Tài liệu A spoonful of progress in a bowl full of unhealthy marketing to children docx

Jennifer L. Harris, Ph.D., M.B.A.
Marlene B. Schwartz, Ph.D.
Kelly D. Brownell, Ph.D.
A spoonful of progress
in a bowl full of unhealthy
marketing to children
BACKGROUND BETTER FOR KIDS
WORSE FOR KIDS
In 2009, the Rudd Center for Food
Policy & Obesity at Yale University issued
Cereal FACTS.
1
The report documented the
nutritional quality and marketing of cereals
to youth and found that cereal companies
aggressively marketed their worst products
to children as young as two years old.
Despite pledges to improve food advertising
to children through the Children’s Food and
Beverage Advertising Initiative (CFBAI),
2

the food industry’s self-regulatory program,
General Mills and Kellogg led in marketing of
unhealthy products targeted to children.
Since Cereal FACTS was rst published,
cereal companies have promised to do more,
including enhancing the nutritional prole of
cereals advertised to children and expanding
CFBAI advertising requirements.
2

But have
these changes improved the food marketing
environment that surrounds children?
Three years later—using the same
methods as the original Cereal FACTS—this
report quanties changes in cereal-company
marketing to children. We examined the
nutritional quality of 261 cereals from 12
companies in May 2012, including children’s
cereals (products marketed directly to
children), family cereals (marketed to
parents to serve their children), and adult
cereals (marketed to adults for their own
consumption). We also used syndicated
market research data and independent
analyses to quantify young people’s exposure
to marketing on TV and the internet.
Advertised cereals with the
poorest nutrition ratings:
1. Pebbles
2. Reese’s Puffs
3. Cinnamon Toast Crunch
4. Lucky Charms
5. Trix
6. Froot Loops
7. Apple Jacks
8. Cocoa Puffs
9. Honey Nut Cheerios
10. Cookie Crisp
Cereals most frequently

advertised to children:
1. Cinnamon Toast Crunch
2. Lucky Charms
3. Honey Nut Cheerios
4. Froot Loops
5. Reese's Puffs
6. Trix
7. Frosted Flakes
8. Pebbles
9. Cocoa Puffs
10. Cookie Crisp
From 2008 to 2011, cereal companies improved the nutritional quality of most
cereals marketed directly to children and reduced advertising for some products.
■
Overall nutritional quality improved for 13 of 16 child-targeted brands by 10%
on average. Of the 22 different child-targeted cereals available in 2008 and 2011, 10
(45%) reduced the sodium, 7 (32%) reduced sugar, and 5 (23%) increased ber.
General Mills improved the nutritional quality of all of its child-targeted cereals.
■
Millsberry.com and Postopia.com—the two most popular children’s advergame
sites—were discontinued, as were the Cap’n Crunch and Envirokidz child-
targeted websites. Due to the elimination of Millsberry.com, General Mills
decreased banner advertising on children’s websites by 43%.
■
Preschoolers’ exposure to TV ads for all cereals declined by 6%, and their
exposure to ads for child-targeted cereals decreased by 8%.
■
Among children ages 6-11, TV ad exposure declined for seven child-targeted
cereals. Notably, ads for Kellogg’s Apple Jacks and Corn Pops went down by
two-thirds, and ads for General Mills’ Cookie Crisp declined by 16%. Post stopped

advertising Honeycomb on TV.
From 2008 to 2011, cereal companies increased advertising to children for many of
their least nutritious products.
■
Total media spending to promote child-targeted cereals increased by 34%—
from $197 million in 2008 to $264 million in 2011. General Mills, Kellogg, and Post
ran campaigns to promote the nutritional quality of children’s cereals—their least
nutritious products—to parents.
■
Children’s exposure to TV ads increased for seven child-targeted cereals—
including Kellogg’s Froot Loops (+79%); General Mills’ Reese’s Puffs (+55%) and
Trix (+29%); and Post’s Pebbles (+25%).
■
Post and General Mills launched new advergame websites—PebblesPlay.com,
HoneyDefender.com (Honey Nut Cheerios), and CrazySquares.com (Cinnamon
Toast Crunch).
■
In 2011, the number of child visitors increased for eight of 10 child-targeted
websites that existed in 2008. On average in 2011, 162,000 children visited Kellogg’s
FrootLoops.com and 116,000 children visited AppleJacks.com every month.
■
Kellogg nearly doubled banner advertising on children’s websites for its child-
targeted brands. General Mills increased banner advertising for four brands,
including Honey Nut Cheerios (+185%), Lucky Charms (+58%), and Cinnamon
Toast Crunch (which was not advertised in 2008-2009). Banner advertising for
Post’s Pebbles doubled.
■
Kellogg introduced the rst food company child-targeted advergame app for
mobile phones and tablets: Apple Jacks “Race to the Bowl Rally.”
■

Despite an overall decline in TV ads for child-targeted cereals, black children's
total exposure to TV ads for child-targeted brands increased by 7.5%—
with the biggest increases for Kellogg’s Froot Loops (+88%) and General Mills’
Reese’s Puffs (+72%).
■
Cereal company spending on Spanish-language TV more than doubled—
from $26 million to $65 million. Hispanic preschoolers, on average, saw 90
Spanish-language TV ads for cereals in 2011 (in addition to ads on English TV).
Kellogg and General Mills launched new Spanish-language TV campaigns to
promote Froot Loops and Cinnamon Toast Crunch.
■
Kellogg introduced Krave cereal in 2012. Although the CFBAI does not list
Krave as a product that may be in child-directed advertising,
3
children ages 6 to
11 have seen more TV ads for Krave than any other age group.
MORE OF THE SAME
REFERENCES
RECOMMENDATIONS
Cereal companies continue to aggressively market their least
nutritious products directly to children.
■
Despite improvements, the cereals advertised to children
contain 57% more sugar, 52% less ber, and 50% more
sodium compared with adult-targeted cereals.
■
Companies do offer more nutritious and lower-sugar cereals
for children—but they are marketed to parents, not children.
❑ One-quarter of family cereals (27%)—including 11 varieties of
Kellogg's Frosted Mini-Wheats and General Mills' Multigrain

Cheerios—and nearly half of adult cereals (49%) met
recommended standards set by U.S. government agencies,
4

but they were not advertised to children.
■
Children still see more ads on TV for ready-to-eat cereals than
any other category of packaged food or beverage.
❑ In 2011, the average 6- to 11-year-old saw more than 700 TV ads
for cereals (1.9 per day), and the average 2- to 5-year-old saw 595
ads (1.6 per day)—General Mills, Kellogg, and Post continued to
advertise to preschoolers, despite pledges that they would not.
❑ Almost one-half (45%) of these ads promoted ve brands—
General Mills’ Cinnamon Toast Crunch, Honey Nut Cheerios,
Lucky Charms, and Reese’s Puffs; and Kellogg’s Froot Loops.
■
The majority of cereal ads that children see on TV promote
products consisting of one-third or more sugar—one
30-gram serving contains as much sugar as a 30-gram serving
of Chips Ahoy cookies (three cookies).
❑ Nearly 90% of cereal ads that children see promote products with
a sugar content higher than 26%. In comparison, approximately
one-half of ads seen by adults contain this level of sugar.
Advertising spending* Average nutrient content
# of Change Sugar Fiber Sodium
brands 2011 vs. 2008 (g per serving) (g per serving) (mg per 100g)
General Mills 8 $142 million +27% 33% (9.3 g) 6% (1.6 g) 555 mg
Kellogg 5 $108 million +47% 32% (9.5 g) 6% (1.6 g) 475 mg
Post 2 $14 million +17% 34% (10.0 g) 2% (0.6 g) 558 mg
*Source: Nielsen

Child-targeted cereals
Children's annual exposure to cereal ads on TV*
TV ads viewed per year
2008 2011 2008 2011
Children (6-11 years)Preschoolers (2-5 years)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
29
119
567
52
92
559
24
101
510
80
44
471
■ Adult brands and company ads
■ Family brands
■ Child brands
Sugar content of cereals in TV ads viewed

Children (2-11 years) Adults (18-49 years)
Sugar content
■ <20%
■ 20-26%
■ 27-33%
■ >33%
5%
7%
53%
35%
35%
21%
17%
27%
1. Harris JL, Schwartz MB, Brownell KD, et al. (2009). Cereal FACTS:
Evaluating the nutrition quality and marketing of children’s cereals.
Available at www.cerealfacts.org.
2. Kolish ED, Hernandez M, Blanchard K (2011). The Children’s Food &
Beverage Advertising Initiative in action. Available at www.bbb.org/us/
childrens-food-and-beverage-advertising-initiative/.
3. Children’s Food & Beverage Advertising Initiative (April 2012). Food
and beverage products that meet participants’ approved nutrition
standards that may be in child-directed advertising. Available at www.
bbb.org/us/childrens-food-and-beverage-advertising-initiative/.
4. Interagency Working Group on Food Marketed to Children (2011).
Preliminary proposed nutrition principles to guide industry self-regulatory
efforts. Available at www.ftc.gov/os/2011/04/110428foodmarketproposed
guide.pdf
Cereal companies have expressed a commitment to be part of
the solution to childhood obesity. However, they cannot do so

by making incremental improvements in the nutrition content
of children’s cereals—products that still contain one spoonful
of sugar for every three spoons of cereal—and continue to
aggressively market these products (their least nutritious cereals)
to children as young as two years old.
If General Mills, Kellogg, and Post truly want to help parents
raise healthy children, they must:
■
Signicantly reduce the hundreds of advertisements for high-
sugar cereals that children see every year; and
■
Use their substantial resources and creativity to nd ways to
encourage children to consume the healthful products in their
portfolios.
We urge them to do the right thing for children’s health.
Nutrition Top-10 in child-targeted
score* marketing on:
Third-party
Target Advergame youth
2012 2009 Brand** Company market TV websites websites
31 38
Cap’n Crunch Quaker Family
33 40
Pebbles Post Child X X X
38 34
Reese’s Puffs General Mills Child X X X
40 38
Smorz Kellogg Family
40 48
Honeycomb Post Child

41 37
Cinnamon Toast Crunch General Mills Child X X
42 36
Lucky Charms General Mills Child X X X
42 36
Golden Grahams General Mills Family
42 38
Trix General Mills Child X X X
43 39
Froot Loops Kellogg Child X X X
44 40
Apple Jacks Kellogg Child X X
44 44
Waffle Crisp Post Family
44 46
Alpha Bits Post Family
45 39
Cocoa Puffs General Mills Child X
46 44
Honey Nut Cheerios General Mills Child X X X
46 46
Golden Crisp Post Family
47 38
Cookie Crisp General Mills Child X
47 45
Frosted Flakes Kellogg Child X X X
47 41
Rice and Cocoa Krispies Kellogg Child X X
48 46
Honey Smacks Kellogg Family

48 46
Cheerios (except regular
and Honey Nut) General Mills Family
49 45
Chex General Mills Family
50 33
Corn Pops Kellogg Child X
50 44
Honey Nut O’s Cascadian Farm Family
50 48
Raisin Bran Post Family
50 50
Cinnamon Crunch Cascadian Farm Family
50 new
Fruitful O's Cascadian Farm Family
50 50
Shredded Oats -
Cinnamon Crunch Barbara’s Bakery Family
51 52
Envirokidz Organic Nature’s Path Family
52 50
Dora the Explorer General Mills Child
52 54
Clifford Crunch Cascadian Farm Child
53 50
Bunnies Annie’s Family
53 53
Life Quaker Family
54 51
Kix General Mills Family

54 new
Chocolate O's Cascadian Farm Family
55 56
Kashi Squares Kashi Family
56 58
Puffins Puffs Barbara’s Bakery Family
58 46
Purely O’s Cascadian Farm Family
58 52
Puffins Barbara’s Bakery Family
58 new
Life Crunchtime Quaker Family
59 58
Average nutrition score for adult-targeted cereals
70 58
Cheerios (regular) General Mills Family
72 new
Golden Goodness Kashi Family
73 71
Mini-Wheats Kellogg Family
Best
Nutrition rankings of children’s cereals
Worst
* The nutrition score is based on the nutrient profiling system developed by Rayner and colleagues at Oxford University and used by the Food Standards
Agency in the United Kingdom as the basis for determining which products can be advertised to children on TV.
Scores range from 0 - 100. A score of 62 or higher is defined as a healthy product.
**Bold indicates brands with child-targeted advertising on TV in 2011.
RANKINGS
Support for this project was provided by grants from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the Rudd Foundation.