Tài liệu Báo cáo khoa học: Dimers of light-harvesting complex 2 from Rhodobacter sphaeroides characterized in reconstituted 2D crystals with atomic force microscopy docx

Dimers of light-harvesting complex 2 from
Rhodobacter sphaeroides characterized in reconstituted
2D crystals with atomic force microscopy
Lu-Ning Liu
1,2
, Thijs J. Aartsma
1
and Raoul N. Frese
1
1 Huygens Laboratory, Department of Biophysics, Leiden University, The Netherlands
2 State Key Lab of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, Jinan, China
Photosynthetic bacteria use a large part of their internal
volume for functionalized invaginations of the intracyto-
plasmic membrane containing the photosynthetic
machinery. The most abundant protein complexes in
the intracytoplasmic membrane are light-harvesting
(LH) complexes, responsible for the absorption of sun-
light and subsequent excited state energy transfer, and
reaction centers (RCs), to which the energy is directed
to initiate the primary charge transfer reactions [1,2].
There are various photosynthetic purple bacterial spe-
cies that display high similarity between the molecular
structures of the individual photosynthetic protein
complexes [3–9]. Nevertheless, differences exist: purple
bacteria assemble a variety of photosynthetic unit
architectures, the simplest being an array of RC–LH
complex 1 (LH1) core complexes, as seen in Blasto-
chloris viridis and Rhodospirillum rubrum [10], whereas
other species, e.g. Rhodobacter sphaeroides, synthesize
Keywords
2D crystallization; atomic force microscopy;

light-harvesting complex 2; polymorphism;
Rhodobacter sphaeroides
Correspondence
R. N. Frese, Huygens Laboratory,
Biophysics Department, Leiden University,
2333CA Leiden, The Netherlands
Fax: +31 (0)71 527 5936
Tel: +31 (0)71 527 5970
E-mail:
(Received 26 February 2008, revised 28
March 2008, accepted 16 April 2008)
doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06469.x
Microscopic and light spectroscopic investigations on the supramolecular
architecture of bacterial photosynthetic membranes have revealed the pho-
tosynthetic protein complexes to be arranged in a densely packed energy-
transducing network. Protein packing may play a determining role in the
formation of functional photosynthetic domains and membrane curvature.
To further investigate in detail the packing effects of like-protein photosyn-
thetic complexes, we report an atomic force microscopy investigation on
artificially created 2D crystals of the peripheral photosynthetic light-har-
vesting complexes 2 (LH2’s) from the bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides.
Instead of the usually observed one or two different crystallization lattices
for one specific preparation protocol, we find seven different packing lat-
tices. The most abundant crystal types all show a tilting of LH2. Most sur-
prisingly, although LH2 is a monomeric protein complex in vivo, we find
an LH2 dimer packing motif. We further characterize two different dimer
configurations: in type 1, the LH2’s are tilted inwards, and in type 2, they
are titlted outwards. Closer inspection of the lattices surrounding the LH2
dimers indicates their close resemblance to those LH2’s that constitute a
lattice of zig-zagging LH2’s. In addition, analyses of the tilt of the LH2’s

within the zig-zag lattice and that observed within the dimers corroborate
their similar packing motifs. The type 2 dimer configuration exhibits a tilt
that, in the absence of up-down packing, could bend the lipid bilayer,
leading to the strong curvature of the LH2 domains as observed in
Rhodobacter sphaeroides photosynthetic membranes in vivo.
Abbreviations
AFM, atomic force microscopy; DDM, dodecyl-b-
D-maltoside; DMPC, dimyristoyl phosphatidylcholine; DOPC, dioleoyl phosphatidylcholine;
DOTM, dodecyl-b-
D-thiomaltoside; DPPC, dipalmitoyl-phosphatidylcholine; LDAO, N,N-dimethyldodecylamine-N-oxide; LH, light-harvesting;
LH1, light-harvesting complex 1; LH2, light-harvesting complex 2; LPR, lipid ⁄ protein ratio; OG, octyl-b-glucopyranoside; OTG, n-octyl-b-
D-
thioglucopyranoside; PC, phosphatidylcholine; RC, reaction center.
FEBS Journal 275 (2008) 3157–3166 ª 2008 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2008 FEBS 3157
peripheral LH complexes, LH complexes 2 (LH2’s), or
configure RC–LH1 complexes into dimeric supercom-
plexes [11]. Moreover, the structures of specific photo-
synthetic protein complexes may be variable. This is
exemplified by the 3D crystallographic structures of
LH2’s from the species Rhodopseudomonas acidophila
and Rhodospirillum molischianum [6,7]. Both species
synthesize LH2’s from repeating a-helical protein units
that are cylindrically arranged in a ring-like structure,
but Rhodop. acidophila complexes display nine-fold
symmetry and Rhodos. molischianum complexes display
eight-fold symmetry. Also, the exact arrangement of
the light-interacting chromophores within the protein
scaffold differs between these species. Finally, the
shape of the photosynthetic membranes is highly spe-
cies-dependent: B. viridis membranes are large, flat

sheets, Rhodos. molischianum membranes are stacked
thylakoids, and Rhodob. sphaeroides membranes con-
tain bud-like chromatophores [12].
The photosynthetic bacterium Rhodob. sphaeroides is
one of the few purple bacterial species that is amenable
to genetic manipulation, which facilitates a study of the
interdependence of membrane organization, membrane
shape, protein structure and protein composition. Dif-
ferent types of LH antenna complexes and RCs from
Rhodob. sphaeroides have been structurally analyzed by
X-ray crystallography, cryoelectron microscopy, and
atomic force microscopy (AFM) [3,13–16]. Recent
advances in AFM imaging and polarized spectroscopy,
utilizing these structural models, has revealed the
molecular architecture of native Rhodob. sphaeroides
membranes [17,18]. In all cases, images revealed close
proximity of the photosynthetic components, which
thus comprise a densely packed energy-transferring net-
work. Polarized light-spectroscopic measurements on
intact membranes revealed remarkable homology in
supramolecular organization in Rhodob. sphaeroides
membranes [19]. Monte Carlo simulations, assessing
the effect of the differences in size and shape of the
protein complexes, showed the importance of protein-
packing effects on the formation of like-protein
domains, membrane curvature, and the creation of dif-
fusive pathways within crowded membranes [18].
Packing effects of like proteins can be most clearly
observed in artificially created 2D crystals [20]. Such
crystals are formed from detergent-solubilized proteins

mixed with lipids by gradually removing the detergent.
There are essentially two main methods for removing
the detergent for 2D crystallization: flow dialysis and
bio-beads. Other variables involve the types of lipids
or mixtures of lipids used and the lipid ⁄ protein ratio
(LPR). Two-dimensional crystals of the photosynthetic
bacterial LH2 have been extensively studied by means
of AFM [13,14,21–24]. Table 1 summarizes the method
used and the crystal lattices from different species
observed with AFM. It was found that the morphol-
ogy of the 2D crystals and the LH2 arrangement are
highly dependent on the crystallization conditions,
including the lipid, detergent scavenger, protein con-
centration, LPR, and species used. Creating 2D crys-
tals of LH2 by flow dialysis in the presence of dioleoyl
phosphatidylcholine (DOPC) as lipid has been shown
to produce highly structured tubular crystals, although
these may contain different packing lattices [13]. With
Table 1. Summary of AFM data from 2D crystals of LH2. DMPC, dimyristoyl phosphatidylcholine; OG, octyl-b-glucopyranoside; DPPC, dipal-
mitoyl-phosphatidylcholine; DDM, dodecyl-b-
D-maltoside; DOTM, dodecyl-b-D-thiomaltoside.
Species Lipid(s) Detergent Method Lattice type
Rubrivivax gelatinosus [21] Egg PC OTG Bio-beads Square
Rhodobacter sphaeroides [14] DOPC OTG Bio-beads Square 1 (90°)
Rhodopseudomonas acidophila [22] Egg PC LDAO Dialysis Disordered
Rhodobacter sphaeroides [13] DOPC OG Dialysis Square 1 (90°)
Zig-zag 2 (90°)
Disordered
Rhodopseudomonas acidophila [23] DMPC OTG Bio-beads Square 1 (90°)
Zig-zag 2 (90°)

Disordered
Rhodobacter sphaeroides [24] DOPC ⁄ DPPC OG ⁄ DDM ⁄ DOTM Rinse Disordered
Rhodobacter sphaeroides (current) Egg PC OTG Bio-beads Square 1 (90°)
Square 2 (60°)
Zig-zag 1 (120°)
Zig-zag 2 (90°)
Dimer type 1
Dimer type 2
Disordered
AFM study on LH2 2D crystal L N. Liu et al.
3158 FEBS Journal 275 (2008) 3157–3166 ª 2008 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2008 FEBS
the use of bio-beads and DOPC, the more common
membrane vesicles are obtained, which have been
reported to contain only one type of packing motif
[14]. Chami et al. [25] found that n-octyl- b-d-
thioglucopyranoside (OTG) can greatly increase the
crystal size. Detergent removal using bio-beads can be
achieved at a much higher rate than with dialysis [26].
On the basis of AFM imaging of both the periplasmic
and cytoplasmic sides of LH2’s after reconstitution,
ellipticity and tilt of the LH2’s have been reported
[14,21,23]. A comparison between the different packing
configurations found in 2D crystals of LH2’s from
Rhodop. acidophila showed for one specific LPR a
square-packing lattice consisting of LH2’s that were
tilted relative to the lipid-membrane plane, and for
another LPR a lattice of zig-zagging nontilted LH2’s
[23]. In that study, it was concluded that the observed
tilt of LH2’s within the square lattice was not due to
an intrinsic property of LH2’s of Rhodop. acidophila,

but was caused by specific interactions induced by
packing. In contrast, tilted LH2’s and RC–LH1’s have
been observed in native membranes of Rhodob.
sphaeroides [17]. Moreover, in the aforementioned
model of the photosynthetic membrane of this particu-
lar species, we showed the importance of protein pack-
ing for the full appearance of the membrane [18].
More specifically, we showed that the formation of
LH2 domains has a strong influence on the curvature
of the membrane. In the absence of a 3D crystallo-
graphic structure, we assigned an intrinsic curvature to
the LH2 of Rhodob. sphaeroides that could originate
from a slight conical shape or specific binding of a
curved lipid. In any case, a tilted configuration in
packed conditions could ultimately lead to membrane
curvature.
Here we further investigate in detail the packing
effects in artificially created 2D crystals of the LH2
from Rhodob. sphaeroides . Our results show that with
egg phosphatidylcholine (PC) as lipid and bio-beads as
detergent scavenger, a multitude of different packing
configurations can be obtained within one preparation.
AFM images allow the differences in protein packing
and interaction within the membrane to be visualized.
Within the packed lattices, we find a new conforma-
tion of LH2’s, namely a dimeric configuration.
Detailed investigations of the observed LH2 packing
patterns reveal that the different packing lattices con-
sist of similarly interacting LH2’s. The dimeric LH2
configuration is very likely to exist as an intermediate

packing configuration. Furthermore, we find that
LH-2, in all cases, show a tilted conformation. One of
the two types of LH2 dimer configurations is shown to
possess a tilt that could bend the lipid bilayer, leading
to the bud-like membrane curvature as observed for
Rhodob. sphaeroides in vivo. Finally, on the basis of
these images, schematic models of possible LH2
arrangements and protein–protein contacts in the
reconstituted 2D crystal membranes are proposed.
Results
Two-dimensional crystals of Rhodob. sphaeroides
LH-2s were prepared according to the protocol of
Rigaud et al. [26], involving the addition of OTG for
LH2 solubilization and detergent removal by
bio-beads. This method has been applied successfully
for the 2D crystallization of LH2’s from a range of
photosynthetic bacterial species, as shown in Table 1.
In contrast to other studies, here we utilized egg PC
(Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) as lipid in combination
with Rhodob. sphaeroides LH2’s. A range of prepara-
tions were examined with different LPRs (0.35, 0.4,
0.45, 0.5, 0.55, 0.6). All preparations were shown to
form large vesicles as determined by electron
microscopy (data not shown). For the AFM imaging,
all samples were prepared with LPR = 0.5. Our
imaging method has been described before [13,17]. In
essence, ultrasoft tapping-mode AFM was applied in
combination with the choice of appropriate buffer for
electrostatic balancing of the AFM tip and the
substrate. Electrostatically balanced tapping-mode

AFM was shown to produce the highest-resolution
images of naturally curved membranes [17], and
was applied here to obtain detailed information on
possible tilts of the protein complexes above the
membranes.
Figure 1 shows typical 2D crystals of densely packed
LH2’s as observed with AFM. The protruding mass
appears most bright; the mica surface is dark. Even at
this low magnification, the LH2’s were visible as rings,
about 7 nm wide. Crystals had a diameter of up to 2 lm
and a height of 6.5 ± 1.0 nm (n = 20). Areas of empty
lipid bilayer without incorporated LH2’s had an average
height of 4.0 ± 0.7 nm (n = 20). Already at the low
magnification of Fig. 1, the regular arrangement of
LH2’s and the varieties thereof could be observed. It is
noteworthy that several different LH2 arrangements
could coexist in the same membrane fragment. We
found no less than seven different packing arrangements
in terms of the different lateral arrangements and tilts
of LH2’s. There were two rectangular arrays, two
zig-zag lattices, two types of dimeric organization, and
a disordered arrangement. The majority of crystalline
lattices were occupied by so-called ‘zig-zag’ rows of
LH2’s ( 80%). The other 20% contained crystallized
arrangements of LH2’s in a square pattern and with a
L N. Liu et al. AFM study on LH2 2D crystal
FEBS Journal 275 (2008) 3157–3166 ª 2008 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2008 FEBS 3159
disordered distribution. Most surprisingly, a dimeric
LH2 configuration could be observed, as shown in
Fig. 1 (areas 4 and 6). Regardless of the protein-packing

arrangement, the LH-2s were clearly resolved in all these
types of periodicities, with outer and inner diameters of
6.5 ± 0.5 nm and 3.2 ± 0.3 nm (n = 50), respectively,
in agreement with previous descriptions [7,13,14,21].
High-resolution AFM topographs showing the ‘zig-
zag’ lattices in close detail are shown in Fig. 2. Differ-
ent angles between adjacent strongly protruding LH2
rings, approximately 120° (Fig. 2A) and 90° (Fig. 2B),
indicated two types of zig-zag lattice. The inset of
Fig. 2A shows a high-magnification image of LH2
rings embedded in the 2D crystals. Within this zig-zag
lattice, we were able to visualize the weakly protruding
LH2’s. These lower LH2’s had an average height of
 4.5 A
˚
(n = 20) above the lipid bilayer, whereas the
strongly protruding LH2’s had an average height of
 9.9 A
˚
(n = 30). On the basis of the spacing between
LH2 rows measured in this work and previous estima-
tions [27], the arrangements of up-LH2’s and down-
LH2’s in the zig-zag lattices are schematically
illustrated as green and turquoise circles.
Twenty per cent of crystal lattices in the preparation
were found to occupy the square arrangement of
LH-2s, as shown in Fig. 3. We recorded two different
square lattices with a variation of angles between the
progressing lines of protruding LH2’s: approximately
90° (Fig. 3A) and 60° (Fig. 3B). The former pattern

has been well described earlier in Rhodob. sphaeroides
[14], whereas the latter array is observed for the first
time. The 60° square lattice consists of four strongly
protruding LH2’s arranged in rhombic periodicity. The
spacing within this domain could fit for two weakly
protruding LH2’s, which could be occasionally recog-
nized (Fig. 3B, arrows). These down-LH2’s could form
a hexagonal motif surrounding a central up-LH-2.
These available results enabled the arrangements of
up-LH2’s and down-LH2’s in these lattices to be sche-
matically depicted in Fig. 3.
We also found a novel arrangement of LH2 crystal
packing, termed a dimer lattice. Figure 4 shows high-
magnification images of the areas containing dimers;
the larger lattice of origin is indicated in Fig. 1
(area 4). LH2’s were found to be aligned, forming
rows along the long axis of the dimers within a period-
ical lattice. Figure 4A shows an area where two LH2’s
contact closely, separated from neighboring LH2–LH2
dimers. Adjacent rows of dimers are separated such
that the dimeric LH2 in the neighboring row faces the
empty central space. The distance between adjacent
rows of dimers was found to be 5.3 ± 0.4 nm
(n = 20), less than the size of the LH2. Figure 4B,C
presents two different dimer lattices (type 1 and type 2)
with opposing lines of progress. The directions of the
progressing lines were related to that of the surround-
ing zig-zag lattices. This will be discussed below. The
inset of Fig. 4A shows a scheme of the packing config-
uration of dimers. Such a specific arrangement is

exemplified in the inset of Fig. 4B, in which the up
and down configuration of LH2’s can be viewed. Here,
the less protruding LH2’s are visualized, showing their
location to be precisely within the gap between two
adjacent dimers.
Discussion
Dimeric LH2
Surprisingly, we observed dimeric configurations of
LH-2. Native membranes from four different LH2-
containing photosynthetic bacteria, including Rhodob.
sphaeroides, have been imaged by AFM before [17,28–
32]. In all cases, no sign of LH2 dimers has been
reported, although LH1–RC complexes are mainly
arranged in rows of dimers in Rhodob. sphaeroides.An
AB C
Fig. 1. Overview of typical crystals imaged with AFM (raw images). Areas of different crystal lattices are indicated by dashed lines. (A) Two
types of zig-zag (areas 1 and 2), disordered (area 3) and dimer (area 4) lattices. (B) Zig-zag lattice (area 2), square lattice (area 5) and dimers
(area 6). (C) Zig-zag lattice (area 1) and dimers (area 6). Scale bars: (A) 100 nm; (B) 50 nm; (C) 200 nm.
AFM study on LH2 2D crystal L N. Liu et al.
3160 FEBS Journal 275 (2008) 3157–3166 ª 2008 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2008 FEBS
important clue about the origin of the dimers can be
found upon close inspection of the crystal lattices. LH2
dimers are always surrounded by zig-zag lattices
(Fig. 4). With respect to these surrounding zig-zag
lattices, we found two different dimer morphologies
(Fig. 5A,B). When we represented a zig-zag line as
progressing Vs (or VVVV), where the corners of the
V are occupied by LH2’s, we found dimers progressing
along both sides of the V. For instance, in Fig. 4B, the
V-shaped zig-zag lines appear to correlate with dimers

progressing along the \-side of the V (or zig-side),
whereas in Fig. 4C, the dimers progress along the
⁄ -side of the V (or zag-side). It thus seems that the
LH-2s associated with either the zig-side or the zag-side
of zig-zag lines actually originate from LH2 dimers.
More evidence for the dimeric origin of zig-zag
lattices can be obtained from high-resolution AFM
images of dimers and zig-zag LH2’s, as shown in
Fig. 5. In dimeric LH2’s, there were two tilted types
found with different protruding heights, type 1 dimers
(Fig. 5A) and type 2 dimers (Fig. 5B). Type 1 dimers
have high contacting sides and low peripheral sides
(Fig. 4A), whereas type 2 dimers show an opposite tilt-
ing orientation. The tilt of LH2 dimers was further
studied by measuring the protruding profiles of each
LH2 within the dimer on the basis of the height
differences of both sides and the size of LH2’s
(Fig. 5C,D). This allowed the tilting angles to be calcu-
lated as 5.0 ± 0.5° and 3.5 ± 0.3° (n = 20), respec-
tively. These two tilting angles bear a striking
resemblance to that of the zig and zag LH2’s as shown
in Fig. 5F,G. Depending on the directions along which
LH2’s were measured, we found the same angles as for
A
B
Fig. 2. Raw AFM images of the two different zig-zag lattice types.
(A) Zig-zag lattice (type 1) with 120° angle: zoomed-in image of the
areas indicated by the dashed line in Fig. 1A (area 1). Inset: 3D
enhanced close view showing weakly protruding LH2’s (black
arrows) in between the strongly protruding zig-zag lines (white

arrows). (B) Zig-zag lattice (type 2) with 90° angle: zoomed-in image
of the area indicated by the dashed line in Fig. 1B (area 2). Strongly
and weakly protruding LH2’s are schematically illustrated as green
and turquoise circles, respectively. Scale bars: (A) 10 nm;
(B) 20 nm.
A
B
Fig. 3. Raw AFM images of the two types of square-packing lat-
tices observed. Strongly and weakly protruding LH2’s are schemati-
cally illustrated as green and turquoise circles, respectively. (A)
Square lattice (type 1) with 90° angle. Note that the schematic
arrangement of LH2’s is according to earlier descriptions [14,27].
(B) Square lattice (type 2) with 60° angle (see text). Arrows indicate
weakly protruding complexes. The rhombic domain formed by
up-LH2’s and the potential hexagonal motif of down-LH2’s are
shown. Scale bars: (A) 30 nm; (B) 20 nm.
L N. Liu et al. AFM study on LH2 2D crystal
FEBS Journal 275 (2008) 3157–3166 ª 2008 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2008 FEBS 3161
the two dimer types. In the absence of up-down pack-
ing, such as in native membranes, the observed tilt
could bend the lipid bilayer. Remarkably, the direction
and degree of tilt of the type 2 dimer were consistent
with the parameters that were used in modeling the
packing-induced membrane curvature of native Rhod-
ob. sphaeroides membrane buds [18].
To conclude, we found that the dimers within the
two dimer lattices tilt similarly to the zig-zag LH2’s.
Furthermore, the alignment of the dimers along their
long axis coincides with their zig or zag LH2 counter-
parts within the surrounding zig-zag lattices. These

two observations strongly suggest that the zig-zag
lattice is composed of LH2 dimers.
Why LH2 is dimerized within this particular prepa-
ration, whereas it is absent in native membranes, is
unknown. The presence of dimers in these crystals may
reflect a more dense packing condition. In mutant
Rhodob. sphaeroides membranes where RC–LH1
dimerization was inhibited, we also observed a particu-
lar RC–LH1 dimer effect [18]. There, we found the
RC–LH1 monomers to be rotationally locked within
one unique orientation in half of the cases. Rotational
locking had been observed before, but only for
RC–LH1 dimers, and not for monomers [33]. We
could relate this effect to an increased packing strain
within the mutant membranes induced by dense pack-
ing. As the protein helices constituting LH2 and LH1
are similar, the dimerization that we observed here
might just reflect another packing effect acting on
these similar LH proteins.
Packing lattices
By means of AFM, we observed a multitude of differ-
ent packing arrangements within one 2D crystal prepa-
ration. In Table 1, we summarize our findings and
those of previous published studies. Within the five
separate AFM studies on 2D crystals of LH2’s
published to date (two of which were on Rhodob.
sphaeroides LH2), only one type of square (square 1
with 90° angle) and one type of zig-zag lattice
(zig-zag 2 with 90° angle) have been reported. Here we
find two types of square lattices, two types of zig-zag

lattices and two dimer lattices, including the commonly
found disordered ‘lattice’; no less than seven different
packing configurations for LH2 (see Table 1). In any
AFM study, a certain amount of selectivity cannot be
avoided, as only those areas that reveal a protruding
mass can be discussed. In this respect, possible rear-
rangements due to the adhesion to the mica surface
represent an intrinsic variability that is largely beyond
the control of an experimenter. Nevertheless, unlike
other studies on Rhodob. sphaeroides LH2, this study
combined egg PC as lipid and bio-beads as detergent
scavenger. Egg PC is a mixture of very similar lipids
containing all different fatty acid side-chains. In
contrast, the commonly used DOPC contains only one
type of lipid. Here we speculate that the differences
between the lipids in egg PC, although small, may
induce different LH2–LH2 interactions. This effect
may be further enhanced by the use of bio-beads,
instead of the dialysis method, which does not
uniformly remove detergent throughout a preparation.
On the other hand, 2D crystals of LH2’s from
Rubrivivax gelatinosus have been prepared using
bio-beads and egg PC as well, and there only one type
of crystal lattice was found [21]. The differences and
variations in packing lattices might therefore possibly
originate from the structural differences between the
LH2’s from different species. Similarly, it has been
documented that the LPR is a critical factor in
packing LH2 from Rhodop. acidophila in either a
square or a zig-zag lattice [23]. Our observation that

different patterns of LH2 packing coexist within the
same crystal preparation suggests that this is not the
case for the Rhodob. sphaeroides LH2.
On the basis of the observations shown in Figs 1–4,
we represent five schematic models of LH2 arrange-
ments in either up or down (and in one case unknown)
configuration, without considering the tilt of LH2 in
Fig. 6. The strongly protruding LH2’s, or up-LH2’s,
protrude about 1.0 nm, in good agreement with the
previous data obtained on Rhodob. sphaeroides
and Ru. gelatinosus 2D crystals [13,14,21]. In the latter
AB
C
Fig. 4. High-resolution AFM images of the dimer areas surrounded
by zig-zag lattices. Images are 3D-enhanced for clarity. (A) Zoomed-
in image of Fig. 1A (area 4). Inset: closer view of dimeric LH2’s.
Strongly and weakly protruding LH2’s are schematically illustrated
as green and turquoise circles, respectively. (B) Type 1 dimer con-
figurations. Inset: zoomed-in images show strongly and weakly (indi-
cated by white arrows) protruding LH2’s. ‘Dimer’ and ‘zig-zag’ LH2
lattices are indicated by white lines. (C) Type 2 dimer configurations.
‘Dimer’ and ‘zig-zag’ LH2 lattices are again indicated by white lines.
Note the opposing lines of progress as compared to type 1. See
text for details. Scale bars: (A) 30 nm; (B) 50 nm; (C) 30 nm.
AFM study on LH2 2D crystal L N. Liu et al.
3162 FEBS Journal 275 (2008) 3157–3166 ª 2008 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2008 FEBS
study, it was shown that the strongly protruding side
was the periplasmic side of the complex by means of
thermolysin digestion that only affected this face [21].
Also in Rhodob. sphaeroides native membranes, which

preferentially showed their periplasmic face up, similar
heights of LH2 protrusions above the membrane were
measured [13,14]. We thus conclude that the strongly
protruding LH2’s expose their periplasmic face. Here,
we occasionally visualized configurations of lower-lying
LH2’s. We found that these protruded 4.5 A
˚
above the
membrane, in good agreement with the earlier reports
of the protrusions of the down-LH2’s from Rhodob.
sphaeroides, which represents the cytoplasmic face
[13,14].
In contrast to the previously reported arrangements
(Fig. 6A,D), we visualized a new square lattice
(Fig. 6B), a new zig-zag lattice (Fig. 6C), and a novel
organization, a dimer lattice (Fig. 6E). Actually, we
observed zig-zag lines in  80% of the lattices, indicat-
ing that there is a strong preference for LH2’s to
constitute the zig-zag lines. The 90° lines of zig-zagging
up-LH2’s and down-LH2’s (Fig. 6D) have been
characterized before for both Rhodob. sphaeroides and
Rhodop. acidophila [13,14,23]. The 120° zig-zag lattice
could represent a more dense packing motif accom-
plished by a translation of alternating rows of LH2’s
(Fig. 6C). On the other hand, this lattice could also
represent a hexagonal lattice of all up-LH2’s, with
alternating lines of zig-zagging LH2’s significantly
lowered due to adhesion to the mica surface. Such a
lattice has been reported before to exist in LH2-only
Rhodob. sphaeroides membranes, which contains all

A
B
E
6.3
9.8
10.0
7.9
6.2
6.1
7.6
8.5
10.6
6.7
10.0
11.0
6.4
8.8
6.4
C
D
F
G
Fig. 5. Comparison between two types of dimer configuration (A, B) and the zig-zag lattice (E). (A) LH2 dimer type 1 isolated from the image
shown in Fig. 4B. (B) LH2 dimer type 2 originating from Fig. 4C. (C, D) The two distinct height profiles of LH2 dimers, indicating the tilt
(n = 20). (E) Zig-zag LH2 lattice isolated from Fig. 2B. (F, G) The height profiles of zig-zag LH2 with respect to two vertical directions
(n = 20), indicated as E1 (\) and E2 ( ⁄ ), respectively in (E) (height in A
˚
). Scale bars: (A, B) 5 nm; (E) 10 nm.
L N. Liu et al. AFM study on LH2 2D crystal
FEBS Journal 275 (2008) 3157–3166 ª 2008 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2008 FEBS 3163

up-LH2’s [27]. In that case, the significant lowering
of alternating rows of LH2 implies the existence of
specific interactions between the LH2’s constituting a
zig-zag row. This study provides further evidence for
this, as we found similar interactions between the
LH2’s within the zig-zag lattices and those within
the LH2 dimer configuration. In addition, we observed
non-zig-zagging LH2’s within two different square-
packing lattices (Fig. 6A,B). As seen in Fig. 6F, as
compared to the zig-zag, 90° square-packing lattices
represent a less packed configuration, indicating that
dense packing may induce the specific interactions
leading to zig-zagging LH2’s. The intermediate density
of the dimer lattice, on the other hand, indicates that
the dimer organization might be a transient configura-
tion between 90° square lattice and others.
Tilting of LH2
Our images also allow us to characterize in detail the
heights and tilts of the LH2’s for all different crystal
lattices. In contrast to the many differences regarding
packing lattices and configurations discussed in the
previous section, we found all LH2’s to be tilted on the
periplasmic side similarly in all lattices. Similar tilts have
been observed for Rhodob. sphaeroides LH2 before,
packed within a square lattice [14]. In contrast, Gonc¸ al-
ves et al. [23] reported that no tilt of LH2 from
Rhodop. acidophila was observed in type 2 crystals
(zig-zag), but a 4° tilt was observed in type 1 crystals
(square). The similar tilts of Rhodob. sphaeroides LH2 in
all lattices indicate that the packing density and the

induced interactions among neighboring LH2’s are the
predominant factors that drive the arrangements of
LH2. In addition, it has been observed that tilting of
LH2’s shows some dependency upon the packing den-
sities of different lattices. The least packed, disordered
organization presents the smallest tilt 1.3 ± 0.2°
(n = 20), whereas the largest tilt, 6.5 ± 0.5° (n = 20),
is observed in the zig-zag lattice, which also represents
the most densely packed configuration.
In conclusion, crystalline packing in a high number
of configurations of LH2’s in 2D crystals has been
resolved by AFM. We characterized no less than seven
different LH2 lattices in only one specific preparation.
All individual LH2’s of Rhodob. sphaeroides are tilted,
depending upon the packing densities of LH2’s in the
crystal lattices. We found a novel dimeric organization
of LH2, and showed the close resemblance to the
LH2’s that form the zig-zag lattice. Such a lattice has
also been observed in LH2-only domains of adhered
Rhodob. sphaeroides membrane patches [27], which in
native conditions are spherically shaped [34]. One type
of the dimers observed here displays a tilt capable of
curving the membrane in such a manner, leading to
the spherical domains as observed in intact LH2-con-
taining Rhodob. sphaeroides membranes [17,18,34].
Although long-range curvature is strongly reduced in
2D crystals, the similarity in configuration of this
dimer and that of the LH2 complexes forming the
11.4
10.8

12.8 7.0
6.0
12.9 7.0
7.0
7.15.3
10.9
Strongly protruding LH2 (up) Weakly protruding LH2 (down)
12.0
15.0
22 000
F
A
B
C
D
E
20 000
21 000
18 367
ABCDE
21 208 21 224
20 408
19 047
19 000
18 000
LH2 density (µm
–2
)
Fig. 6. Schematic models for the different
lattice types of LH2 observed by AFM with

measured distances in nanometers and
angles (n = 20). (A, B) Square-packing
lattices corresponding to the images from
Fig. 3A,B. (C, D) Zig-zag lattices correspond-
ing to Fig. 2A,B. (E) The dimer lattices from
Fig. 4 (note: packing configurations for both
lattices in Fig. 4 are the same). (F) Total
LH-2 densities of the different lattices.
AFM study on LH2 2D crystal L N. Liu et al.
3164 FEBS Journal 275 (2008) 3157–3166 ª 2008 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2008 FEBS
curved domains in native Rhodob. sphaeroides mem-
branes indicates the existence of specific, packing-
induced interactions between LH2 and the lipid mem-
brane of this species in vivo.
Experimental procedures
LH2 purification
After 4 days of growth, Rhodob. sphaeroides wild-type cells
were harvested and disrupted by sonication. Unbroken
cells and cell debris were removed by centrifugation
(10 000 g for 20 min). The supernatant containing
chromatophores was pelleted by centrifugation at
265 000 g for 90 min at 4 °C, and then resuspended in
10 mm Tris buffer (pH 7.5) to A
850 nm
= 200Æcm
)1
. Mem-
branes were solubilized with 1% (w ⁄ v) N,N-dimethyldode-
cylamine-N-oxide (LDAO) (Fluka, Buchs, Switzerland) for
40 min. Insoluble material was removed by centrifugation

for 10 min at 10 000 g. The supernatant was then
incubated in 10 mm Tris buffer and 0.5% Triton, and
centrifuged for 5 min at 10 000 g. The pellet was resus-
pended in 10 mm Tris buffer (pH 7.5) and incubated with
1% LDAO for 20 min at room temperature. LH2’s were
purified using a discontinuous sucrose density gradient
of 1.2 m and 0.6 m sucrose in 10 mm Tris buffer, and
centrifuged for 2 h at 300 000 g.
Two-dimensional crystallization
Purified LH2’s (20 mgÆmL
)1
) were mixed with a lipid buffer
composed of 2.5 mgÆmL
)1
egg PC (Sigma) and 20 m m
OTG (Sigma) [26] to a final LPR of 0.5 (w ⁄ w). Detergent
removal was performed through three additions of 5 mg
of SM2 Bio-Beads (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) [35,36].
After 2.5 h of stirring at room temperature, the reconsti-
tuted material was stored at 4 °C for AFM analysis.
AFM
The AFM sample of LH2 crystals was prepared by adsorbing
2 lL of sample solution onto the surface of freshly cleaved
mica covered with absorption buffer (10 mm Tris ⁄ HCl,
pH 7.5, 150 mm KCl, 25 mm MgCl
2
) for 60 min, and then
carefully rinsing with recording buffer (10 mm Tris ⁄ HCl,
pH 7.5, 150 mm KCl) in order to remove weakly bound crys-
tal patches. Imaging was performed with a commercial AFM

instrument (NanoscopeIII; Digital Instruments, Santa Bar-
bara, CA, USA) and standard silicon nitride cantilevers with
a length of 85 lm, a force constant of 0.5 NÆm
)1
and operat-
ing frequencies of 25–35 kHz (in liquid) (Veeco NanoProbe
Tips, Santa Barbara, CA, USA) were used. High-resolution
AFM images were obtained using tapping mode in liquid
and with amplitude setpoint adjusted to minimal forces.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Dre
´
de Wit for growing the Rhodob.
sphaeroides cells and purifying the LH2. This research
was sponsored by the Dutch Science Foundation
[Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research
(NWO)]. This project is part of the research
programme ‘From Molecule to Cell’, funded by the
NWO and the Foundation for Earth and Life Sciences
(ALW). R. N. Frese gratefully acknowledges the
NWO for a veni-grant. Lu-Ning Liu acknowledges
financial support from a PhD Study-Abroad Scholar-
ship of Shandong University (China).
References
1 Cogdell RJ, Gall A & Ko
¨
hler J (2006) The architecture
and function of the light-harvesting apparatus of purple
bacteria: from single molecules to in vivo membranes.
Q Rev Biophys 39, 227–324.

2 Fleming GR & van Grondelle R (1997) Femtosecond
spectroscopy of photosynthetic light-harvesting systems.
Curr Opin Struct Biol 7, 738–748.
3 Allen JP, Feher G, Yeates TO, Komiya H & Rees DC
(1987) Structure of the reaction center from Rhodobact-
er sphaeroides R-26: the protein subunits. Proc Natl
Acad Sci USA 84, 6162–6166.
4 Cogdell RJ, Fyfe PK, Barrett SJ, Prince SM, Freer AA,
Isaacs NW, McGlynn P & Hunter CN (1996) The purple
bacterial photosynthetic unit. Photosynth Res 48, 55–63.
5 Deisenhofer J, Epp O, Miki K, Huber R & Michel H
(1985) Structure of the protein subunits in the photo-
synthetic reaction centre of Rhodopseudomonas viridis at
3A
˚
resolution. Nature 318, 618–624.
6 Koepke J, Hu X, Muenke C, Schulten K & Michel H
(1996) The crystal structure of the light-harvesting com-
plex II (B800–850) from Rhodospirillum molischianum.
Structure 4, 581–597.
7 McDermott G, Prince SM, Freer AA, Hawthornthwa-
ite-Lawless AM, Papiz MZ, Cogdell RJ & Isaacs NW
(1995) Crystal structure of an integral membrane light-
harvesting complex from photosynthetic bacteria.
Nature 374, 517–521.
8 McLuskey K, Prince SM, Cogdell RJ & Isaacs NW
(2001) The crystallographic structure of the B800–820
LH3 light-harvesting complex from the purple bacteria
Rhodopseudomonas acidophila strain 7050. Biochemistry
40, 8783–8789.

9 Roszak AW, Howard TD, Southall J, Gardiner AT,
Law CJ, Isaacs NW & Cogdell RJ (2003) Crystal struc-
ture of the RC–LH1 core complex from Rhodopseudo-
monas palustris. Science 302, 1969–1972.
10 Miller KR (1982) Three-dimensional structure of a
photosynthetic membrane. Nature 300, 53–55.
L N. Liu et al. AFM study on LH2 2D crystal
FEBS Journal 275 (2008) 3157–3166 ª 2008 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2008 FEBS 3165
11 Jungas C, Ranck J-L, Rigaud J-L, Joliot P & Verme
´
glio
A (1999) Supramolecular organization of the photosyn-
thetic apparatus of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. EMBO J
18, 534–542.
12 Drews G & Imhoff JF (1991) Phototrophic purple bac-
teria. In Variations in Autotrophic Life (Shively JM &
Barton LL, eds), pp. 51–97. Academic Press, London.
13 Bahatyrova S, Frese RN, van der Werf KO, Otto C,
Hunter CN & Olsen JD (2004) Flexibility and size hetero-
geneity of the LH1 light harvesting complex revealed by
atomic force microscopy: functional significance for
bacterial photosynthesis. J Biol Chem 279, 21327–21333.
14 Scheuring S, Seguin J, Marco S, Le
´
vy D, Breyton C,
Robert B & Rigaud J-L (2003) AFM characterization
of tilt and intrinsic flexibility of Rhodobacter sphaeroides
light harvesting complex 2 (LH2). J Mol Biol 325,
569–580.
15 Scheuring S, Francia F, Busselez J, Melandri BA,

Rigaud J-L & Le
´
vy D (2004) Structural role of PufX in
the dimerization of the photosynthetic core complex of
Rhodobacter sphaeroides. J Biol Chem 279, 3620–3626.
16 Walz T, Jamieson SJ, Bowers CM, Bullough PA &
Hunter CN (1998) Projection structures of three photo-
synthetic complexes from Rhodobacter sphaeroides: LH2
at 6 A
˚
, LH1 and RC–LH1 at 25 A
˚
. J Mol Biol 282,
833–845.
17 Bahatyrova S, Frese RN, Siebert CA, Olsen JD, van der
Werf KO, van Grondelle R, Niederman RA, Bullough
PA, Otto C & Hunter CN (2004) The native architecture
of a photosynthetic membrane. Nature 430, 1058–1062.
18 Frese RN, Pa
`
mies JC, Olsen JD, Bahatyrova S, van der
Weij-de Wit CD, Aartsma TJ, Otto C, Hunter CN,
Frenkel D & van Grondelle R (2008) Protein shape and
crowding drive domain formation and curvature in
biological membranes. Biophys J 94, 640–647.
19 Frese RN, Siebert CA, Niederman RA, Hunter CN,
Otto C & van Grondelle R (2004) The long-range
organization of a native photosynthetic membrane.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101, 17994–17999.
20 Stahlberg H, Fotiadis D, Scheuring S, Re

´
migy H,
Braun T, Mitsuoka K, Fujiyoshi Y & Engel A (2001)
Two-dimensional crystals: a powerful approach to
assess structure, function and dynamics of membrane
proteins. FEBS Lett 504, 166–172.
21 Scheuring S, Reiss-Husson F, Engel A, Rigaud J-L &
Ranck J-L (2001) High-resolution AFM topographs of
Rubrivivax gelatinosus light-harvesting complex LH2.
EMBO J 20, 3029–3035.
22 Stamouli A, Kafi S, Klein DC, Oosterkamp TH,
Frenken JW, Cogdell RJ & Aartsma TJ (2003) The
ring structure and organization of light harvesting 2
complexes in a reconstituted lipid bilayer, resolved by
atomic force microscopy. Biophys J 84, 2483–2491.
23 Gonc¸ alves RP, Busselez J, Le
´
vy D, Seguin J & Scheur-
ing S (2005) Membrane insertion of Rhodopseudomonas
acidophila light harvesting complex 2 investigated by
high resolution AFM. J Struct Biol 149
, 79–86.
24 Milhiet P-E, Gubellini F, Berquand A, Dosset P, Ri-
gaud J-L, Le Grimellec C & Le
´
vy D (2006) High-resolu-
tion AFM of membrane proteins directly incorporated
at high density in planar lipid bilayer. Biophys J 91,
3268–3275.
25 Chami M, Pehau-Arnaudet G, Lambert O, Ranck J-L,

Le
´
vy D & Rigaud J-L (2001) Use of octyl beta-thiog-
lucopyranoside in two-dimensional crystallization of
membrane proteins. J Struct Biol 133, 64–74.
26 Rigaud J-L, Chami M, Lambert O, Le
´
vy D & Ranck
J-L (2000) Use of detergents in two-dimensional
crystallization of membrane proteins. Biochim Biophys
Acta 1508, 112–128.
27 Bahatyrova S (2005) Atomic force microscopy of
bacterial photosynthetic systems: a new model for native
membrane organization. PhD Thesis, University of
Twente, Enschede.
28 Gonc¸ alves RP, Bernadac A, Sturgis JN & Scheuring S
(2005) Architecture of the native photosynthetic appara-
tus of Phaeospirillum molischianum. J Struct Biol 152,
221–228.
29 Scheuring S, Busselez J & Le
´
vy D (2005) Structure of
the dimeric PufX-containing core complex of
Rhodobacter blasticus by in situ atomic force
microscopy. J Biol Chem 280, 1426–1431.
30 Scheuring S, Gonc¸ alves RP, Prima V & Sturgis JN
(2006) The photosynthetic apparatus of Rhodopseudo-
monas palustris: structures and organization. J Mol Biol
358, 83–96.
31 Scheuring S, Rigaud J-L & Sturgis JN (2004) Variable

LH2 stoichiometry and core clustering in native mem-
branes of Rhodospirillum photometricum. EMBO J 23,
4127–4133.
32 Scheuring S & Sturgis JN (2005) Chromatic adaptation
of photosynthetic membranes. Science 309, 484–487.
33 Frese RN, Olsen JD, Branvall R, Westerhuis WH,
Hunter CN & van Grondelle R (2000) The long-range
supraorganization of the bacterial photosynthetic unit:
a key role for PufX. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97,
5197–5202.
34 Hunter CN, Pennoyer JD, Sturgis JN, Farrelly D &
Niederman RA (1988) Oligomerization states and
associations of light-harvesting pigment–protein
complexes of Rhodobacter sphaeroides as analyzed
by lithium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis. Biochemistry 27, 3459–3467.
35 Rigaud J-L, Le
´
vy D, Mosser G & Lambert O (1998)
Detergent removal by non-polar polystyrene beads.
Eur Biophys J 27, 305–319.
36 Rigaud J-L, Mosser G, Lacapere J-J, Olofsson A, Le
´
vy
D & Ranck J-L (1997) Bio-beads: an efficient strategy
for two-dimensional crystallization of membrane
proteins. J Struct Biol 118, 226–235.
AFM study on LH2 2D crystal L N. Liu et al.
3166 FEBS Journal 275 (2008) 3157–3166 ª 2008 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2008 FEBS