certain assumption about language, about the psychological
process of learning, and about the pedagogic and social processes within a
classroom.”
On the contrary, Allen (1984: 61) draws a clear distinction between curriculum and
syllabus. He states: “Curriculum is a very general concept which involves
consideration of the whole complex of philosophical, social and administrative
factors which contribute to the planning of an educational program. Syllabus, on the

6



other hand, refers to that subpart of curriculum which is concerned with a
specification of what units will be taught.”
Hutchinson and Waters (1987: 80) are in favor of Allen‟s idea, stating that “A
syllabus is a document which says what will (at least what should) be learnt.
Likewise, Nunan (1988: 5) sees syllabus design as being concerned with the
selection and grading of content, whereas methodology is involved in the selection
of learning tasks and activities. Partly agreeing with Nunan, Webb (1967:20)
maintains that syllabus design is the organization of the selected contents into an
order and practical sequence for teaching purposes. He presents some criteria for
syllabus design as follows:
-

Progress from known to unknown matter

-

Appropriate size of teaching units

-

A proper variety of activity

-

Teachability

-


Creating a sense of purpose for the student.

In brief, the term “syllabus” could be defined narrowly or broadly. For designing a
task-based ESP syllabus for intermediate vocational student of information
technology under the current context of teaching and learning ESP at HNCTE, the
author will take the broad view. No matter what the designers will select to shape a
syllabus, it must be the combination of appropriate language content for the target
learners and the methodology which is able to maximize the effectiveness of the
syllabus. Obviously, the needs of learners must be stressed on because syllabus is
produced in respond to what the learners wish to gain.
1.3.2. Approaches to ESP Syllabus Design
There have existed a lot of approaches to language syllabus design up to now.
Wilkins (1976) distinguishes between analytic and synthetic approach while
Hutchinson and Waters (1987) establish three main approaches namely: the
language-centered, skills-centered and learning-centered. The latter one will be
discussed below.

7


1.3.2.1. Language-centered approach
This process is the simplest and particularly prevalent in ESP. According to
Hutchinson and Waters (1987: 65), language-centered approach “aims to draw as a
direct connection as possible between the analysis of the target situation and the
content of the ESP course”. It comes first with the learner, then going through
various stages of analysis before merging into a syllabus, turning to materials used
in the classroom and finally to assessment of mastery of the syllabus items.
This approach seems to be a very logical procedure; however, it embraces a number
of weaknesses. Firstly, it goes from the learners and their needs, but in fact is
learner-restricted, not learner-centred as the learners are merely utilized as a means

of indicating the target situation. Secondly, it appears to be a static and inflexible
process. Finally, the analysis of target situation data is only at the surface level that
could not reveal clearly about the competence underlined the performance.
1.3.2.2. Skills-centred approach
Hutchinson and Waters (1987: 69) asserts: “a skills-centred approach aims to get
away from the surface performance date and look at the competence that underlines
the performance”. It means that a skills- centred course will present its learning
objectives in performance and competence simultaneously. By this way, learners
can develop skills and strategies that will further be progressed after the ESP
course. The learners are also approached as a user of language rather than a learner
of language.
1.3.2.3. Learning-centred approach
In contrast to the learner-centered approach and the skill-centered approach, in the
learning-centered approach, according Hutchinson and Waters (1987:72), “learning
is seen as process in which the learners use what knowledge or skills they have in
order to make sense of the flow of new information”. By this approach, the learners
are taken into account carefully at every single stage of the design process. It does
not dwell on the learners‟ competence but also pointing out the route the learners
can follow to acquire that competence.

8


In short, each approach has its own advantages and drawbacks. The learningcentred approach puts emphasis on the learners‟ competence and performance while
the skills-centred approach regards learners as users rather than learners of
language. The language-centred approach over-depends on the target situation.
Taking careful consideration, I take the learning-centred approach as the foundation
for designing an ESP syllabus for the intermediate vocational students of
information technology at HNCTE.
1.3.3. Types of syllabus

There are different types of syllabuses. According to White (1988: 46), syllabus is
grouped by three main types namely content-based syllabus, skills-based syllabus
and method-based syllabus. The three above categories are further divided into subtypes of syllabus including structural/grammatical syllabus, situational syllabus,
function notional syllabus, topic-based syllabus, skills-based syllabus, task-based
syllabus and process syllabus. Details of these are represented in Figure 1.2.

Figure 1.2.Bases for language syllabus design (White, 1988: 46)

9


1.3.3.1. Structural/ Grammatical syllabus
This is the most common syllabus type, in which the selection of grading of content
is based on the complexity and simplicity of grammatical items. Nunan (1988)
states: “The transition from lesson to lesson is intended to enable material on one
lesson to prepare the ground for the next; and conversely for material in the next to
appear to grow out the previous one (McDonough 1981:21).
The core criticism of this type is to focus on only one aspect of language which is
grammar, so it reveals some weak points such as learners can get formal language
but may not communicate in real life and they may passively acquire language
designed in this syllabus. Further, this type of syllabus “misrepresented the nature
of that complex phenomenon, language, that is, formal grammar” (Nunan, 1988:30).
1.3.3.2. Functional-notional syllabus
Richards (2001: 154) states: “functional syllabus is one that is organized around
communicative function such as requesting, complaining, suggesting, agreeing. A
functional-notional syllabus assumes that language ability can be broken down into
discrete components that can be taught separately”.
In designing this type of syllabus, according to Nunan (1988: 37), “designers also
need to look beyond linguistic notion of simplicity and difficulty when it comes to
grading items.” And „However, the grading of functional items becomes much more

complex because there are few apparent objective means for deciding that one
functional item, for instance, „apologizing‟ is either simpler or more difficult than
another item as „requesting‟.‟
There are many benefits of this type because functions and notions are used in daily
life that help learners communicate easily.
1.3.3.3. Situational syllabus
Richards (2001: 156) calls “situational syllabus is one that is organized around the
language needed for different situations such as at the airport or at a hotel.”
Situational syllabuses have the privilege of presenting language in context and
teaching language of immediate practical use. The content of language is a

10


collection of situations occurring in real life. The advantage of this type is to
stimulate and motivate the learners. On the other hand, a situational syllabus will be
limited for those learners whose needs were beyond the situations in the syllabus.
1.3.3.4. Topic-based syllabus
The primary purpose of this type is to teach content of information that use the
language learned by the students. Richards (2001:157) states that topic-based
syllabus is one that is organized around themes, topics, or other units of content.
Content plays dominant role in the process of syllabus design rather than grammar,
functions or situations.
There are some outstanding advantages of this syllabus. According to Robinson
(1991: 37), “it motivates the student and a basic for the „real‟ syllabus of the
language forms, functions or whatever the course designers wish to focus on”. The
topic-based syllabus makes linguistic form more meaningful. However, with this
syllabus, it is much more challenging to monitor the scale of balance between
grammar and content or other strands. Making choice for the basic for assessment –
learning of content or learning of language is another arisen issue.

1.3.3.5. Skill-based syllabus
Richards (2001: 159) points out „skill-based syllabus is one that is organized around
the different underlying abilities that are involved in using a language for purposes
such as reading, writing, listening or speaking.‟ The purpose of this type is to learn
the specific language skill.
Its advantage is focus on behavior or performance in relation to specific tasks.
According to Brown (1995) „the strength of this type of syllabus lays on the higher
chance provided to students to develop their skill‟.
This approach, however, reveals some limitations. Richards (2001: 161), for
example, points the weakness of this type as “there is no serious basis for
determining skills” and it focuses on discrete aspects of performance rather than
developing more global and integrated communicative abilities”.

11


1.3.3.6. Process syllabus
This type of syllabus is regarded as a quite innovative one because it is chiefly
served for project work and problem-solving tasks and activities. In order to ensure
its innovative nature, content and teaching methods are discussed between the
teachers and the learners during syllabus production.
White (1988: 101) points out some weaknesses of this syllabus, namely there is no
evaluation of such model in practice and the process syllabus calls for hugely
professional competence and confidence on the part of teachers.
1.3.4. Task-based syllabus
1.3.4.1. Definition of „task‟
Task-based approach to syllabus design has attracted a great deal of attention from
researchers. According to Nunan (1988:44), “the selection of „task‟ as a basic
building block has been justified on several grounds, but most particularly for
pedagogic and psycholinguistic reason.‟ Long and Crookes (1991: 43), on the other

hand, claim that „tasks provide a vehicle for the presentation of appropriate target
language samples to learners-input which they will inevitably reshape via
application of general cognitive processing capacities‟.
Richards (2001: 162) points out two kinds of tasks: pedagogical tasks and realworld tasks. The following are tasks of this kind: jigsaw tasks, information – gap
tasks, problem solving tasks, decision – making tasks, opinion exchange tasks.
As the syllabus I attempt to design is of task-based, I will look into this type of
syllabus in more detail in the sections that follow.
1.3.4.2. Definition of task-based syllabus (Procedural syllabus)
It is a syllabus which is organized around tasks, rather than in terms of grammar or
vocabulary. Robinson (1991: 39) points out that “task-based syllabuses consists of a
set of tasks or activities ordered according to cognitive difficulty” while Richard
(2006: 31) states that task is something that learners do or carry out using their
existing language resources, which involves a focus on meaning, and on the case of
tasks involving more than one learner, the task call upon the learners.

12


The difference between task-based teaching and situation-based teaching is that
while situational teaching delivers content occurred in the situation, task-based
teaching aims at bringing students with a variety of language forms, functions, and
skills in completing the tasks and stimulating real communication in the foreign
language. Due to its advantages over the other syllabus type, “this type of syllabus
[task-based syllabus] has proved to be of great significance for ESP because of
using the medium of English” (Robinson 1991: 40).
1.3.4.3. Characteristics of task-based syllabus
A task-based syllabus is based on a task-based teaching approach in which tasks
such as solving problems, applying for a job or making a reservation are introduced.
The language learnt goes beyond the linguistic demands of the activity. A taskbased structure is built up with a series of the tasks. Therefore, instead of
emphasizing grammatical, notional-functional or any other items, the designer

should carry out a needs analysis to yield target tasks that learners will conduct in
the workplace outside the classroom‟s walls.
Here are its characteristics:
(i) Task-based instruction is very powerful and widely applicable.
(ii) Suitable for all ages and backgrounds.
(iii)

Addresses the crucial problems directly by using active and real tasks as

learning as learning activities.
(iv)

Ability to perform the tasks is equivalent to the ability to use language, so

functional ability should be the natural outcome.
(v) Can be very effective when learners are engaged in relatively similar out of
class activities.
(vi)

Useful for learners who are not accustomed to traditional type of

classroom.
1.3.4.4. Advantages of task-based syllabus
Researchers such as Nunan (1988, 2000) and Richards (1991) claim that task-based
syllabus embraces three advantages. Firstly, tasks-based syllabus is concerned with

13


adequate consideration of needs analysis as tasks are compiled based on the needs

analysis of learners, so it can fulfill their demand. “A task is a communicative
activity that does not usually have a restrictive focus on a single grammatical
structure. It also had a non-linguistic outcome” Nunan (2000). Therefore, these
tasks can wake up students‟ interest and inspiration, which both play important role
in the language acquisition. The second advantage involves authentic materials
targeted real-life context. The authentic materials and situation will promote
learners‟ ability to cope well with real problems. And lastly, task-based syllabus is
structured by a wide range of tasks. The application of a repertoire of tasks is
considered as a practical means of broadening learners‟ potential to different
situations occupationally or socially.
1.3.4.5. Limitations of task-based
Besides the strong points, this type of syllabus has revealed at least three
limitations. The biggest problem is the ambiguity of task‟s definition. Richard
(2001: 162) states “definitions of tasks are sometimes so broad to include almost
anything that involves learners doing something”. The second limitation, according
to Yalden (1997) is that “most of tasks mentioned by the advocators are referential
in nature. And there might be some tasks involve the conative function such as the
use of language to influence the action of another person”. It means that the taskbased syllabus tend to ignore other functions of language. From my point of view,
this argument against task-based language teaching seems to lack adequate
evidence. In reality, language function is portrayed through language itself.
Provided that use of language is involved, all types of language functions are
realized at the same time. It is not compulsory for the task-based syllabus or any
syllabus to make everything be covered. The final limitation regards to the grading
of the task‟s difficulty level. As is stated by Widdowson (1968: 134)“identification
of valid, user-friendly sequencing criteria is one of the oldest unsolved problems in
language teaching of all kinds”. Schinnerer-Erben even claimed that “natural
sequences do not really exist in sufficient detail to be used as the basis for a precise

14



order, nor have they been shown to facilitate learning in a second language
situation” (1981: 11).
1.3.5. Rationale for choosing Task-based syllabus
Each type of syllabus design contains both strong points and weak points.
Deciding a suitable syllabus depends on needs of learners and the priority in
teaching. Teaching and learning in HNCTE specifically link to a particular
profession. That is the reason why teaching ESP focuses on practicing skills, so a
textbook with task-based syllabus is the best choice.
1.3.6. Steps to design a syllabus
There are some mandatory steps that designers have to follow while making up a
syllabus. This procedure depends on each designer‟s view. Hughes (1983: 7)
recommends that the first crucial step must be the choice of aims and objectives
while Brown (1996), Richard (1984), and Nunan (1988) all approve that a needs
analysis should be the very first brick with other different ones. In this study, I
would like to use the following steps for designing an ESP syllabus for intermediate
vocational students majoring in information technology at HNCTE:
(i)

Needs analysis

(ii)

Goals and objectives determining

(iii)

Tasks selecting and grading

(iv)


Organization of tasks

1.3.7. Needs Analysis
1.3.7.1.

The importance of needs analysis

In accordance with the development of ESP, there is an emerging tendency that
students‟ needs must be examined in the design of syllabuses. To establish a
workable syllabus design, needs analysis is suggested as the most careful concern
from which the shape of the syllabus is formed. According to John (1984), need
analysis comes to be regarded as an essential step, especially in the design of
courses in ESP.

15


1.3.7.2.

Definition of needs and needs analysis

In Windowson‟s (1982: 2) words, needs refer to students‟ study or job
requirements, which are what they have to do at the end of the course. “The term
needs is not as straightforward as it might appear, and hence the term is sometimes
used to refer to wants, desires, demand, expectation, motivation, lacks, constraints,
and requirements” (Brindley, 1984: 28).
Nunan (1988: 75) states: “needs analysis refers to a family of procedures for
gathering information about learners and about communication tasks for use in
syllabus designed” whilst Dudley-Evans (1998: 122) supposes “Need analysis is

neither to language teaching – need assessment, for example, is the basic of training
programs and aid-development programs – nor, within language training, is it
unique to LSP and thus to ESP”.
According to Richards (2001: 57), „Target population in a needs analysis refers to
the people about whom information will be collected‟. That is the reason why it
must be analyzed to determine the focus of English in context of a particular school.
Richard also points out that an important principle of ESP approach to language
teaching is that the purposes for which a learner needs a language rather than a
syllabus reflecting the structure of general English.
1.3.7.3. Types of needs
a. Target Needs
Target needs are something of an umbrella term, which in practice hides a
number of important distinctions. It is more useful to look at the target situation in
term of necessities, lacks and wants as Hutchinson and Waters (1987:55). They give
definitions of these three terms as follows:
Necessities are a type of need determined by the demands of the target situation.
Lacks mean the needs to know what the learners have known already so that the
course is decided which necessities the learner lacks. Wants are considered as what
learners‟ needs are. There are a number ways in which information can be gathered

16


×