Tổng hợp câu hỏi và bài mẫu IELTS Writing Task 2 chủ đề Giáo Dục

VnDoc - Tải tài liệu, văn bản pháp luật, biểu mẫu miễn phí

Tổng hợp câu hỏi và bài mẫu IELTS Writing Task 2 chủ đề Giáo Dục
1. University education should be free to everyone, regardless of income.To what extent do you agree
or disagree?
Model Answer 1:
Education is an important part of everyone's life and it plays a very important role in the growth of an
individual. Making education free for everyone and managing all by the government will be a very big
step towards the rapid growth of a society. All parents want to make their children educated by sending
them to school, colleges but sometimes due to the lack of resources, they have to deprive their children
even from the basic education. By making education free of all will ensure that nobody will miss
education just because they can’t afford to pay.
A government's step of making the education free will set an example in our society. It will show that if
you have a strong will and determination to study and prosper, not having any money or resource will not
stop you from making a paradigm shift.
Education with no fees will identify all those talents which can be at top given education and guidance but
get lost because their parents can’t afford to pay for schools. Everyone will stand equal chance to succeed.
It will increase the literacy rate of that country and will improve the growth of that country as well. It was
seen in the past that countries having higher literacy rates have been more successful. By making
education free, a majority of people will be educated, making overall a positive environment in our society.
There will be fewer crimes in society. Educating people will be making them more responsible.
Governments should put more emphasis on education by making it free. Just like food and shelter
education should also be a basic right and free for everyone.
Model Answer 2:
The opinion that every citizen should have the right to study at school or university for free is very
controversial one. Those, who disagree, refer to enormous expenditures of government in case of
establishing such laws. Although, I hold the viewpoint that not charging people for education could
become very beneficial for a country and its economy.
First, young people from poor families could be very smart. Looking back to history and biographies of
distinguished people, raised in poverty can illustrate this best. Making schooling available only for
fortunate is not fair. Moreover, the state well-being could also be affected, because there would be a lack

of talented specialists, whose skills was not discovered and developed by proper training.
Another advantage of making education free of charge is the happiness of the nation. An individual's
inability to collect the amount of money he needs to pay school or university fee cause stress and anxiety
in the middle-class society, which can even keep them from having children. Nowadays we can see that


VnDoc - Tải tài liệu, văn bản pháp luật, biểu mẫu miễn phí
the lowest birthrate is in countries where prices of enrollment to highest education institutions are very
high. This clearly indicates the fact that citizens of rich countries do not feel able to provide their future
offspring proper education.
Finally, nothing seems to be more beneficial to a country's economy than an educated and intelligent
nation. Free courses and study programs can prepare excellent specialists, who would work to bring profit
themselves and hence their country. That would surely compensate most expenses of state budget caused
by education of no charge.
To sum up, even though making all schools free can be very expensive for a state's economy, advantages
are invaluable. After several years such improvements would bring fruits of happy, intelligent nation
confident about its future.
2. Everyone should stay in school until the age of eighteen. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Read the IELTS compulsory education essay
Everyone should stay in school until the age of eighteen. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is often said that if you want to succeed in life, you need a proper education. While there may be
arguments for making school compulsory until the age of 18 , I disagree that this should apply to
everyone.
Perhaps the strongest reason for not leaving school early is that it prepares you for your working career. If
you leave school early with only a basic education, you are unlikely to be able to find any skilled work.
Indeed, the education you receive between the ages of 16 and 18 is crucial for anyone who does not want a
lifetime of unskilled work in a factory.
Another compelling reason for remaining in school until 18 is that school provides moral and social
education too. This is particularly important for

people between 16 and 18 who have many temptations

and benefit from the organised framework that school provides. Young people who stay in school until the
age of 18 tend to be more responsible and help build a stronger society.
There are, however, equally strong arguments against making school compulsory until the age of 18. One
such argument is that not everyone is academic and that some people benefit more from vocational
training. For instance, someone who wants to become a car mechanic may find better training and more
satisfaction in an apprentice scheme. Another related argument is that, in today’s world, young people are
maturing ever more quickly and are able to make their own life decisions by the age of 16.
To my mind, everyone should be encouraged to stay in school until 18 both for social and career reasons.
However, I believe it would be a mistake to make this compulsory bearing in mind that different people
have different needs and abilities and the possibilities of other forms of vocational training.
3. Subjects such as Art, Sport and Music are being dropped from the school curriculum for subjects


VnDoc - Tải tài liệu, văn bản pháp luật, biểu mẫu miễn phí
such as Information Technology. Many people children suffer as a result of these changes. To what
extent would you support or reject the idea of moving these subjects from school curriculum?
In recent times there has been much debate about which subjects should be included on the school
curriculum. One particular issue is whether the introduction of more modern subjects such as IT for more
traditional subjects such as art and music disadvantages the pupils. I believe that this is a difficult question
and different solutions need to be found for primary and secondary schools.
There is one major argument in favour of replacing art, music and sport on the curriculum with subjects
like IT. This is that the purpose of school is to prepare children for their working life after school, so the
subjects on the curriculum should be relevant to their potential careers. From this point of view, IT is
much relevant to schoolchildren as they need to be computer literate if they want to survive in the
workplace. For example, it is easy to see that word processing and programming skills will impress
employers more than the ability to run fast or draw well.
There are also, however, strong arguments for retaining the more traditional subjects as part of the
curriculum. One significant counter-argument is that the purpose of education is not just to prepare

children for later careers, but also to develop their all round “culture”. It is important that children leave
school with some knowledge of art, music and sport as all these are all help develop aspects of young
people’s personalities.
My own personal point of view is that there is merit in both sides of the debate and that all children should
study some IT, art music and sport at least at primary school. At secondary school, however, children
should be offered a choice between these subjects so that they can continue to study them if they wish.
4. In the past lectures were the traditional method of teaching large numbers of students. Nowadays
new technology is increasingly being used to teach students. What are the advantages and
disadvantages of this new approach? Sample essay with detailed vocabulary help and advice on
structuring the essay for coherence.
As we move into the twenty-first century, technology is affecting many different areas of life and
education is no exception. Indeed, in some institutions traditional forms of education have been
revolutionised by new technology to the extent that the lecture is no longer the main method of delivery.
While there are a variety of benefits to this new approach, there are also significant drawbacks.
Perhaps the greatest bonus of the introduction of technology is the flexibility it offers. This is evident in
two different ways. Firstly, it is now no longer essential for students to be present in the lecture theatre for
their courses. This means that part-time courses for adults who are in employment and distance learning
courses for people in other countries are now much more practical. Another area of flexibility is of course
that the lecturer and tutor are able to use Moodles, interactive whiteboards and other tools to deliver their


VnDoc - Tải tài liệu, văn bản pháp luật, biểu mẫu miễn phí
courses in a more stimulating way to large numbers of students.
Not everything, however, about the introduction of this new technology into education is positive. One
major problem is that not all students are comfortable with using technology, even if they are part of the
digital native generation. This is a serious issue as they may suffer from their lack of technological skills.
Another related issue is that education is a human activity and it works best with as much human
interaction as possible. Impersonal technology cannot replace the human contact found in traditional
face-to-face tutorials and seminars.
As we have seen, there are major benefits to the introduction of technology into education, not least

because it enables modern forms of education such as distance learning courses. This is balanced, however,
by the fact that it can be too impersonal for some and disadvantages others for their lack of technological
skills.
5. Some people believe that exams are an inappropriate way of measuring students’ performance
and should be replaced by continuous assessment. Do you agree or disagree with this view? Sample
essay with detailed advice on improving your paragraph structure.
Sample Answer 1:
Exams have always been used as a way to measure students’ ability. However, I contend that it is not an
appropriate way to determine one’s performance and it should be substituted by continuous assessment.
The reasons for my contention are as follows.
Nowadays cheating on exams is a commonplace and therefore it is not uncommon for students who don’t
do well in the class to score high on the exams. Thus, when the circumstance occurs, there’s no way for
authorities to confirm whether or not the answers on the exams are really from the students and not the
results of unfair play. Try as teachers might to forestall cheating from taking place, be it by strict
invigilating or by the threat to fail the students who don’t abide by the rules, there’s still no way to
ascertain that every student will comply with the rules, hence the ineffectiveness of utilizing exams as a
way of measuring the ability of each student.
Furthermore, students have the tendency to memorize for exams without putting any effort in trying to
thoroughly understand the materials taught. They will strive to obtain the highest score possible by this
means. Memorizing is surely a quick way to obtain a good score in a short time; however it is not an
effective way to study if one wants to deeply understand the materials. Consequently, exams are not
appropriate when used to measure the ability of the students who memorize.
In conclusion, I believe that the best way to determine a student’s ability is to continuously assess their
performance in the classroom. By doing that, fair judgment of each student’s ability will be ensured and
students will also be fairly scored based on how well they do inside the class.


VnDoc - Tải tài liệu, văn bản pháp luật, biểu mẫu miễn phí
6. Some people argue that universities should provide students with more practical training for their
future career. Should university education be more vocational or academic. Discuss.

Sample Answer 1:
The primary purpose of tertiary education is to prepare graduates for their future career. While thousands
of people would enrol for the sake of acquiring general knowledge and skills which will make them
competitive on the job market, there is a portion of them who would expect to obtain the specific
qualifications only for their dream job. Therefore, I strongly believe that university should organise their
courses’ programs in order to provide future employees with all the skill sharpening professional training
for their specific occupation.
One compelling reason for this is that all the contemporary occupations nowadays are task specific which
makes it a necessity for workers to be able to comply with every job requirement. Once they graduate they
are expected to take over all the responsibilities their job needs them to do, have the know-how, as well as
the expertise to carry out all the arduous and demanding tasks. For instance, as soon as I graduated at the
Faculty of Philology I had to take a part-time teaching job. I was overwhelmed with all the expectations
my employer had in everyday practice, whereas there was no need at all of all the theory I had mastered
throughout my studies.
On the other hand, it is beyond doubt that most of the jobs would require employees to do a lot of
multi-tasking and to be capable of meeting deadlines while conducting project work. Apparently, big
companies would prefer to employ a person well-equipped with all the necessary knowledge related to
several positions within their range, instead of over-staffing. Notwithstanding the competitiveness among
businesses, there is always a huge demand for the top notch professionals within one sector. This will be
possible, only and only if universities raise their standards and provide broad education and practice for
their students.
In conclusion, I would maintain that tertiary education should be more content-specific and ensure the
fastest and highest quality for their graduates. Not only will professionals be able to use their university
knowledge as a catalyst towards their career, but they will be able to make a living out of it for a lifetime.
7. In many countries schools have severe problems with student behaviour. What do you think are
the causes of this? What solutions can you suggest?
In numerous nations educational institutions are facing serious difficulties with the conduct of their pupils.
This essay will suggest that poor parenting is the root cause of this phenomenon and submit that a public
awareness campaign is the most viable solution, followed by a reasoned conclusion.
The principal cause of poor discipline in schools is poor discipline at home. Many mothers and fathers

either do not have the time or the skills required to teach their youngsters the value of manners and


VnDoc - Tải tài liệu, văn bản pháp luật, biểu mẫu miễn phí
respecting authority. This results in many young people not listening to their teachers, being rude and
actively rebelling against rules and regulations. For example, a recent study by Cambridge University
found that 1 in 3 teenagers would refuse to comply with a rule if they didn’t agree with it, compared to just
1 in 8 in a similar study in 1990.
The most practical solution to this problem is a government sponsored awareness campaign. An effective
advertising campaign could warn of the dangers of misbehaviour and hopefully raise awareness amongst
the public.

For example, the United Kingdom recently lobbied their citizens to teach their children about

the importance of respecting teachers and this resulted in a dramatic improvement.
In summary, widespread negative behaviour in the classroom has been caused by caregivers not instilling
the values of deference and civility in their offspring; however this can be tackled through a public
education programme that promotes these values. It is also recommended that people should attend
parenting classes before their child starts kindergarten.
8. Many universities charge higher fees for foreign students. Why do they do this? Do you believe
that it is fair?
Model Answer 1:
Universities are the best place students always choose after their tertiary schooling. Most of the students
prefer to study in a good university. In my point of view, universities take a large amount of money from
foreign students because they have to keep their standard and I think it is fair to take more money from the
foreign students.
Firstly, universities carry out a particular standard and reputation. When students choose a selected
university to study, it increases their productivity as well as overall development. The university charges
huge fees for outside students so that they can have qualified and experienced lecturers to teach and mould
them. There will be many facilities for the students to access like library, laboratories, multi-purpose halls

and so on. Universities offer accommodation and food to the students. Students can achieve their dream by
studying in a reputed university with excellent professional background.
Secondly, it is fair to take high fees from the foreign students because if they are getting the quality
education and facilities it is worth to get the money from them. They have many options in subjects and it
satisfies them by choosing the best university to study. On the other hand, universities do not take much
payment from the citizens, they always try to care and protect their citizens by giving good quality
education. Moreover, many universities prefer more opportunities for the students to grow as an individual
and to get a good job in the future by giving the very good education. Many universities have a different
policy for foreign students and they usually take a higher fee from them. The citizens of a country already
pay a large amount of tax to the government and thus government ensures the education for their children


VnDoc - Tải tài liệu, văn bản pháp luật, biểu mẫu miễn phí
and grand children. So it is totally justified that local students should pay less.
To sum up, universities can charge huge fees from the students and the university should make sure that
they are giving the best education to the students according to their wish.
9. Most university graduates earn more money than less well educated people. Some people argue
that this means they should pay the full cost of their education. To what extent do you agree or
disagree?
Some conclude that college students should bear total expenses for their higher education on the
generalization that college graduates usually receive higher salaries for similar jobs than those without a
college degree. We can not deny the fact that higher level of education, indeed, do associate with better
income. Still, build on such fact alone, the conclusion remains questionable when more aspects are taken
into consideration.
The whole argument in question rests on an assumption that it is always the case that people with higher
education make more money than those less well-educated. But salary or income is, in most cases, based
on contributions made by employees to companies or organizations in which they are employed. Statistics
in the labor market indicate that people with professional training tend to find jobs easier than college
graduates do and that blue-collar workers who do not hold college degrees are becoming the hotties in the
labor market. Employers prefer to hire and pay more to highly skilled and specially trained people rather

than fresh college graduates. In the auto industry, for instance, skilled technicians make two or three times
more than their college educated counterparts who make the average salaries in other companies. And it is
widely accepted that people's income is determined more by talent, hard work, and willingness to take
risks than solely by certain qualifications such as college education. Otherwise, the unemployment rate of
college graduates would not be increasing every year and the rule of supply and demand will lose much of
power in controlling the labor market. Admittedly in some knowledge extensive field such as research,
teaching, and practice of law the labor force are primarily consists of highly educated professionals. But
such people make up only a fraction of the labor market and are thus unrepresentative of the whole
employment in general.
Considering the goal of education, we find that it is even more problematic for the country to throw all the
responsibility of financing college education to college students. The goal of higher education of a nation
is to improve and strengthen the general level of intellectual and professional capacity of its labor force,
thereby increasing the competency of the nation in the global economy. As tax payers, parents all
contributes to the education system and country in various ways. It is only reasonable and necessary that
the country gives some forms of financially assistance to students to ease the burden of rising education
costs. Such help should go to not only students from needy or impoverished families but also outstanding


VnDoc - Tải tài liệu, văn bản pháp luật, biểu mẫu miễn phí
students from affluent backgrounds. Doing so can significantly boost the motivation of children from
millions of families to engage in higher level of study. It is understandable that the general quality of
people in a country will improve and its economy will benefit both now and in years to follow.
If the burden of supporting children's higher education is dumped on parents and students, thousands of
brilliant students will be deprived of chances to pursue their academic inspiration. Among those who
suffer would definitely be future great scientists, business managers, artists and statesmen. The loss will be
disastrous and irreversible.
In conclusion, the idea that students should also pay the full cost of their study is wrong and harmful
because it is wrong to assume that higher education necessarily equalize high income. Moreover, it is in
the best interest of a nation to take responsibility in financing college education so that the goal of higher
education will be better met.

10. Nothing is more important to a country’s future than education. To what extent do you agree or
disagree?