Tải bản đầy đủ (.pdf) (666 trang)

RESEARCH HANDBOOK ON THE FUTURE OF EU COPYRIGHT potx

Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (7.18 MB, 666 trang )

RESEARCH HANDBOOK ON THE FUTURE OF
EU COPYRIGHT
RESEARCH HANDBOOKS IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Series Editor: Jeremy Phillips, Intellectual Property Consultant, Olswang,
Research Director, Intellectual Property Institute and co-founder, IP Kat weblog
Under the general editorship and direction of Jeremy Phillips comes this
important new Handbook series of high quality, original reference works that
cover the broad pillars of intellectual property law: trademark law, patent law
and copyright law – as well as less developed areas, such as geographical indi-
cations, and the increasing intersection of intellectual property with other
fields. Taking an international and comparative approach, these Handbooks,
each edited by leading scholars in the respective field, will comprise specially
commissioned contributions from a select cast of authors, bringing together
renowned figures with up-and-coming younger authors. Each will offer a
wide-ranging examination of current issues in intellectual property that is unri-
valled in its blend of critical, innovative thinking and substantive analysis, and
in its synthesis of contemporary research.
Each Handbook will stand alone as an invaluable source of reference for all
scholars of intellectual property, as well as for practising lawyers who wish to
engage with the discussion of ideas within the field. Whether used as an infor-
mation resource on key topics, or as a platform for advanced study, these
Handbooks will become definitive scholarly reference works in intellectual
property law.
Titles in the series include:
Copyright Law
A Handbook of Contemporary Research
Edited by Paul Torremans
Trademark Law and Theory
A Handbook of Contemporary Research
Edited by Graeme Dinwoodie and Mark D. Janis


Patent Law and Theory
A Handbook of Contemporary Research
Edited by Toshiko Takenaka
Research Handbook on the Future of EU Copyright
Edited by Estelle Derclaye
Research Handbook on the
Future of EU Copyright
Edited by
Estelle Derclaye
Associate Professor and Reader in Intellectual Property Law,
University of Nottingham, UK
RESEARCH HANDBOOKS IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Edward Elgar
Cheltenham, UK • Northampton, MA, USA

© The Editor and Contributors Severally 2009
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a
retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical or
photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher.
Published by
Edward Elgar Publishing Limited
The Lypiatts
15 Lansdown Road
Cheltenham
Glos GL50 2JA
UK
Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.
William Pratt House
9 Dewey Court
Northampton

Massachusetts 01060
USA
A catalogue record for this book
is available from the British Library
Library of Congress Control Number: 2008937416
ISBN 978 1 84720 392 2
Typeset by Cambrian Typesetters, Camberley, Surrey
Printed and bound in Great Britain by MPG Books Ltd, Bodmin, Cornwall
Contents
List of contributors vii
Table of cases ix
Introduction 1
Estelle Derclaye
1
Copyright without frontiers: the problem of territoriality in
European copyright law 12
P. Bernt Hugenholtz
2 Copyright’s fundamental rights dimension at EU level 27
Christophe Geiger
3 Subject matter 49
Tanya Aplin
4 The subject-matter for film protection in Europe 77
Pascal Kamina
5 The requirement of originality 102
Ramón Casas Vallés
6 From idea to fixation: a view of protected works 133
Antoine Latreille
7 Duration of copyright 148
Yves Gaubiac, Brigitte Lindner and John N. Adams
8 Authorship, ownership, wikiship: copyright in the 21st century 193

Jeremy Phillips
9 Economic rights 212
Ansgar Ohly
10 Moral rights 242
Willem Grosheide
11 The moral right of integrity 267
Jacques de Werra
12 Dealing with rights in copyright-protected works: assignments
and licences 286
Andreas Rahmatian
13 The issue of exceptions: reshaping the keys to the gates in the
territory of literary, musical and artistic creation 317
Marie-Christine Janssens
14 Private copy levies and technical protection of copyright:
the uneasy accommodation of two conflicting logics 349
Séverine Dusollier and Caroline Ker
v
15 Collective management of copyright and related rights:
achievements and problems of institutional efforts towards
harmonisation 373
Maria Mercedes Frabboni
16 Copyright protection of computer programs 401
Jon Bing
17 The protection of databases 427
Matthias Leistner
18 Choice of law in EU copyright directives 457
Paul Torremans
19 Overlap/relationships between copyright and other intellectual
property rights 480
Antoon Quaedvlieg

20 Relationship between copyright and contract law 517
Lucie Guibault
21 European competition law and copyright: where do we stand?
Where do we go? 543
Valérie Laure Benabou
22 Do whiffs of misappropriation and standards for slavish
imitation weaken the foundations of IP law? 567
Anselm Kamperman Sanders
23 Access to knowledge under the international copyright regime,
the WIPO development agenda and the European Communities’
new external trade and IP policy 575
Henning Grosse Ruse-Khan
By way of conclusion: what next? 614
Estelle Derclaye
Index 625
vi Research handbook on the future of EU copyright
Contributors
John N. Adams, Professor Emeritus University of Sheffield, Adjunct
Professor University of Notre Dame, Barrister at Law
Tanya Aplin, Reader in Intellectual Property Law, King’s College London
Valérie Laure Benabou, Director of the DANTE Laboratory, Professor,
University of Versailles
Jon Bing, Professor, Norwegian Research Centre for Computers and Law,
University of Oslo
Ramón Casas Vallés, Professor of Private Law, University of Barcelona
Jacques de Werra, Professor of Intellectual Property Law and of Contract
Law and Co-Director of the Art Law Centre, University of Geneva
Séverine Dusollier, Professor, University of Namur
Maria Mercedes Frabboni, Queen Mary, University of London
Yves Gaubiac, Attorney, Kimbrough & Associés, Lecturer, University

Pantheon-Assas, Paris 2, University of Evry Val d’Essonne, General Secretary
of International Literary and Artistic Association (ALAI), Editor in Chief of
the Revue Internationale du Droit d’Auteur (RIDA)
Christophe Geiger, Associate Professor, Director of the Centre for
International Industrial Property Studies (CEIPI), the University of Strasbourg
Willem Grosheide, Professor of Intellectual Property Law, Molengraaf
Institute for Private Law/Centre for Intellectual Property Law (CIER),
University of Utrecht
Henning Grosse Ruse-Khan, Senior Research Fellow, Max Planck Institute
for Intellectual Property, Competition and Tax Law, Munich
Lucie Guibault, Senior Researcher, Institute for Information Law (IViR),
University of Amsterdam
vii
P. Bernt Hugenholtz, Professor of Intellectual Property Law, University of
Amsterdam, and Director, Institute for Information Law (IViR)
Marie-Christine Janssens, Professor of Intellectual Property Law, Catholic
University of Leuven
Pascal Kamina, Associate Professor (Maître de conférences), University of
Poitiers, Attorney, Paris Bar
Anselm Kamperman Sanders, Professor of Intellectual Property Law,
Maastricht University, Academic Director of the IEEM Intellectual Property
Law School, Macau
Caroline Ker, Assistant and Researcher, Centre of Research in Computer and
IT Law (CRID), University of Namur
Antoine Latreille, Professor, Université Paris-Sud 11, Co-director of the
research centre CERDI and of the Master DI2C
Matthias Leistner, Professor of Civil Intellectual Property Law and
Competition Law and Director of the Institute for Commercial Law,
University of Bonn
Brigitte Lindner, Rechtsanwältin, Registered European Lawyer, Serle Court,

London
Ansgar Ohly, Professor of Private Law and Intellectual Property Law, the
University of Bayreuth
Jeremy Phillips, Intellectual Property Consultant, Olswang; Editor, Journal
of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (OUP); Professorial Fellow, Queen
Mary Intellectual Property Research Institute; co-blogmeister, The IPKat
weblog (www.ipkat.com)
Antoon Quaedvlieg, Professor of Law, University of Nijmegen
Andreas Rahmatian, Lecturer in Law, University of Leicester
Paul Torremans, Professor of Intellectual Property Law, School of Law,
University of Nottingham, Professor of Private International Law, Faculty of
Law, University of Ghent
viii Research handbook on the future of EU copyright
Table of cases
ix
European Court of Justice
Advocaten voor de Wereld Case C-
303/05 [2007] ECR I-03633 28
Arsenal Football Club plc v Matthew
Reed Case C-206/01 OJ [2002]
C323/22 571
Basset v SACEM Case C-402/85
[1987] 3 CMLR 173 312
Benetton/G-Star Case C-371/06 20
Sep 2007 510
BHB v Hill Case C-203/02 [2004]
ECR I-10415 430, 432, 434,
435, 436, 437–46, 448, 450, 451,
454, 455
Booker Aquaculture Ltd, Hydro

Seafood GSP Ltd and the
Scottish Ministers Joined Cases
C-20 & 64/00 ECR [2003]
I-7411 31
Bristol Myers Squibb v Paranova
11 July 1996 [1996] ECR
I-3457 491
British Horseracing Board and
Others v William Hill
Organisation Ltd Case C-203/02
[2005] ECDR 1, Media en
Informatierecht 2005, 36–7 129,
202, 550, 570
Bronner v Mediaprint Case C-7/97
[1998] ECR I-00791 447
BRT/SABAM (BRT II) Case 127/73
ECJ [1973] 313 546, 559
Canon Case C-39/97 [1998] ECR
I-5507 491
Carosello v Butterfly Case C-60/98,
GRUR Int 1999, 868 16
Coditel I Case 62/79 [1980] ECR
881 20, 21
Coditel II Case 262/81 [1982] ECR
3381 24, 548
Commission v Ireland Case
C-175/05 [2007] ECR I-3 224
Commission v Italy Case C-198/05
[2006] ECR I-107 224
Commission v Portugal Case

C-53/05 [2006] ECR I-6215 224
Commission v Portugal Case C-
61/05 [2006] ECR I-6779 224
Commission v Spain Case C-36/05
[2006] ECR I-10313 224
Deutsche Grammophon v Metro Case
78/70 [1971] ECR 487 1, 20,
545, 547, 614
Dior v Evora see Parfums Christian
Dior/Evora
Egeda v Hoasa Case C-293/98
[2000] ECR I-629 227
Egmont et al v Laserdisken Case
C-61/97 [1998] ECR I-5271 224
EMI-Electrola GmbH v Patricia Im-
und Export Verwaltungs -
gesellschaft mbH et al Case
341/87 ECR [1989] 79 18, 222
Fixtures Marketing Ltd v
Organismos prognostikon agonon
podosfairou AE (OPAP) Case
C-444/02, Grand Chamber 9 Nov
2004 60, 61, 62, 129, 202, 432,
436, 550
Fixtures Marketing Ltd v Oy
Veikkaus Ab Case C-46/02 129,
202, 432, 436, 550
Fixtures Marketing v Svenska Spel
AB Case C-338/02 129, 202,
432, 436, 550

GVL v Commission Case 7/82 ECR
[1983] 483 24, 379
HAG II Case C-10/89 491
Hauer Case 44/79 31
Henkel Case C-128/01 12 Feb 2004
511
Hoffmann-La Roche/Centrafarm
Case 102/77 491
IMS Health v NDC Health Case C-
418/01 [2004] ECR I-00791 447,
448, 450, 455, 545, 553, 554, 556,
558, 562, 563, 564, 565, 566, 573,
618
Lagardère Active Broadcast v
Société pour la Perception de la
rémunération équitable (SPRE)
and Others Case C-192/04 14
July 2005 18, 227
Laserdisken v Kulturministeriet
Case C-479/04 [2006] ECR
I-8089 222
Linde, Winward, Rado 8 Apr 2003
ECR I-3161 511
Loendersloot/Ballantine Case
C-349/95 491
Lucazeau (François) and others v
Société des Auteurs,
Compositeurs et Editeurs de
Musique (SACEM) and others
Joined Cases 110, 241 & 242/88

[1989] ECR 2811 381
Mag Instrument, re Case C-136/02P
ECR I-9165 511
Magill case see Radio Telefis
Eireann and others v Commission
and Magill TV Guide
Mediakabel v Commissariat voor de
Media Case C-89/04 [2005] ECR
I-4891 227
Miller International Schallplatten
GmbH v EC Commission Case
19/77 [1978] 2 CMLR 334 312
Ministère Public v Tournier Case
395/87 [1989] ECR 2521 380
Musik-Vertrieb Membran v GEMA
Joined Cases C-55 & 57/80
[1981] ECR 147 222
Nokia v Wärdell Case C-316/05 279
Nold Case 4/73 [1974] ECR 491 31,
38
OPAP case see Fixtures Market Ltd
v Organismos prognostikon
agonon podosfairou AE (OPAP)
Oscar Bronner Case C-7/97 562
Parfums Christian Dior/Evora Case
C-337/95 8, 488, 489, 490, 515
Parliament v Council Case C-540/03
[2006] ECR I-05769 28
Patricia case see EMI-Electrola
GmbH v Patricia Im- und Export

Verwaltungs-gesellschaft mbH
et al
Peek & Cloppenburg KG v Cassina
SpA Case C-456/06, 17 Apr
2008 221
Phil Collins v Imtrat Joined Cases
C-92 & 326/92 [1993] ECR
I-5145 230, 257–8, 270
Philips/Remington Case C-299/99
[2002] ECR I-5475 491, 496,
497, 500, 501, 503, 511
Promusicae v Telefonica de
Espana Case C-275/06 29 Jan
2008 333
Radio Telefis Eireann and others v
Commission and Magill TV
Guide (Magill) Case C-241 &
242/91 P [1995] ECR I-743 43,
129, 311, 432, 447, 545, 552,
553, 554, 556, 561, 562, 563,
565, 573
x Research handbook on the future of EU copyright
Schawe v Sächsisches Druck- und
Verlagshaus Case C-215/07 OJ C
155 7 July 2007 452
SENA/NOS Case C-245/00 [2003]
All ER (D) 67, [2003] ECR
1251 333, 354, 622
SGAE v Rafael Hoteles SL Case C-
306/05 [2006] ECR I-11519 217,

227, 228, 333
Silhouette/Hartlauer Case C-355/96
[1998] ECR I-4799 222
Sirena/Eda 18 Feb 1971 547
Storck/OHIM Case C-25/05P 22
June 2006 512
Terrapin/Terranova Case 119/75
491
Tournier Case C-395/87 p 2521,
RIDA no 144, 51 551
Unibet Case C-432/05 [2007] ECR
I-02271 28
United Brands case 559
Volvo AB v Erik Veng (UK) Ltd
Case 238/87 [1988] ECR 6211,
[1989] 4 CMLR 122 547, 552,
573
Warner Bros v Christiansen Case
158/86 [1988] ECR 2605 222
Windsurfing Case 193/83 [1986] 3
CMLR 489 312
Case 260/89 39
Case C-368/95 39
Case C-60/00 39
Case 304/07 431, 439, 440
Court of First Instance
Micro Business Leader v Commission
Case T-198/98 545, 560
Microsoft v Commission Case
T-201/04 OJ C 269 10.11.2007

447, 450, 455, 554, 556, 563,
564, 573, 618
Tiercé Ladbroke SA v Commission
Case T-504/93 ECR [1997]
II-923 24, 558
Commission Decisions
Cannes Extension Agreement 4 Oct
2006 – COMP/C2/28.681 386
GEMA [1971] OJ L134/15, [1971]
CMLR D35 312, 379
IFPI Simulcasting 2003/300/EC 8
Oct 2002 OJ L107/62 24, 381
Santiago Agreement –
COMP/C2/38126 OJ C200/11 25
European Court of Human Rights
Anheuser Busch Inc v Portugal
Appln No 73049/01 29, 32
Müller & Ors v Switzerland 24 May
1988, Ser A No 133, 27 532
Oberschlick v Austria 23 May 1991,
Ser A No 204, 57 532
Smith Kline and French Laboratories
Ltd v The Netherlands Appln
No 12633/87, 66 DR 70, 79
(1990) 29, 32, 148
Sporring and Lönroth v Sweden A52
(1982) 148
WTO Appellate Body
India – Patent Protection for
Pharmaceutical and Agricultural

Chemical Products,
WT/DS50/AB/R, 17 Dec 1997
580
US – Countervailing Duties on
certain Corrosion-Resistant
Carbon Steel Flat Products from
Germany, WT/DS213/AB/R, 28
Nov 2002 580
US – Import Restrictions of Certain
Shrimp and Shrimp Products,
WT/DS58/AB/R 580, 589
Table of cases xi
US – Measures Affecting the
Cross Border Supply of
Gambling and Betting Services,
WT/DS285/AB/R, 7 Apr 2005
590
US – Standards for Reformulated
and Conventional Gasoline,
WT/DS2/AB/R, 29 Apr 1996
580, 589
WTO Dispute Settlement Body
IMRO case Doc WT/DS 160/R 322
WTO Panel Report
Canada – Patent Protection of
Pharmaceutical Products,
WT/DS114/R, 17 Mar 2000 579,
588
European Communities – Protection
of Trademarks and Geographical

Indications for Agricultural
Products and Foodstuffs,
WT/DS/179/R, 15 Mar 2005 588
US – Section 110(5) of US
Copyright Act, WT/DS160/R, 15
Jun 2000 588, 589
National cases
Australia
Computer Edge Pty Ltd v Apple
Computer Inc (1986) 161 CLR
171 51
Data Access Corporation v
Powerflex Services Pty Ltd
(1999) 202 CLR 1 67
Desktop Marketing Systems Pty Ltd
v Telstra Corporation Ltd [2002]
FCAFC 112 62
Austria
Buchstützen OGH ÖBl 1997,
38 307
Für Katalog und Folder OGH 21
Mar 2000, 4 Ob 77/00b 307
Gelbe Seiten 27 Nov 2001 [2001]
GRUR Int 940 431
Hotel Video 17 Jun 1986 [1986]
GRUR Int 728 473
Medienprofessor, OGH, 12 June
2001 [2002] 33 IIC 994 46
Schuldrucksorten OGH ÖBl 1995,
116 289

Schutz von Werbemitteln –
Dienstnehmerwerke OGH 19 Oct
2004, 4 Ob182/04z 294, 307
Case 4 Ob 19/91 28 May 1991
[1992] European Comm Cases
456, [1991] GRUR Int 920
465
Case 4 Ob 44/92 16 June 1992
[1994] European Comm Cases
526, [1994] IPRax 380 466
Oberlandesgericht Graz Judgment of
6 Dec 1990 [1991] GRUR Int
386 465
Oberlandesgericht Vienna
Judgments of 30 Nov 1989
[1990] GRUR Int 537 466
Oberlandesgericht Vienna
Judgments of 27 Jun 1991 [1991]
GRUR Int 925 466
Belgium
Google Inc v Copiepresse SCRL
[2007] ECDR 5 228
Supreme Ct 25 Sep 2003 [2004] A
& M 29 45
Benelux Court of Justice
Adidas Three Stripes 23 Dec 1985,
Case A 83/4 [1987] GRUR Int
707–11 508
xii Research handbook on the future of EU copyright
Superconfex/Burberry’s

(Burberry’s I) Case A 87/8
[1990] GRUR Int 863 508, 509
Burberry’s/Bossi (Burberry’s II) 16
Dec 1991, Case A90/4 [1992]
EIPR D-140 508
Canada
Canadian Admiral Corp Ltd v
Rediffusion Inc (1954) 20 CPR
75; 14 Fox Pat C 114 83
CCH Canadian Ltd v Law Society
of Upper Canada [2004] 1 SCR
39 112
Tele-Direct (Publications) Inc v
American Business Information
Inc 154 DLR (4th) 328 (1997) 62
Denmark
Danske Dagblades Forening
(DDF) v Newsbooster [2003]
ECDR 5 66
Finland
Adobe Systems Inc v [A] Software
Distribution [2004] ECDR (30)
303 424
France
Anne Bragance v Olivier Orban and
Michel de Grèce, CA Paris 1 Feb
(1989) 142 RIDA 301 276, 472,
478
Atari, Cass Ass plen 7 Mar 1986
[1986] JCP II, 20631 94, 485

Barthes, TGI Paris 20 Nov 1991
[1992] RIDA 340 141
Bruce Springsteen Autobiography,
Paris (4e Chambre) 28 Feb 2007
RIDA 212, Apr 2007 113
Bsiri-Barbir v Haarmann & Reimer
[2006] ECDR 28, Sup Ct 58,
68, 568
CNN, Cass 1re civ, 6 Apr 1994
[1994] RIDA 367 228
Coprosa, Cour de Cassation 2 May
1989 128
Corsica Muntagna, Cour de
Cassation (civ) 7 Nov 2006,
RIDA 211 113
de Lalande, TGI Nanterre, 19 Jan
2005, RIDA 207 115
Dimitri Busuioo Ionesco v Sté Metro
Goldwyn Mayer and Sté Romania
Films, TGI Paris 14 Feb 1977
(1978) 97 RDA 179 471, 472
Doyen v Parnaland, Trib of First
Instance of Seine, 10 Feb 1905;
Paris CA 10 Nov 1909 78
France Télécom c/ Lectiel et
Groupeadress Cass Com 4 Dec
2001, CE 29 Jul 2002 559
Huston (John) case (colorization)
TGI Paris 23 Nov 1988; CA
Paris 6 Jul 1989; Cour de

Cassation 28 May 1991, RIDA
1991 (149), 197 275, 277, 463,
464, 471, 472
Isermatic, Cour de Cassation 16
April 1991 121
L’Oréal v Parfums Eurolux, TGI
Paris 28 Nov 2007 142
L’Oréal SA v Bellure NV, TGI Paris
26 May 2004; [2006] ECDR 16,
CA Paris (4th Chamber) 58, 68,
142
La Recouvrance, Cour d’Appel
de Rennes, 7 Sep 2004 111,
127
La Totale, Cour de Cassation, 1st civ
ch 5 July 2006 136
Lacan, TGI Paris, 11 Dec 1985 141
Lancôme v SA Argeville Aix-en-
Provence, Ct of Appeal 13 Sep
2007 142
Table of cases xiii
Les Misérables – sequel, Cour de
Cassation 30 Jan 2007 280
Microfor, Cour de Cassation 9 Nov
1983 155
Mulholland Drive, Cour de
Cassation 28 Feb 2006, (4 ch
Chamb A) 4 Apr 2007 329,
353
Nejla Bsiri-Barbir/Soc Haarman et

Reimer, Cass civ 13 June 2006
[2006] GRUR Int 1039 484
P Duchier v D Geuroult, RG No
93/020429, Paris CA 4th
Chamber, discussed (1995) 166
RIDA 240 58
Pachot, Cour de Cass 7 Mar 1986
120
SA Beauté Prestige International v
Sté Senteur Mazal (2008) 39 IIC
113 58, 68
SA Galba Films v Friedman, Sarl
Capital Films, Pernot and
Société Les Fils La Boétie
(1975) 83 RIDA 106, on appeal
Léopold Friedman v SA Galba
Films (1976) 88 RIDA 115
469
SA Prline v SA Communication &
Sales and SAL News Investment
[2002] ECDR 2 66
Salvador Dali – Photographs, Paris
(4e Chambre) 27 Jan 2006, RIDA
210, Oct 2006 113
SARL La Rosa v Sté Almax
International SPA CA Paris
[1992] La Semaine Juridique
21780 474
SISRO, Cour de Cass 5 Mar 2002
[2002] 34 IIC 701 314

Soc Toho Cy Ltd v Soc Film d’art et
Soc Prodis, CA Paris (1961) 33
RIDA 112 474
Société Fox-Europa v Société Le
Chant du Monde (1960) 28 RIDA
120 459
Société Tigest Sarl v Societe Reed
Expositions France [2002] ECC
29 66
Union Fédérale des Consommateurs-
Que Choisir v Sony France and
Sony UK TGI Nanterre (6e
chambre) 15 Dec 2006 535
Utrillo, Paris District Ct (3rd
Chamber, 23 Feb 1999) 184 RIDA
374 (2000); Paris Ct of Appeals
(4th Chamber, 30 May 2001) 191
RIDA 294 (2002); Supreme Ct (1st
Civil Chamber, 13 Nov 2003)
[2004] 35 IIC 716 44, 45
Vincent v Cuc Software 94
Williams Electronics, Cass Ass plen
7 Mar 1986 [1986] JCP II,
20631 94
COUR DE CASSATION
1re Civ 1 Jul 1970 293
[1971] Revue Critique de Droit
International Privé 270 471
1re civ 13 Nov 1973 293
1 Mar 1988 127

1st civ ch 4 Feb 1992 136
30 Jun 1993 127
1st civ ch 30 June 1998 137
Crim 23 Nov 1999 124
28 Jan 2003 (no 00-20014) 94,
275
26 Nov 2003 558
Civ 3 Feb 2004 127
Ch comm 12 July 2005 558
1st civ ch 25 Nov 2005 137
Crim Div 30 May 2006 (no K 05-
83.335 F-D) 346
1st civ ch 13 Jun 2006 141
1st civ ch 16 Jun 2006 142
xiv Research handbook on the future of EU copyright
1st Civil Division, 30 Jan 2007, 38
IIC 736 (2007) 48
27 Feb 2007 152
COUR D’APPEL
Caen 6 Oct 2006 127
Lyon 1 Apr 2004 and Cour de
Cassation (Comm ch) 4 July
2006 135
Paris 13 Mar 1986 137
Paris 14 Mar 1991 [1992] La
Semaine Juridique 21780 471
Paris 17 Dec 2003 146, 147
Paris 26 Jan 2006 142
Paris 14 Feb 2007 142
Pau 18 Nov 1904 78

TGI Bobigny 28 Nov 2006 142
TGI Paris 21 Sep 1983 (1984) 120
RIDA 156 471
TGI Paris 26 May 1987 137
TGI Paris, 3e ch, 8 Sep 1998
(1999), RIDA, no 181, 318,
affirmed, Paris 4e ch, 28 Apr
2000, Com com électr. 2000,
comm no. 86 94
TGI Paris 2 Oct 2001 145
Toulouse District Ct 26 Sept 2001,
187 Légipresse 149 (2001),
reversed Toulouse Ct of Appeals,
3rd Chamber, 13 June 2002, 9
Propr. intell. 384 (2003) 44
Lourdes Trib of First Instance 28
July 1904 78
Paris Trib de Commerce 24 Sep
1999 142
Versailles 18 Nov 1999 94
Germany
Alf, 17 Jun 1992 [1993/94] IIC
539 302
Betriebssystem, 4 Oct 1990 (1991)
22 IIC 723 65, 120, 197
Beuys Fotografien OLG Düsseldorf
[1997] GRUR 49, 50 169
Buchhaltungsprogramm [Accounting
Program] 14 Jul 1993, [1994]
GRUR 39, (1993) CR 752,

(1995) 26 IIC 127 65, 123, 197,
408
EROC III, BGH 10 Oct 2002 [2002]
IIC 702 306
Folgerecht bei Auslandsbezug (Joseph
Beuys) BGH [1994] GRUR 798
(1995) 26 IIC 573 230
Gedichttitelliste II, 24 May 2007,
[2007] GRUR 688–90 431, 440,
441, 442
Holzhandelsprogramm, 20 Jan
1994 123
Inkasso-programm, 9 May 1985
[1985] GRUR 1041 (1986) 17
IIC 681 65, 120, 123, 197, 294,
408, 484
Jugendgefährdende Medien bei
eBay, BGH [2007] GRUR
890 235
Laras Tochter, BGH [1999] GRUR
984 (2000) IIC 1050 218
Le Corbusier-Möbel, BGH [2007]
GRUR 50 221
Lustige Witwe, BGH [1975] GRUR
495 161, 162
Michel-Nummern, 3 Nov 2005 I
ZR 311/02, [2006] GRUR 493
435
Microsoft OEM Licence, BGH
Decision 6 Jul 2000 – I ZR

244/97 539
Mikrokopien, BGH 24 Jun 1955
[1955] GRUR 546 350
OEM-Versionen, BGH [2001]
GRUR 153 223
Paperboy, BGH GRUR 2003, 958,
[2004] IIC 1097 228
Table of cases xv
Personalausweise, BGH 29 May
1964 [1965] GRUR, 104 350
Salome III, BGH [2000] GRUR 869,
870 161, 162
Schallplatten, Federal Constitutional
Ct BVerfGE 31, 275 167, 170,
171
Schawe v Sachsisches Druck- und
Verlagshaus, BGH 28 Sep 2006,
GRUR 2007, 500 (see also ECJ
case) 452
‘Show Format’, BGH (2004) 35 IIC
987 72, 73
Spiegel-CD Rom, BGH [2002]
GRUR 248 306
Stadtbahnfahrzeug, BGH [2002]
GRUR 799, 800 215
Thumbnails, OLG Hamburg 5 Sep
2003, [2004] GRUR-RR 313
(2004) 35 IIC 478 219
Tonträgersampling, OLG Hamburg
[1992] GRUR Int 390 215, 216

Verteileranlagen, BGH 8 Jul 1993,
[1994] GRUR 45 228
Visicorp v Basis Software GmbH
(1983) 14 IIC 437, District Ct,
Munich I 51
Wagenfeld-Leuchte, BGH 15 Feb
2007, [2007] GRUR 871 221
Wagner Familienfotos; Schricker-
Katzenberger OLG Hamburg
[1999] GRUR 717, 720 168
BGH Judgment of 17 Jun 1992
[1993] GRUR Int 257 467, 468
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT
12 May 1989, 1989 EuGRZ 339 40
Framework Decision 18 July 2005,
[2005] NJW 2289 40
29 June 2000, Germania 3, [2001]
GRUR 149 47–8
OLG Hamburg 1 Nov 2001 504
OLG Karlsruhe 1 Oct 1996, 6 U
40/95 424
LG Berlin 12 Dec 1960 Maifeiern
[1962/04] GRUR 207 533
LG Berlin 28 Nov 2006 [2007]
ZUM 424 267
LG Köln 8 May 2002 28 O 180/02,
[2002] MMR 689 432
LG München I [2007] MMR 328
237
BGHZ 27, 264 – Boxprogramme

170
BGHZ 37, 1 – AK1 170
Israel
Eisenmann v Quinrom (Dead Sea
Scrolls case) Sup Ct 30 Aug
2000 116
Netherlands
Algemeen Dagblad et al v Eureka
Internetdiesten, Rotterdam
Dist Ct 22 Aug 2000 [2002]
ECDR 1 228
Boycott Outspan Aksie Hof,
Amsterdam 30 Oct 1980, [1981]
NJ no 422 533
BREIN v Techno Design,
Amsterdam CA, 15 Jun 2006
[2006] ECDR 21 228
Buma v KaZaA, Sup Ct Case C-
02/186HR, [2004] ECDR 16 234
Caravan Step I, Dist Ct of The
Hague 19 Mar 2003, [2004] BIE
no 72, 472 504
Caravan Step II, Dist Ct of The
Hague 22 Dec 2004, [2005] BIE
265–71 504
Davidoff/Cigaronne, Dist Ct of The
Hague 22 Dec 2004, [2005] BIE
no 87, 430–37 507
xvi Research handbook on the future of EU copyright
De NV Drukkerij ‘de Spaarnestad’

v Leesinrichting ‘Favoriet’ HR,
25 Jan 1952, [1952] NJ no 95
539
De Telegraaf v NOS, The Hague CA
30 Jan 2001, [2001] Mediaforum
344 434
Drukasbak, 21 Dec 1856, [1960] NJ
414 571
Fatboy bean-bag, Pres Dist Ct of
The Hague 30 Sep 2005 and Dist
Ct of Den Bosch 6 Jun 2007
[2007] AMI 158–9 506
Howe/Casala, Dist Ct of The Hague
17 Oct 2006, unpublished 504
Hyster Karry Krane, 26 June 1953,
[1954] NJ 90 571
Kecofa v Lancôme, [2006] ECDR
26, [2006] NJ 585, Sup Ct 68,
72, 142, 484, 567
Laser Vloerplan, Sup Ct 20 Mar
1992, [1993] BIE 39 516
Layner/Assco, 30 Oct 1998, [1999]
NJ 84 573
Lego v Mega Brands, Dist Ct Breda
6 Jul 2005, LJN 570
Mega Brands v Lego, 12 Jun
2007, Intellectuele Eigendom
en Reclamerecht 2007, no 79,
301 572
Monte/Kwikform, 1 Dec 1989,

[1992] NJ 391 573
Scrabble, 8 Jan 1960, [1960] NJ
415 571
Stichting Baas in Eigen Huis v
Plazacasa BV, Provisional
Measures Judgment, Dist Ct of
Alkmaar, 7 Aug 2007, LJN:
BB1207 570
Stichting Stemra v Free Record Shop
BV, HR 20 Nov 1987, [1988] NJ
280 539
Stokke/Fikszo, Dist Ct of The
Hague 7 Feb 2007 [2007] AMI
99–103 504
Stokke Industries/Jako Trade
en Hauck, Dist Ct of The Hague
4 Oct 2000 [2001] BIE 363
504
Technip Benelux BV v Arier
Gerhard Goossens (2007) 38 IIC
615, Sup Ct 72, 493
Tomado, 12 Jun 1970, [1970] NJ
343 573
United Feature Syndicate Inc v
Van der Meulen Sneek BV
[1990] Bijblad Indutriële
Eigendom 329 461
Van Dale Lexicografie BV v
Rudolph Jan Romme, Sup Ct 4
Jan 1991 [1991] NJ 608; CA

The Hague 1 Apr 1993 [1994]
NJ 58 127
Wokkels Hoge Raad, 11 Nov
1983, [1986] GRUR Int 126–128,
NJ 1984, 203, [1985] BIE no 9,
23 508
Amsterdam Court of Appeal, 16 Jul
1981, [1982] BIE 145; [1982]
AMR, p. 13, note Verkade
(Rubik’s Cube) 505
The Hague Court of Appeal,
21 Dec 2000, [2001] Mediaforum
87 434
The Hague Court of Appeal, 4 Sep
2003, [2003] AMI 222 47
Sup Ct of the Netherlands, 16 Dec
2005, 1st Chamber No
CO4/020/HR (LJN AT2056) 47
Rotterdam Court of First Instance,
22 Aug 2000 [2000] Mediaforum
344 434
Tribunal of The Hague 2 Mar
2005 329
Table of cases xvii
Norway
napster.no Sup Ct 27 Jan 2005
(2006) 37 IIC 120 228
Spain
Judgment of 29 May 1992
(Christmas cards) 118

Judgment of 26 Oct 1992
(Jewelry) 118
Judgment of 10 Oct 1995 (Radio
Nacional de España) 108
Judgment of 8 Nov 1995 (Computer
programs) 104
Judgment of 30 Jan 1996 (Folletto
mamparas de baño) 112
Judgment of 29 Mar 1996
(Photographs) 126
Judgment of 13 May 2002
(Anuncios de empleo) 112
Juzgado de lo Mercantil 1 of
Bilbao, 23 Nov 2007 (Calatrava
bridge) 114
Juzgado de lo Mercantil 1 of
Madrid, 27 Sep 2005 127
Juzgado de lo Mercantil 2 of
Madrid, 9 Jun 2005 117
Audiencia Provincial de Alicante
(s 8) 19 Jun 2006 126
Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona
(s 15) 21 Nov 2003 126
Audiencia Provincial de Madrid
(s 12), 3 Mar 2004 115
Audiencia Provincial de Madrid
(s 20 bis) 12 Jul 2004
(Mararena) 118
Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona
(s 15) 1 Feb 2005 126

Audiencia Provincial de Valencia
(s 9) 3 Jan 2007 118
Audiencia Provincial de Valencia
(s 9) 6 Feb 2007 (photographs of
tombstones) 126
Sweden
Olssons Links Sup Ct 15 Jun 2000,
B 413-00, [2001] GRUR Int
264 228
TV4 AB v Claes Eriksson and
Vilgot Sjöman Sup Ct 18 Mar
2008 271
Yapon AB v Ekström [2002] ECDR
(14) 155 420
Switzerland
Federal Ct, Dec of 22 June 2005,
[2005] Médialex 153 45
Supreme Ct, Canton of Zurich,
Dec 9 Sep 2004, [2004] Médialex
231 45
Unauthorised Reproduction of
Telephone Directories on CD-
Rom [2002] ECDR 3 62, 66
United Kingdom
A Schroeder Music v Macaulay
[1974] 3 All ER 616 306
Amp Inc v Utilux Pty Ltd [1970]
RPC 397, [1970] FSR 162, CA;
[1972] RPC 103, [1971] FSR
572, HL 178, 500

Ashdown v Telegraph Group Ltd 18
July 2001, [2001] EMLR 44 46
Baigent v Random House Group Ltd
(Da Vinci code) High Ct,
Chancery Div 2006 137
Barker Motion Co v Hulton (1912)
28 TLR 496 80
Blacklock v Pearson [1915] 2 Ch
376 289
Blair v Osborne & Tomkins [1971]
2 QB 78, CA 302
xviii Research handbook on the future of EU copyright
Breville Europe plc v Thorn EMI
Domestic Appliances Ltd [1995]
FSR 77 55
British Leyland Motor Corp Ltd v
Armstrong Patents Ltd [1984]
FSR 591 313
Brown v Mcasso Music Production
Ltd [2005] FSR 40 70
Campbell Connelly & Co Ltd v
Noble [1963] 1 WLR 252 477,
478
Cramp v Smythson [1944] AC
329 288
Creation Records v News Group
Newspapers [1997] EMLR 444
54, 57, 68, 69, 70
Designers Guild Ltd v Russell
Williams (Textiles) Ltd [2000]

FSR 121, CA; [2001] FSR 113,
HL 137, 215
Donaldson v Beckett (1774) 2 Bro
PC 129, Burr 2408 243
Elton John v James [1991] FSR
397 306
Exxon v Exxon Insurance [1982] Ch
119 56
Fraser-Woodward Ltd v British
Broadcasting Corp Brighter
Pictures Ltd [2005] EWHC 472
(Ch) 23 Mar 2005 (Beckham
family) 127
Gates v Swift [1982] RPC 339
51
Gilbert O’Sullivan v Management
Agency and Music [1985] QB
428 306
Green v Broadcasting Corporation
of New Zealand [1989] RPC
469 73, 93
Hi Tech Autoparts Ltd v Towergate
Two Ltd (No 2) [2002] FSR
16 55
High Court of Justice, Chancery
Division, 8 February 1982,
Polytechnika Ipari Szovetkezet
c.s. v. Dallas (1982) FSR 52
[1983] GRUR Int. 946 505
Hodgkinson & Corby Ltd and Roho

Inc v Wards Mobility Services
Ltd [1995] FSR 169 569
Hollinrake v Truswell [1894] 3 Ch
420 56
Interlego AG v Tyco Industries Inc
[1988] RPC 343 186
Kabushiki Kaisha Sony Computer
Entertainment Inc et al v Ball
et al [2004] EWHC 1738,
ChD 416, 425
Kelly v Morris (1866) LR 1 Eq
697 289
Kenrick & Co v Lawrence & Co
(1890) 25 QBD 99 137
Ladbroke (Football) Ltd v William
Hill (Football) Ltd [1964] 1
WLR 273, [1964] 1 All ER 465,
HL 65, 288, 289
Landor & Hawa International Ltd v
Azure Designs Ltd [2006] EWCA
Civ 1285, CA 501
Massine v De Basil [1936–45] MCC
223 93
Merchandising Corp of America v
Harpbond [1983] FSR 32 55,
56, 69
Miller v Taylor (1769) 98 ER 201
288
Milligan v Broadway Cinema
Production [1923] SLT 35;

[1922–3] MCC 343 93
Mogul Steamship Co v McGregor
Gow & Co (1889) 23 QBD 598
569
National Provincial Bank v
Ainsworth [1965] AC 1175 291
Table of cases xix
Navitaire Inc v Easyjet Airline Co
Ltd (No 3) [2006] RPC 3 56,
64
Nordisk Films Co Ltd v Onda
[1919–24] MCC 337 83
Norowzian v Arks (No 1) [1998]
FSR 394 57
Norowzian v Arks (No 2) [2000]
FSR 363 56, 71, 89, 92, 93, 96,
97
Novello & Co Ltd v Hinrichsen
Edition Ltd and Another [1951] 1
Ch 595 461
Orwin v Attorney-General [1998]
FSR 415 299
Peer International Corp v Termidor
Music Publishers Ltd [2003]
EWCA Civ 299
Performing Rights Society Ltd v
London Theatre of Varieties Ltd
[1924] AC 1 300
Purefoy v Sykes Boxall (1955) 72
RPC 89 289

Reed Executive plc and Reed
Solutions plc v Reed Business
Information Ltd, Reed Elsevier
(UK) Ltd and Totaljobs.com Ltd
[2003] RPC 12 208
S Panayiotou v Sony Music
Entertainment (UK) [1994]
EMLR 229 306
Sawkins v Hyperion Records
[2005] EWCA Civ 565, [2005]
RPC 32 55, 56, 70, 115, 144,
145, 288
Sega Enterprises v Richards [1983]
FSR 73 51
Sony Computer Entertainment Inc v
Paul Owen and others [2002]
EWHC 45, ChD 416
Stovin-Bradford v Volpoint [1971]
Ch 1007, CA 302
Tate v Fullbrook [1908] 1 KB 821;
98 LT 706; 77 LJKB 577; 24
TLR 347; 52 SJ 276 80, 93
Thrustcode Ltd v WW Computing
Ltd [1983] FSR 502 51
Ultraframe (UK) Ltd v Eurocell
Building Plastics Ltd, Eurocell
Profiles Ltd [2003] EWCA Civ
1805 186
University of London Press v
University Tutorial Press [1916]

2 Ch 601 56, 111, 123, 137,
197, 288, 289
Walter v Lane [1900] AC 539 115
Wham-O Manufacturing Co v
Lincoln Industries [1985] RPC
127 55
United States of America
Atari Games Corporation v Oman
888 F 2d 878 (DC Cir, 1989) 75
Atari Inc v Amusement World Inc
547 F Supp 222 (D Md 1981)
226 75
Baker v Selden 101 US 99, 1879
583
Bridgeport Music Inc v Dimension
Films 410 F 3d 792 (6th Cir
2005) 215, 216
Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co v
Sarony 111 US 53 (1884) 112
Corcovado Music Corp v Hollis
Music 981 F 2d 679 (2d Cir
1993) 477
eBay Inc v MercExchange LLC 126
S Ct 1837 (2006) 278–9
Data Gen Corp v Grumman Sys
Support Corp 36 F 3d 1147 (1st
Cir, 1994) 544
Diamond v Chakrabarty 447 US 303
(1980), 100 S Ct 2204, 65 L Ed
2d 144, 206 USPQ 193 568

xx Research handbook on the future of EU copyright
Edison v Lublin 122 Fed 240 (CCA
3d 1903) 80
Feist Publications Inc v Rural
Telephone Service Co (1991) 499
US 340 62, 111, 127, 294
Granz v Harris 198 F 2d 585 (2d Cir
1952) 279
M Kramer Manufacturing Co Inc v
Andrews 783 F 2d 421 (4th Cir,
1986) 436 75
MGM v Grokster 545 US 913, 125 S
Ct 2764 (2005) 234
Midway mfg Co v Dirkschneider 543
F Supp 466 (D Neb, 1981) 75
Midway Manufacturing Co v Stohon
564 F Supp 741 (ND Ill, 1983)
746 75
Sheldon v Metro-Goldwyn
Pictures Corp 81 F 2d 49 (2nd
Cir 1936) 117
Sony Corp of America v Universal
City Studios Inc 464 US 417
(1984) 611
Stern Electronics v Kaufman
669 F 2d 852 (2nd Cir, 1982)
855 75
Trade Mark Cases 100 US 82
(1879) 112
US v IBM (filed in District Ct

17 Jan 1969, withdrawn 8 Jan
1982) 401
Williams Electronics v Artic
International 685 F 2d 870 (3rd
Cir, 1982) 874 75
Table of cases xxi
Introduction
Estelle Derclaye
Several things prompted the idea for this book in Autumn 2006. First, it was
15 years since the EU had started harmonising copyright law. If we include the
Community courts case law, harmonisation – albeit indirect – dates back to
1971 with Deutsche Grammophon
1
the first decision in the field of copyright
which, in a groundbreaking way not only decided that copyright was within
the competence of the Community but also that in the context of the free
movement of goods and services, an end should be put to protectionism by
creating the concept of European exhaustion. Second, the Commission’s
harmonisation plans in the field of copyright had recently come to a standstill,
as no proposal had been launched since the Resale Right Directive or the
Horizontal Enforcement Directive.
2
Third, I was also aware of the Wittem
project, which gathers a group of renowned copyright academics who review
all areas of copyright law with the aim of drafting a European copyright code.
3
In the light of this initiative and with the – admittedly ambitious – aim of influ-
encing European copyright policy, I wanted the book not only to take stock but
1

1
Deutsche Grammophon v. Metro, ECJ, 8 June 1971, Case 78/70, ECR [1971]
487.
2
Writing in 2006, T. Dreier and P. B. Hugenholtz, Concise European Copyright
Law, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer, 2006, p. 2 noted that currently the Commission does
not see ‘any problems with regard to the internal market’ and does not ‘envisage further
harmonisation measures’. Note however the still embryonic initiative in the field of online
music licensing discussed by M.M. Frabboni in Chapter 15, and more recently, the
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the
European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on Creative
Content Online in the Single Market of 3 January 2008, COM(2007) 836 final and the
proposal to extend the term of protection for performers and sound recordings to 95 years.
See />h
t
m. In July this year, the Commission adopted a Green paper on Copyright in the
Knowledge Economy whose aim is to consult on whether we need to fine tune existing
exceptions in particular those for research and teaching and for the benefit of disabled
persons and address the issue of orphan works and user-created content. See
/>(all websites in this introduction were last accessed on 8 October 2008).
3
Which Bernt Hugenholtz mentions in his contribution (Chapter 1). At the time
of writing this introduction, the group had just finished writing its draft code.
also to question what the future of EU copyright should be, by answering
questions such as: what went wrong with the harmonisation acquis? What did
the Directives do well? Should copyright be further harmonised? To that end,
not only did I wish to invite contributions from recognised European copyright
scholars but I also wanted to have the views of experts from as many different
Member States as possible to give a truly European, and therefore hopefully
balanced outlook. Finally, I thought the book would also be timely and useful

as, apart from the usually three-yearly (and also generally short) reports from the
Commission on each Directive, there had not yet been a comprehensive and crit-
ical examination of the European Union’s harmonisation work and lack thereof.
4
Against this backdrop, the method followed in the book is as follows. Each
copyright issue (subject-matter, originality, duration, rights, defences, etc.) is
analysed by a different European copyright expert, who gives a critical account
of the EU harmonisation done on it (or lack thereof) and explores whether
further harmonisation is desirable or not. The aim of this introduction is to give
readers a snapshot of the chapters that will help map out their reading.
In the first chapter, Bernt Hugenholtz highlights that despite the impressive
harmonisation work done by the European Commission, the territorial nature
of copyright fundamentally undermines it, even though the Directives have
certainly brought the national copyright laws closer and they are now in many
respects therefore very similar. He notes however that the territorial nature of
copyright arguably preserves cultural diversity as well as price discrimination
within the Union, although the latter arguably goes against the achievement of
the internal market. Hugenholtz therefore advocates the introduction of a
Community Copyright Regulation in the vein of the Community Trade Mark
and Design Regulations, but one that would pre-empt national copyright laws
and therefore go further than the latter two regulations.
Christophe Geiger looks at the relationship between copyright and human
rights. Human rights are part of the European framework through the applica-
tion within the EU of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and
the recent integration of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European
Union by the Lisbon Treaty, and the ECHR has recently clearly ruled that
intellectual property rights (IPR) are human rights. Therefore, the European
Court of Justice (ECJ) and national courts have started balancing copyright
with other human rights. Geiger reviews these developments in the case law
2 Research handbook on the future of EU copyright

4
See, however, the very useful commentary on copyright Directives by Dreier
and Hugenholtz, supra n. 2 and the study commissioned by DG Internal Market and
drafted by IVIR (P.B. Hugenholtz et al.) ‘The recasting of copyright and related rights
for the knowledge economy’, no. etd/2005/im/d1/95, 2006, available at .
europa.eu/internal_market/copyright/docs/studies/etd2005imd195recast_report_2006.
pdf.

×