PHU THUT CU NI CH U TR TNG MCH CH
CHU MN TÍNH
Phan Quốc Hùng, Phạm Minh Ánh, Nguyễn Đình Long Hải
Khoa Phu thut Lng ngc - Mch máu, Bnh vin Ch Ry
Mục tiêu: -
Phương pháp:
-
-
dáu
Kết quả:
--
--
Kết luận: -
SUMMARY
AORTOFEMORAL GRAFTING BYPASS IN TREATMENT OF CHRONIC
AORTOILIAC OCCLUSION
Objective: evaluate the early outcome of aortofemoral grafting bypass in chronic aortoiliac
occlusion (CAO) treatment.
Method: From July, 2010 to January, 2011 ten patients CAO were operated at Choray
hospital. They were included in prospective study and underwent aortofemoral reconstruction
with graft implantation. Symptoms before and after surgery, location and extent of arterial
occlusion, operation method, mortality, morbidity, ABI before and after surgery were examined.
Postoperative CTA was indicated for evaluating graft patency.
Results: There were 7 males, 3 females, mean age 53,9 years. Life-limiting claudication was
present in 8 patients, 2 patients had leg ulcer or gangrene. 10 patients CAO consist of type I: 2,
type II: 4, type III: 4. Juxtarenal aortic occlusion: 2, 1 renal artery (RA) stenosis, 1 superior
mesenteric artery (SMA) stenosis.
Aortofemoral bypass: 8/10 cases, aortoiliac bypass: 2/10, 1 RA reconstruction, 1 SMA
reconstruction. No postoperative mortality, complications occurred in 3 patients: acute renal
failure and haemorrhage: 1 case, graft thrombosis: 2 cases.
ABI before surgery: 0.50+/-0.19, after surgery: 0.98+/-0.34. Postoperative CTA: 9 patent
graft, 1 occluded graft.
Conclusion: aortofemoral grafting reconstruction had an excellent symptomatic relief in
CAO treatment.
2
t
8].
-
85-90% [1
- - -
- 8].
Nhìn c
-
-
-
-
- -
-
hân.
- - n-
-
7/
2
u ngoài ( Nhóm II)
4
4
- -
- 0.19 v- 0.34
h [4
Tapper [7
[4] là 73%.
5
-Stiff [3
- -
-- -
n-
-
8].
-
3].
[69]
- -
-
1
Yves Alimi [10]
0.42+/-0.11
0.81+/-0.12
John Ligush [4]
0.32+/-0.15
0.88+/-0.15
P.Q.Hùng
0.50+/-0.19
0.98+/-0.34
-
1. David C. Brewster (1997). Current controversies in the management of aortoiliac
occlusion. J Vas Surg, 25: 365-79
2. David C. Brewster (2004). Aortoiliac, aortofemoral, iliofemoral arteriosclerotic
occlusive diseases. In: Haimovici 5ed, Vascular Surgery. Massachusettes, U.S.A:
Blackwell, p499-521
3. Gareth Morris Stiff, Samuel Ogunbiyi, Richard K Winter, Russel Brown, Michael H
Lewis (2008). Aortic replacement in aorto-occlusive disease: an observational study.
BMC Sugery; 8:19
4. John Ligush, Jr, Enrique Criado, Steven J. Burnham,George Johnson, Jr and Blair A.
Keagy (1996). Management and outcome of chronic artherosclerosis infrarenal aortic
occlusion. J Vas surg; 24: p394-405
5. Jung IM, Lee TS, Ha J, Kim SJ (1998). Chronic abdominal aortic occlusion. J Korean
Vas Surg Soc, Apr; 14(1): p66-76
6. Takehisa Iwai, Shoji Sato, Yoshinori Inoue (1996). Perioperative management of
juxtarenal aortic occlusion. Vascular and endovascular surgery; 30(2): p109-115
7. Tapper SS, Jenkins JM, Edwards WH, et al (1992). Juxtarenal aortic occlusion. Ann
Surg; 215: p443-50
8. Thomas.F.Rehring, David C. Brewster (2000). Aortic reconstructionfor occlusive disease.
In: Jeffrey L.Ballard, Aortic Sugery. Texas, U.S.A: Landes Bioscience, P120-123
9. Timothy J. Nypaver, Alexander D.Shepard, Daniel J. Reddy (1993). Supraceliac aortic
cross-clamping: determinants of outcome in elective abdominal aortic reconstruction. J
Vas Surg, 17: p868-76
10. Yves Alimi, Giovanni De Caridi, Olivier Hartung (2004). Laparoscopy-assisted
reconstruction to treat severe aortoiliac occlusive disease: early and midterm results.
Journal of Vascular surgery; 39(4): p777-83