Bridge Design
www.engreferencebooks.com
Bridge Design
Concepts and Analysis
António J. Reis
IST – University of Lisbon and Technical Director GRID Consulting Engineers
Lisbon
Portugal
José J. Oliveira Pedro
IST – University of Lisbon and GRID Consulting Engineers
Lisbon
Portugal
www.engreferencebooks.com
This edition first published 2019
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or
transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise,
except as permitted by law. Advice on how to obtain permission to reuse material from this title is available
at />The right of António J. Reis and José J. Oliveira Pedro to be identified as the authors of this work has been
asserted in accordance with law.
Registered Offices
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA
John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK
Editorial Office
The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK
For details of our global editorial offices, customer services, and more information about Wiley products
visit us at www.wiley.com.
Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats and by print‐on‐demand. Some content that
appears in standard print versions of this book may not be available in other formats.
Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty
While the publisher and authors have used their best efforts in preparing this work, they make no
representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this work and
specifically disclaim all warranties, including without limitation any implied warranties of merchantability
or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales representatives, written
sales materials or promotional statements for this work. The fact that an organization, website, or product
is referred to in this work as a citation and/or potential source of further information does not mean that
the publisher and authors endorse the information or services the organization, website, or product may
provide or recommendations it may make. This work is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not
engaged in rendering professional services. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable
for your situation. You should consult with a specialist where appropriate. Further, readers should be aware
that websites listed in this work may have changed or disappeared between when this work was written
and when it is read. Neither the publisher nor authors shall be liable for any loss of profit or any other
commercial damages, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or other damages.
Library of Congress Cataloging‐in‐Publication Data
Names: Reis, António J., 1949– author. | Oliveira Pedro, José J., 1968– author.
Title: Bridge design : concepts and analysis / António J. Reis, IST – University of Lisbon and Technical
Director GRID Consulting Engineers, Lisbon, José J. Oliveira Pedro, IST – University of Lisbon and GRID
Consulting Engineers, Lisbon.
Description: First edition. | Hoboken, NJ : John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2019. | Identifiers: LCCN 2018041508
(print) | LCCN 2018042493 (ebook) | ISBN 9781118927656 (Adobe PDF) | ISBN 9781118927649 (ePub) |
ISBN 9780470843635 (hardback)
Subjects: LCSH: Bridges–Design and construction.
Classification: LCC TG300 (ebook) | LCC TG300 .R45 2019 (print) | DDC 624.2/5–dc23
LC record available at />Cover Design: Wiley
Cover Image: © Ana Isabel Silva
Set in 10/12pt Warnock by SPi Global, Pondicherry, India
Printed in the UK by Bell & Bain Ltd, Glasgow
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
www.engreferencebooks.com
v
Contents
About the Authors xiii
Preface xv
Acknowledgements xvii
1Introduction
1
1.1Generalities 1
1.2Definitions and Terminology 1
1.3Bridge Classification 4
1.4Bridge Typology 6
1.5Some Historical References 16
1.5.1 Masonry Bridges 16
1.5.2 Timber Bridges 18
1.5.3 Metal Bridges 18
1.5.4 Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete Bridges 24
1.5.5 Cable Supported Bridges 28
References 30
Bridge Design: Site Data and Basic Conditions 31
2.1Design Phases and Methodology 31
2.2Basic Site Data 32
2.2.1Generalities
32
2.2.2 Topographic Data 32
2.2.3 Geological and Geotechnical Data 35
2.2.4 Hydraulic Data 36
2.2.5 Other Data 38
2.3Bridge Location. Alignment, Bridge Length and Hydraulic Conditions 38
2.3.1 The Horizontal and Vertical Alignments 42
2.3.2 The Transverse Alignment 46
2.4Elements Integrated in Bridge Decks 49
2.4.1 Road Bridges 49
2.4.1.1 Surfacing and Deck Waterproofing 50
2.4.1.2 Walkways, Parapets and Handrails 50
2.4.1.3 Fascia Beams 53
2.4.1.4 Drainage System 54
2
www.engreferencebooks.com
vi
Contents
2.4.1.5 Lighting System 55
2.4.1.6 Expansion Joints 55
2.4.2
Railway Decks 58
2.4.2.1 Track System 59
2.4.2.2 Power Traction System (Catenary System) 61
2.4.2.3 Footways, Parapets/Handrails, Drainage and Lighting Systems 61
References 61
Actions and Structural Safety 63
3.1Types of Actions and Limit State Design 63
3.2Permanent Actions 65
3.3Highway Traffic Loading – Vertical Forces 68
3.4Braking, Acceleration and Centrifugal Forces in Highway Bridges 72
3.5Actions on Footways or Cycle Tracks and Parapets, of Highway Bridges 74
3.6Actions for Abutments and Walls Adjacent
to Highway Bridges 75
3.7Traffic Loads for Railway Bridges 76
3.7.1General
76
3.7.2
Load Models 76
3.8Braking, Acceleration and Centrifugal Forces in Railway Bridges:
Nosing Forces 77
3.9Actions on Maintenance Walkways and Earth Pressure Effects
for Railway Bridges 78
3.10Dynamic Load Effects 79
3.10.1
Basic Concepts 79
3.10.2
Dynamic Effects for Railway Bridges 82
3.11Wind Actions and Aerodynamic Stability of Bridges 84
3.11.1
Design Wind Velocities and Peak Velocities Pressures 84
3.11.2
Wind as a Static Action on Bridge Decks and Piers 89
3.11.3
Aerodynamic Response: Basic Concepts 91
3.11.3.1 Vortex Shedding 94
3.11.3.2 Divergent Amplitudes: Aerodynamic Instability 95
3.12Hydrodynamic Actions 98
3.13Thermal Actions and Thermal Effects 99
3.13.1
Basic Concepts 99
3.13.2
Thermal Effects 102
3.13.3
Design Values 107
3.14Shrinkage, Creep and Relaxation in Concrete Bridges 109
3.15Actions Due to Imposed Deformations. Differential Settlements 117
3.16Actions Due to Friction in Bridge Bearings 119
3.17Seismic Actions 119
3.17.1
Basis of Design 119
3.17.2
Response Spectrums for Bridge Seismic Analysis 121
3.18Accidental Actions 124
3.19Actions During Construction 124
3.20Basic Criteria for Bridge Design 125
References 125
3
www.engreferencebooks.com
Contents
4
Conceptual Design and Execution Methods 129
4.1Concept Design: Introduction 129
4.2Span Distribution and Deck Continuity 131
4.2.1 Span Layout 131
4.2.2 Deck Continuity and Expansion Joints 132
4.3The Influence of the Execution Method 134
4.3.1 A Prestressed Concrete Box Girder Deck 134
4.3.2 A Steel‐Concrete Composite Steel Deck 136
4.3.3 Concept Design and Execution: Preliminary Conclusions 136
4.4Superstructure: Concrete Bridges 138
4.4.1 Options for the Bridge Deck 138
4.4.2 The Concrete Material – Main Proprieties 139
4.4.2.1Concrete 139
4.4.2.2 Reinforcing Steel 140
4.4.2.3 Prestressing Steel 140
4.4.3 Slab and Voided Slab Decks 142
4.4.4 Ribbed Slab and Slab‐Girder Decks 144
4.4.5 Precasted Slab‐Girder Decks 152
4.4.6 Box Girder Decks 155
4.5Superstructure: Steel and Steel‐Concrete Composite Bridges 160
4.5.1 Options for Bridge Type: Plated Structures 160
4.5.2 Steels for Metal Bridges and Corrosion Protection 166
4.5.2.1 Materials and Weldability 166
4.5.2.2 Corrosion Protection 172
4.5.3 Slab Deck: Concrete Slabs and Orthotropic Plates 173
4.5.3.1 Concrete Slab Decks 174
4.5.3.2 Steel Orthotropic Plate Decks 176
4.5.4 Plate Girder Bridges 179
4.5.4.1 Superstructure Components 179
4.5.4.2 Preliminary Design of the Main Girders 182
4.5.4.3 Vertical Bracing System 188
4.5.4.4 Horizontal Bracing System 191
4.5.5 Box Girder Bridges 192
4.5.5.1General 192
4.5.5.2 Superstructure Components 193
4.5.5.3 Pre‐Design of Composite Box Girder Sections 196
4.5.5.4 Pre‐Design of Diaphragms or Cross Frames 199
4.5.6 Typical Steel Quantities 201
4.6Superstructure: Execution Methods 202
4.6.1 General Aspects 202
4.6.2 Execution Methods for Concrete Decks 203
4.6.2.1General 203
4.6.2.2 Scaffoldings and Falseworks 203
4.6.2.3 Formwork Launching Girders 206
4.6.2.4 Incremental Launching 206
4.6.2.5 Cantilever Construction 212
4.6.2.6 Precasted Segmental Cantilever Construction 221
www.engreferencebooks.com
vii
viii
Contents
4.6.2.7 Other Methods 222
4.6.3 Erection Methods for Steel and Composite Bridges 223
4.6.3.1 Erection Methods, Transport and Erection Joints 223
4.6.3.2 Erection with Cranes Supported from the Ground 224
4.6.3.3 Incremental Launching 224
4.6.3.4 Erection by the Cantilever Method 227
4.6.3.5 Other Methods 227
4.7Substructure: Conceptual Design and Execution Methods 229
4.7.1 Elements and Functions 229
4.7.2 Bridge Piers 229
4.7.2.1 Structural Materials and Pier Typology 229
4.7.2.2 Piers Pre‐Design 232
4.7.2.3 Execution Method of the Deck and Pier Concept Design 233
4.7.2.4 Construction Methods for Piers 240
4.7.3Abutments
241
4.7.3.1 Functions of the Abutments 241
4.7.3.2 Abutment Concepts and Typology 241
4.7.4 Bridge Foundations 245
4.7.4.1 Foundation Typology 245
4.7.4.2 Direct Foundations 245
4.7.4.3 Pile Foundations 246
4.7.4.4 Special Bridge Foundations 247
4.7.4.5 Bridge Pier Foundations in Rivers 250
References 251
5
Aesthetics and Environmental Integration 255
5.1Introduction 255
5.2Integration and Formal Aspects 256
5.3Bridge Environment 256
5.4Shape and Function 258
5.5Order and Continuity 260
5.6Slenderness and Transparency 262
5.7Symmetries, Asymmetries and Proximity
with Other Bridges 266
5.8Piers Aesthetics 267
5.9Colours, Shadows, and Detailing 268
5.10Urban Bridges 272
References 277
6
Superstructure: Analysis and Design 279
6.1Introduction 279
6.2Structural Models 280
6.3Deck Slabs 283
6.3.1General
283
6.3.2 Overall Bending: Shear Lag Effects 283
6.3.3 Local Bending Effects: Influence Surfaces 287
6.3.4 Elastic Restraint of Deck Slabs 295
www.engreferencebooks.com
Contents
6.3.5 Transverse Prestressing of Deck Slabs 297
6.3.6 Steel Orthotropic Plate Decks 300
6.4Transverse Analysis of Bridge Decks 301
6.4.1 Use of Influence Lines for Transverse Load Distribution 301
6.4.2 Transverse Load Distribution Coefficients for Load Effects 302
6.4.3 Transverse Load Distribution Methods 303
6.4.3.1 Rigid Cross Beam Methods: Courbon Method 304
6.4.3.2 Transverse Load Distribution on Cross Beams 307
6.4.3.3 Extensions of the Courbon Method: Influence of Torsional Stiffness
of Main Girders and Deformability of Cross Beams 307
6.4.3.4 The Orthotropic Plate Approach 308
6.4.3.5 Other Transverse Load Distribution Methods 313
6.5Deck Analysis by Grid and FEM Models 313
6.5.1 Grid Models 313
6.5.1.1Fundamentals 313
6.5.1.2 Deck Modelling 315
6.5.1.3 Properties of Beam Elements in Grid Models 317
6.5.1.4 Limitations and Extensions of Plane Grid Modelling 318
6.5.2 FEM Models 318
6.5.2.1Fundamentals 318
6.5.2.2 FEM for Analysis of Bridge Decks 323
6.6Longitudinal Analysis of the Superstructure 329
6.6.1 Generalities – Geometrical Non‐Linear Effects: Cables and Arches 329
6.6.2 Frame and Arch Effects 332
6.6.3 Effect of Longitudinal Variation of Cross Sections 334
6.6.4 Torsion Effects in Bridge Decks – Non‐Uniform Torsion 336
6.6.5 Torsion in Steel‐Concrete Composite Decks 343
6.6.5.1 Composite Box Girder Decks 343
6.6.5.2 Composite Plate Girder Decks 345
6.6.5.3 Transverse Load Distribution in Open Section Decks 348
6.6.6 Curved Bridges 350
6.6.6.1 Statics of Curved Bridges 350
6.6.6.2 Simply Supported Curved Bridge Deck 352
6.6.6.3 Approximate Method 353
6.6.6.4 Bearing System and Deck Elongations 353
6.7Influence of Construction Methods on Superstructure Analysis 355
6.7.1 Span by Span Erection of Prestressed Concrete Decks 356
6.7.2 Cantilever Construction of Prestressed Concrete Decks 357
6.7.3 Prestressed Concrete Decks with Prefabricated Girders 360
6.7.4 Steel‐Concrete Composite Decks 361
6.8Prestressed Concrete Decks: Design Aspects 364
6.8.1Generalities
364
6.8.2 Design Concepts and Basic Criteria 364
6.8.3Durability
364
6.8.4 Concept of Partial Prestressed Concrete (PPC) 364
6.8.5 Particular Aspects of Bridges Built by Cantilevering 365
6.8.6 Ductility and Precasted Segmental Construction 366
www.engreferencebooks.com
ix
x
Contents
6.8.6.1 Internal and External Prestressing 367
6.8.7
Hyperstatic Prestressing Effects 367
6.8.8
Deflections, Vibration and Fatigue 368
6.9Steel and Composite Decks 373
6.9.1Generalities
373
6.9.2
Design Criteria for ULS 373
6.9.3
Design Criteria for SLS 375
6.9.3.1 Stress Limitations and Web Breathing 376
6.9.3.2 Deflection Limitations and Vibrations 377
6.9.4
Design Criteria for Fatigue Limit State 377
6.9.5
Web Design of Plate and Box Girder Sections 383
6.9.5.1 Web Under in Plane Bending and Shear Forces 383
6.9.5.2 Flange Induced Buckling 385
6.9.5.3 Webs Under Patch Loading 387
6.9.5.4 Webs under Interaction of Internal Forces 389
6.9.6
Transverse Web Stiffeners 390
6.9.7
Stiffened Panels in Webs and Flanges 391
6.9.8Diaphragms
394
6.10Reference to Special Bridges: Bowstring Arches and Cable‐Stayed
Bridges 395
6.10.1Generalities
395
6.10.2
Bowstring Arch Bridges 396
6.10.2.1 Geometry, Slenderness and Stability 396
6.10.2.2 Hanger System and Anchorages 402
6.10.2.3 Analysis of the Superstructure 403
6.10.3
Cable‐Stayed Bridges 404
6.10.3.1 Basic Concepts 404
6.10.3.2 Total and Partial Adjustment Staying Options 408
6.10.3.3 Deck Slenderness, Static and Aerodynamic Stability 411
6.10.3.4 Stays and Stay Cable Anchorages 414
6.10.3.5 Analysis of the Superstructure 416
References 418
Substructure: Analysis and Design 423
7.1Introduction 423
7.2Distribution of Forces Between Piers and Abutments 423
7.2.1
Distribution of a Longitudinal Force 423
7.2.2
Action Due to Imposed Deformations 424
7.2.3
Distribution of a Transverse Horizontal Force 425
7.2.4
Effect of Deformation of Bearings and Foundations 429
7.3Design of Bridge Bearings 430
7.3.1
Bearing Types 430
7.3.2
Elastomeric Bearings 430
7.3.3
Neoprene‐Teflon Bridge Bearings 434
7.3.4
Elastomeric ‘Pot Bearings’ 435
7.3.5
Metal Bearings 437
Concrete Hinges 439
7.3.6
7
www.engreferencebooks.com
Contents
7.4Reference to Seismic Devices 441
7.4.1Concept
441
7.4.2 Seismic Dampers 441
7.5Abutments: Analysis and Design 444
7.5.1 Actions and Design Criteria 444
7.5.2 Front and Wing Walls 446
7.5.3 Anchored Abutments 448
7.6Bridge Piers: Analysis and Design 449
7.6.1 Basic Concepts 449
7.6.1.1Pre‐design 449
7.6.1.2 Slenderness and Elastic Critical Load 449
7.6.1.3 The Effect of Geometrical Initial Imperfections 450
7.6.1.4 The Effect of Cracking in Concrete Bridge Piers 450
7.6.1.5 Bridge Piers as ‘Beam Columns’ 451
7.6.1.6 The Effect of Imposed Displacements 452
7.6.1.7 The Overall Stability of a Bridge Structure 453
7.6.1.8 Design Bucking Length of Bridge Piers 453
7.6.2 Elastic Analysis of Bridge Piers 454
7.6.3 Elastoplastic Analysis of Bridge Piers: Ultimate Resistance 459
7.6.4 Creep Effects on Concrete Bridge Piers 465
7.6.5 Analysis of Bridge Piers by Numerical Methods 465
7.6.6 Overall Stability of a Bridge Structure 471
References 473
Design Examples: Concrete and Composite Options 475
8.1Introduction 475
8.2Basic Data and Bridge Options 475
8.2.1 Bridge Function and Layout 475
8.2.2 Typical Deck Cross Sections 476
8.2.3 Piers, Abutments and Foundations 477
8.2.4 Materials Adopted 477
8.2.4.1 Prestressed Concrete Deck 478
8.2.4.2 Steel‐concrete Composite Deck 481
8.2.5 Deck Construction 481
8.3Hazard Scenarios and Actions 481
8.3.1 Limit States and Structural Safety 482
8.3.2Actions
482
8.3.2.1 Permanent Actions and Imposed Deformations 482
8.3.2.2 Variable Actions 484
8.4Prestressed Concrete Solution 486
8.4.1 Preliminary Design of the Deck 486
8.4.2 Structural Analysis and Slab Checks 486
8.4.3 Structural Analysis of the Main Girders 492
8.4.3.1 Traffic Loads: Transverse and Longitudinal Locations 493
8.4.3.2 Internal Forces 497
8.4.3.3 Prestressing Layout and Hyperstatic Effects 497
8.4.3.4 Influence of the Construction Stages 498
8
www.engreferencebooks.com
xi
xii
Contents
8.4.4 Structural Safety Checks: Longitudinal Direction 498
8.4.4.1 Decompression Limit State – Prestressing Design 498
8.4.4.2 Ultimate Limit States – Bending and Shear Resistance 501
8.5Steel–Concrete Composite Solution 502
8.5.1 Preliminary Design of the Deck 502
8.5.2 Structural Analysis and Slab Design Checks 503
8.5.3 Structural Analysis of the Main Girders 503
8.5.3.1 Traffic Loads Transverse and Longitudinal Positioning 504
8.5.3.2 Internal Forces 505
8.5.3.3 Shrinkage Effects 505
8.5.3.4 Imposed Deformation Effect 506
8.5.3.5 Influence of the Construction Stages 506
8.5.4 Safety Checks: Longitudinal Direction 507
8.5.4.1 Ultimate Limit States – Bending and Shear Resistance 507
8.5.4.2 Serviceability Limit States – Stresses and Crack Widths Control 509
References 510
Annex A: Buckling and Ultimate Strength of Flat Plates 511
A.1Critical Stresses and Buckling Modes of Flat Plates 511
A.1.1 Plate Simply Supported along the four Edges and under
a Uniform Compression (ψ = 1) 511
A.1.2 Bending of Long Rectangular Plates Supported at both Longitudinal Edges or
with a Free Edge 513
A.1.3 Buckling of Rectangular Plates under Shear 513
A.2Buckling of Stiffened Plates 514
A.2.1 Plates with One Longitudinal Stiffener at the Centreline under Uniform
Compression 515
A.2.2 Plate with Two Stiffeners under Uniform Compression 516
A.2.3 Plates with Three or More Longitudinal Stiffeners 517
A.2.4 Stiffened Plates under Variable Compression. Approximate Formulas 518
A.3Post‐Buckling Behaviour and Ultimate Strength of Flat Plates 518
A.3.1 Effective Width Concept 519
A.3.2 Effective Width Formulas 520
References 523
Index
525
www.engreferencebooks.com
xiii
About the Authors
António J. Reis became a Civil Engineer at IST – University of Lisbon in 1972 and
obtained his Ph.D at the University of Waterloo in Canada in 1977. He was Science
Research Fellow at the University of Surrey, UK, and Professor of Bridges and Structural
Engineering at the University of Lisbon for more than 35 years. Reis was also Visiting
Professor at EPFL Lausanne Switzerland in 2013 and 2015. In 1980, he established his
own design office GRID where he is currently Technical Director and was responsible
for the design of more than 200 bridges. The academic and design experience were
always combined in developing and supervising research studies and innovative design
aspects in the field of steel and concrete bridges, cable stayed bridges, long span roofs
and stability of steel structures. A. Reis has design studies and projects in more than
20 countries, namely in Europe, Middle East and Africa and presented more than 150
publications. He received several awards at international level from IABSE, ECCS, ICE
and Royal Academy of Sciences of Belgium.
José J. Oliveira Pedro became a Civil Engineer at IST – University of Lisbon in 1991,
concluding his Master’s degree in 1995 and Ph.D in 2007, with the thesis “Structural
analysis of composite steel-concrete cable-stayed bridges”. He joined the Civil
Engineering Department of IST in 1990, as a Student Lecturer, and is currently Assistant
Professor of Bridges, Design of Structures and Special Structures. In 1999, he was
Researcher at Liège University / Bureau d’Etudes Greisch and, in 2015, Visiting Professor
at EPFL Lausanne. In 1991, he joined design office GRID Consulting Engineers, and
since then is very much involved in the structural design of bridges and viaducts, stadiums, long span halls and other large structures. He is the author/co-author of over
seventy publications in scientific journals and conference proceedings. In 2013, he
received the Baker medal, and in 2017 the John Henry Garrood King Medal, from the
Institute of Civil Engineers, for the best papers published in Bridge Engineering journal.
www.engreferencebooks.com
xv
Preface
About 15 years ago, the first author, A. J. Reis, was invited by Wiley to write a book on
Bridge Design that could be adopted as textbook for bridge courses and as a guideline
for bridge engineers. The author’s bridge course notes from the University of Lisbon,
updated over almost 30 years, were the basis for this book. For different reasons, the
completion of the book was successively postponed until a final joint effort with the
second author, J. J. Oliveira Pedro, made this long project a reality. The book mainly
reflects the long design experience of the authors and their academic lecturing and
research activities.
Bridge design is a multidisciplinary activity. It requires a good knowledge and understanding of a variety of aspects well beyond structural engineering. Road and railway
design, geotechnical and hydraulic engineering, urban planning or environmental
impact and landscape integration are key aspects. Architectural, aesthetic and environmental aspects are nowadays recognized as main engineering issues for bridge designers. However, these subjects cannot be studied independently of structural and
construction aspects, such as the bridge erection method. On the other hand, what
differentiates bridge design from building design, for example, is generally the role of
the bridge engineer as a leader of the design process. Hence, the first aim of this book is
to present an overview on all these aspects, discussing from the first bridge concepts to
analysis in a unified approach to bridge design.
The choice of structural materials and the options for a specific bridge type are part
of the design process. Therefore, the second aim of the book is to discuss concepts and
principles of bridge design for the most common cases – steel, concrete or composite
bridges. Good bridge concepts should be based on simple models, reflecting the structural behaviour and justifying design options. Sophisticated modelling nowadays adopts
available software, most useful at advanced stages of the design process. However, it
should be borne in mind that complex modelling does not make necessarily a good
bridge concept.
The methodology to select the appropriate bridge typology and structural material is
discussed in the first four chapters of this book. Examples, mainly from the authors’
design experiences, are included. General aspects and bridge design data are presented
in Chapter 2. Actions on bridges are included in Chapter 3 with reference to the
Eurocodes. Structural safety concepts for bridge structures and limit state design
criteria are also outlined in this chapter. Chapter 4 includes the conceptual design of
bridge super‐ and substructures. Basic concepts for prestressed concrete, steel or steel
www.engreferencebooks.com
xvi
Preface
concrete composite bridges, with slab, slab‐girder and box girder decks are dealt with.
These topics are discussed in relation to superstructures and execution methods such
as classical falsework, formwork launching girders, incremental launching and balanced
cantilevering. Bridge substructures are referred to in Chapter 4 as well, namely for the
basic typologies of bridge piers, abutments and foundations.
Architectural, environmental, and aesthetic aspects that could be adopted as primary
guidelines when developing a bridge concept are addressed in Chapter 5. Principles are
explained on the basis of design cases from the authors’ design practices. Of course, this
could have been done on the basis of many other bridges. However, it is sometimes
difficult to comment on bridge aesthetics while not being aware of design, cost or
execution constraints faced by other designers.
Specific aspects of structural analysis and design are dealt with in Chapters 6 and 7.
Particular reference is made in Chapter 6 to simplified approaches to the preliminary
superstructure design. These approaches can also be adopted to check results from
sophisticated numerical models at the detailed design stages. The influence of the
erection method on structural analysis and design of prestressed concrete, steel and
composite bridge superstructures is considered in Chapter 6. Particular reference is
made to safety during construction stages and redistribution of internal forces due to
time dependent effects. Chapter 6 ends with some design concepts and analysis for
bowstring arch bridges and cable-stayed bridges. Of course, due to the scope of the
book, the aspects dealt with for these specific bridge types are introductory in nature.
The substructure structural analysis and design is presented in Chapter 7. The distribution of horizontal forces between piers and abutments due to thermal, wind and
earthquake actions is discussed. Stability of bridge piers and reinforced concrete design
aspects are dealt with. Bridge bearing typologies and specifications are introduced.
Particular reference is made to bridge seismic isolation and different types of seismic
isolation devices are presented.
The book ends with Chapter 8, which presents a simple design case with two different
superstructure solutions – a prestressed concrete deck and a steel‐concrete composite
deck. The application of design principles presented throughout the book is outlined.
The authors expect readers may find this book useful and in some way it will contribute to bridges reflecting the ‘art of structural engineering’.
António J. Reis and José J. Oliveira Pedro
Lisbon, May 2018
www.engreferencebooks.com
xvii
Acknowledgements
This book is the result of the authors’ activities at IST–University of Lisbon and at
GRID Consulting Engineers. The support of both institutions is a pleasure to
acknowledge and special thanks are due to Professor Francisco Virtuoso from IST and
to our colleagues from GRID.
During 45 years of professional life as designer, the first author, A. Reis, had the
privilege of meeting a few outstanding bridge engineers. Particular reference is made to
Jean Marie Cremer, from Bureau d’Études Greisch, with whom A. Reis had the pleasure
of working with on a few bridge projects but, most important, developing a friendship with.
Part of this book was written by the first author, A. Reis, during his stays in 2013 and
2015 as Visiting Professor at EPFL École Polytechnique Féderale de Lausanne,
Switzerland. The second author, J. Pedro, had a similar opportunity in 2015. Thanks are
due to EPFL and, in particular, to Professor Alain Nussbaumer for these opportunities.
The authors are also grateful to all sources and organizations allowing the reproduction of some figures and pictures with due credit referenced in the text.
Last, but not least, thanks are due to our families for the time this book has taken
from being with them.
António J. Reis and José J. Oliveira Pedro
Lisbon, May 2018
www.engreferencebooks.com
1
1
Introduction
1.1 Generalities
Bridges are one of the most attractive structures in the field of Civil Engineering, creating
aesthetical judgements from society and deserving, in many cases, the Latin designation
in the French language of Ouvrages d’Art.
Firstly, a set of definitions and appropriated terminology related to bridge structures
is established before discussing bridge design concepts. A short historical view of the
topic is included in this chapter to introduce the reader to the bridge field, going from
basic concepts and design methods to construction technology.
A bridge cannot be designed without an appropriated knowledge of general
concepts that go well beyond the field of structural analysis and design. The concept
for a bridge requires from the designer a general knowledge of other aspects, such as
environmental and aesthetic concepts, urban planning, landscape integration,
hydraulic and geotechnical engineering.
The designer very often has to discuss specific problems for a bridge design concept
with specialists in other fields, such as the ones previously mentioned, as well as from
aspects of more closely related fields like highway or railway engineering.
Introducing the reader to the relationships between all the fields related to bridge
design, from the development of the bridge concept to more specific aspects of bridge
construction methods, is one of the aims of this book.
Most of the bridge examples are based on design projects developed at the author’s
design office. Some of these design cases have been summarized in the chapters in
order to illustrate the basic concepts developed throughout the book.
1.2 Definitions and Terminology
A bridge may be defined as a structure to traverse an obstacle, namely a river, a valley, a
roadway or a railway. The general term bridge is very often left for the first case, that is,
a structure over a river leaving the more specific term of viaduct for bridges over valleys
or over other obstacles. So, the relevance of the structure very often related to its length
or main span has nothing to do with the use of the terms bridge or viaduct. One may
have bridges of only 20 m length and viaducts 3 or 4 km long. In highway bridge
terminology, it is usual to differentiate between viaducts passing over or under a main
Bridge Design: Concepts and Analysis, First Edition. António J. Reis and José J. Oliveira Pedro.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Published 2019 by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
www.engreferencebooks.com
2
Bridge Design: Concepts and Analysis
road by designating them as overpasses or underpasses. So, one shall adopt the term
‘bridge’ to designate bridges in particular, or viaducts. Figure 1.1 shows a bridge over the
river Douro that is 703 m long, 36 m width for eight traffic lanes and has a main span of
150 m, and also a viaduct in Madeira Island, 600 m long for four traffic lanes and with a
typical span of 45 m. The decks of these structures are made of two parallel box girders
supported by independent piers.
(a)
(b)
Figure 1.1 (a) The Freixo Bridge over the river Douro in Oporto, 1993, and (b) a viaduct in Madeira
Island, Portugal, 1997 (Source: Courtesy GRID, SA).
www.engreferencebooks.com
Introduction
In Europe, important bridges have been built over the sea in recent years, such as
fixed links across large stretches of water, for example, the Öresund Bridge (7.8 km long)
between Sweden and Denmark, and the Vasco da Gama Bridge (12 km long) in the
Tagus river estuary, Lisbon, shown in Figure 1.2.
Many of these structures include main spans as part of cable‐stayed or suspension bridges and many typical spans repeated along offshore or inland areas. If
that occurs over the riversides, it is usual to designate that part of the bridge the
approach viaduct.
(a)
(b)
Figure 1.2 (a) The Öresund link between Sweden and Denmark, 2000 (Source: Soerfm, http://
commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Öresund_Bridge_‐_Öresund_crop.jpg#mediaviewer/File:Öresund_
Bridge_‐_Öresund_crop.jpg. CC BY‐SA 3.0.), and (b) the Vasco da Gama Bridge, in Lisbon, Portugal,
1998 (Source: Photograph by José Araujo).
www.engreferencebooks.com
3
4
Bridge Design: Concepts and Analysis
A bridge integrates two main parts:
●●
●●
the superstructure; the part traversing the obstacle and
the substructure; the part supporting the superstructure and transferring its loads to
the ground through the foundations.
The superstructure is basically made of a deck transferring the loads to the piers by
bearings or by a rigid connection between the deck and the pier; the substructure
includes the piers, foundations and the abutments, as shown in Figure 1.3. The piers
transfer the loads from the superstructure due to permanent and variable actions,
namely dead weight, traffic loads, thermal, wind and earthquake action, to the foundations.
The abutments establish the transition between the superstructure and the earthfill of the
highway or the railway and retain the filling material. The abutments transfer the loads
induced by the superstructure, generally transmitted by the bearings, and supporting the
soil impulses generated by the embankments.
The deck is, in general, supported by a set of bearings, some located at the abutments,
as previously referred to, and others located at the top of the piers as shown in Figure 1.3.
Nowadays, these bearings are generally made of elastomeric materials (natural rubber
or synthetic rubber – chloroprene) and steel.
The foundations of the bridge piers and abutments may be by footings, as in Figure 1.3
(shallow foundations) or by piles (deep foundations). A different type of foundation
include caissons made by lowering precasted segmental elements in a previous excavated soil, a method adopted sometimes for deep bridge piers foundations in rivers.
1.3 Bridge Classification
Bridges may be classified according several criteria namely:
●●
●●
●●
the bridge function, dependent on the type of use of the bridge, giving rise to designations of highway or railway bridges, canal bridges for the transportation of water,
quay bridges in ports, runway or taxiway bridges in airports, pedestrian bridges or
pipeline bridges. The function of the bridge may be twofold as for example in the case
of the Oresund Bridge, for railway and highway traffic (Figure 1.2).
the bridge structural material, like masonry bridges, as used in the old days since the
Romans, timber bridges, metal bridges in steel or aluminium or in iron as adopted in
the nineteenth century, concrete bridges either in reinforced concrete or prestressed
concrete (more precisely, partially prestressed concrete as preferred nowadays) and,
more recently, composite steel‐concrete bridges.
the bridge structural system, which may be distinguished by:
–– the longitudinal structural system;
–– the transversal structural system.
The former, the longitudinal system, gives rise to beam bridges, frame bridges,
arch bridges and cable supported bridges; namely, cable‐stayed bridges and suspension bridges. The last, the transversal structural system, is characterized by the type
adopted for the cross section of the superstructure, namely slab, girder or box girder
bridges. A preliminary discussion on bridge structural systems is presented in next
section.
www.engreferencebooks.com
(a)
Superstructure
270.00
P1 (SOUTH)
116.99
30.00
SPAN 1
P2
117.14
35.00
SPAN 2
P3
117.31
104.0
104.0
105.0
35.00
SPAN 3
P4
117.49
ORIGINAL
EARTHFILL
35.00
SPAN 4
P5
117.66
35.00
SPAN 5
P6
117.84
P7
118.01
104.0
104.0
102.0
35.00
SPAN 6
104.0
35.00
SPAN 7
P8
30.00
SPAN 8
118.19
P9 (NORTH)
118.34
103.7
103.0
AVERAGE
ROCK LEVEL
[m]
Abutment
Piers and foundations
(b)
11.40 m
0.50
3.60
Carriageway
HOR. ALIGN.
1.60
Sidewalk
2.05
0.50
0.40
0.96
0.75
2.5%
2.12
2.05
2.5%
C
L
0.40
3.60
Carriageway
0.30
0.50
0.20
1.60
Sidewalk
0.60
Main girder
2.80
2.80
Bearing
Cross girder
Figure 1.3 Section elevation and typical cross section of a bridge – The Lugela bridge in Mozambique, 2008. Superstructure (deck) and Substructure
(piers, abutments and foundations).
www.engreferencebooks.com
6
Bridge Design: Concepts and Analysis
●●
Another type of classification is often adopted, according to:
–– the predicted lifetime of the bridge, namely temporary (made in general in wood or
steel) or definitive bridges.
–– the fixity of the bridge, namely fixed or movable bridges, like lift bridges if the deck
may be raised vertically rolling bridges if the deck rolls longitudinally, or swing
bridges if the deck rotates around a vertical axis.
–– the in‐plan geometry of the bridge, like straight, skew or curved bridges.
1.4 Bridge Typology
Different bridge typologies, namely concerning the longitudinal structural system or
the deck cross section, may be adopted with different structural materials. The concept
design of a bridge is developed mainly in Chapters 4 and 5, but a brief description of the
variety of bridge options is presented here in order to introduce the topics of Chapters 2
and 3 concerning the basic data and conditions for design.
Nowadays, a beam bridge is the most usual type where the deck is a simple slab, a beam
and slab (Figure 1.3) or a box girder deck. Beam bridges may be adopted in reinforced
concrete for small spans (l), generally up to 20 m, or in prestressed concrete or in steel‐
concrete composite decks (Figure 1.4) for spans up to 200 m or even more. The superstructure may have a single span, simply supported at the abutments, or multiple
continuous spans (Figure 1.5). Between these two cases, some other bridge solutions are
possible like multiple span decks, in which most of the spans are continuous, but some
spans have internal hinges like in the so called ‘Gerber’ type beam bridges, shown in
Figure 1.6. However, the general trend nowadays is to adopt, as far as possible, fully continuous superstructures, to reduce maintenance of the expansion joints and to improve
the earthquake resistance of the bridge if located in a seismic region. Continuous decks
more than 2000 m long have been adopted for beam bridges, either for road or rail bridges.
Yet, in long continuous bridges, the distance between expansion joints is generally
restricted to 300–600 m to reduce displacements at the expansion joints. In a beam bridge,
the connection between the superstructure and the piers is made by bearings, as in
Figure 1.3, which allow the relative rotations between the deck and the piers; the relative
longitudinal displacements between the deck and the piers may or may not be restricted,
depending on the flexibility and slenderness of the piers, as discussed in Chapters 4 and 7.
If the deck is rigidly connected to the piers, one has a frame bridge (Figure 1.7). The
superstructure may be rigidly connected to some piers and standing in some bearings,
allowing rotations, or rotations and displacements, between the deck and some of
other piers.
In frame bridges, the piers are in most cases vertical. However, frame bridges with
slant legs, exemplified in Figure 1.8a, are a possible option. For a frame bridge with slant
legs or arch bridges, the main condition for adopting these typologies is the load bearing capacity of the slopes of the valley to accommodate, with very small displacements,
the horizontal component H (the thrust of the arch) of the force reactions induced by
the structure, as shown in Figure 1.8b.
An arch is likely to be a very efficient type of structure, an aesthetically pleasant solution for long spans in deep valleys, provided the geological conditions are appropriate.
The ideal shape of the arch, if the load transferred from the deck is considered as a
www.engreferencebooks.com
Introduction
Figure 1.4 Steel‐concrete composite plate girder decks: Approach viaducts three‐dimensional model
of the Sado River railway crossing, in Portugal (Figure 1.12).
uniformly distributed load q (valid for closed posts), is a second degree parabola because
the arch for the permanent load is free from bending moments. In this case, the arch is
only subjected to axial forces; that is, the arch follows the ‘pressure line’. It is easy to
show using simple static equilibrium (bending moment condition equal to zero at the
2
crown) that the thrust is given by H ql / 8 f .
Arch bridges may have different typologies and be made of different structural materials. In the old days, masonry arches made of stones were very often adopted for small
to medium span bridges. More recently, iron, steel and reinforced concrete bridges
replaced these solutions with spans going up to several hundred metres. One of the
www.engreferencebooks.com
7
8
Bridge Design: Concepts and Analysis
(a)
l
(b)
l1
l2
l3
l4
l5
Figure 1.5 Beam bridges – Elevation and longitudinal model: (a) single span and (b) multiple spans.
Expansion joint
Internal hinge
Figure 1.6 Beam bridge – Gerber type.
(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 1.7 Beam bridges – elevation view and longitudinal structural model: (a) single span, (b) and
(c) multiple spans.
www.engreferencebooks.com
Introduction
(a)
(b)
H
H
Figure 1.8 A frame bridge with inclined (slant) legs: (a) Reis Magos Bridge and (b) longitudinal
structural model.
most beautiful arch bridges is Arrábida Bridge, in Oporto (Figure 1.9), designed at the
end of the 1950s, the beginning of the 1960s and opened to traffic in 1963. The bridge,
at the time the longest reinforced concrete arch bridge in the world, has a span of 270 m
and a rise of 54 m ( f/l = 1/5).
The arch bridge may have the deck working from above or from below, as shown in
Figures 1.10 and 1.11. This last solution is adopted for traversing rivers at low levels
above the water, with particular restrictions for the vertical clearance h for navigation
channels. The horizontal component of the reaction at the base of the arch, at the connection between the arch and the deck, is taken by the deck. A bowstring arch bridge is
the designation for this bridge type, in which the deck has a tie effect, together with its
beam behaviour. Figure 1.12 shows a multiple bowstring arch bridge, with a continuous
deck composed of a single steel box section. The deck, with spans of 160 m, is a steel‐
concrete composite box girder to allow the required torsion resistance under eccentric
traffic loading. However, the classical solution for bowstring arches is made of a beam
and slab deck suspended from above by two vertical or inclined arches, as presented in
Chapter 6.
The main restriction nowadays for the construction of arches is the difficulty of the
execution method, when compared to a long span frame bridge with vertical piers, built
by the balanced cantilever method referred to in Chapter 4.
For spans above 150 m and up to 1000 m, cable‐stayed bridges, as previously shown in
Figure 1.2, are nowadays generally preferred to beam or frame bridges, for which the
www.engreferencebooks.com
9
10
Bridge Design: Concepts and Analysis
Figure 1.9 The Arrabida Bridge in Oporto, Portugal, 1963 (Source: Photograph by Joseolgon / https://
commons.wikimedia.org / Public Domain).
(a)
(b)
f (rise)
H
H
Spring line
l
(c)
crown
post
(d)
(e)
Figure 1.10 Arch bridges: (a) the classical parabolic two hinges arch bridge; (b) structural longitudinal
model; (c) independent arch and deck at the crown; (d) segmental arch and (e) low rise arch for a
pedestrian bridge without posts.
www.engreferencebooks.com