963 bài essays mẫu part 25

For more material and information, please visit Tai Lieu Du Hoc at
www.tailieuduhoc.org
Please preserve the old, historic buildings. Those buildings are the unlimited values for a
city and they are the gift from ancestors

Essay 365 Topic 65 Should a city perserve its historic buildings or replace them with
modern ones?

In the world, many countries have many old building in their city. Some people thought
that they should destroy it to build modern buildings but some people said that we had to
prevent it because it`s very important for their countries. My opinion, I think we should
and have to prevent or conserve it because I have several reasons such as all of it will be
the world heritages, it also will be an achievement of our ancestors and it can teach us
about old techniques and methods to construct these buildings to give some idea for our
next generation.

First of all, these building will become world heritage if it has been approximately one
hundred years old so the UNESCO(United Nations for Educational Scientific and
Cultural Organization)will recognize and put it in the list of world heritage. Also, it is
very important for our economy because many tourist would like to visit all world
heritage in the world so we can earn much money from their visit or buying some
souvenir gifts in our historic areas or buildings.

Secondly, these historic building will illustrate the people in the world about our ancestor
achievements. It also will be a proud of your country in the future. For example, the
Great Wall in China have been a world heritage that recognize by UNESCO since 1987.
All Chinese people are very proud of this monument. It also can improve Chinese idea try
to prevent it and give its value to human value because all building are human value for
all people in the world.

Finally, the historic monument or building can tell us about the ancestor techniques to

build that building or monument so all people should prevent and preserve it because it
will teach us to know their ideas. For example, Angkor Wat temple have been a world
heritage since 1992 by UNESCO, its location is in Siem Reap Province in Kingdom of
Cambodia, some foreign organizations went to study of conservation and preservation
this temple because they wanted to know how they(khmer ancestor) could build this
temple, why they built it and which method that they used. Now, four or five foreign
organizations have studied some temple in Angkor are such as JSA(Japanese government
for Safeguarding of Angkor), SOPHIA, Monument Fund, and some organization from
India, Italy, and Southeast Asia. Then, they will report in the annual meeting and publish
some documentaries that they study and research to Cambodian government and students.

In conclusion, all historic building have a lot of benefit that we can take from it and it`s
better than we destroy it to build modern building for only the business. Some develop
countries have changed their idea from destroy to prevent these old buildings since
1980s,so I think all countries in the world should prevent and conserve their historic
buildings rather than destroy it.
For more material and information, please visit Tai Lieu Du Hoc at
www.tailieuduhoc.org

Essay 366 Topic 65 Preserving historic buildings

Currently, some cities are facing the situation whether to preserve the old, historic
buildings or to destroy them and replace them with modern buildings. In my opinion, a
wise solution to this dilemma depends on the circumstances. Firstly, it is obviously that
the historic buildings are valuable and deserve being preserved. The old buildings are an
important aspect of the traditional culture; they represent the history of a country or a
culture. For example, the Forbidden City, lying in the center of Peking, is one of the
representatives of the long history of China. Every day, visitors from all over the world
go there to have a look on the palaces where Emperors lived thousands of years ago.
These kind of historic buildings reminder people the history, and is reasonable to be well

preserved. Secondly, some historic buildings are excellent textbooks on architecture, and
need good care. One cannot imagine how clever the ancient architects were; they
invented so many artful techniques and adopted these on their works. Every ancient
building that lasts till today is a good example for certain architectural technique. One
will be surprised to know that some of the ancient stone bridges in China have last for
thousands of years. They are strong enough to suffer the ages. What is more, some of the
techniques have been lost and people can no longer reproduce such bridges. The current
architects realize that even with the modern techniques, people can hardly build as a
lasting stone bridges as those ancient ones. These kind of historic buildings are supposed
to be preserved. However, there are some exceptions. In some historic town in China,
there are a lot of similar historic buildings. These cities cannot develop themselves any
more because there no more space, unless they destroy some of the historic buildings. As
a case in point, in my hometown, there used to be a large amount of historic housings,
each of which is hundreds of years old. In this case, the best solution is, as the
government has done, to preserve a few of these buildings as representations, and destroy
the others in order to build new ones. By this means, we not only preserve the history but
also develop ourselves. In sum, people should preserve the historic buildings. But we
should leave enough space for the development of modern buildings.

Essay 367 Topic 66 Are classmates a more important influence to a child than
parents?

Although students stay with their classmates all time in school, parents are a more
important influence on a child`s success. I disagree with the statement that classmates are
a more important influence on a child`s success in school, because of the reasons as
follows.
First of all, parents are the people who understand their own children best. They know the
children`s good sides and bad habits. They can correct the children`s bad idea and make
them give rid of the bad habits. So children can found a good base to get success in
school. But classmates cannot do this work.

For more material and information, please visit Tai Lieu Du Hoc at
www.tailieuduhoc.org
The other reason is that parents have experiences on a lot of matters. If children have
problems, parents can give them their experiences to help them solve problems. If parents
have no similar experiences, they still can give their children some advice and make them
avoid the wrong directions. Classmates can also give children some help, but they do not
have more experiences than parents. So their influence is less than that of parents.
Parents also have other important influence on their children`s success in school. Parents
may analyze something in different ways and have different opinions from children.
Classmates also can have different opinions on one thing, but they are at the same
conditions with each other, their opinions may be similar or narrow. Children can learn
more comprehensive knowledge about on thing from their parents.
So, based on the above discussion, I think it is clear that parents are a more important
influence than classmates on a child`s success in school.

Essay 368 Topic 66 Are classmates a more important influence to a child than
parents?

I strongly disagree that classmates are a more important influence than parents on a
child`s success in school. I would like to say, there is no substitution for parents. They
could teach their children how to tell right from wrong, and set the best model for
children. At first, I think the parent`s function of udgment?can never be substituted. In
my opinion, family school is like a small society, where children learn how to socialize
themselves. However, children would not know how to behave accurately by the
imitation or competition of their peer group. They might learn something inappropriate,
which they cannot judge by their own, and that is the main function of family.

Second, I believe that parents are always the best model. In most of families, the parents
know their own duty--they should be responsible for the whole society, and then they will
try to treat their children correctly. Nevertheless, the students in school are not. They just

like different shapes of clay, needing to be educated. If your child learns how to behave
according to what their classmates do, they will never know the correct way.

I will not deny the importance of child`s classmates at school. However, they cannot
always point out the correct direction for their friend. The function of family could never
be replaced. Our parents play a very significant role in out initial learning, how to behave,
and where is the model to follow, which our classmates could not do exactly.

Essay 369 Topic 66 Are classmates a more important influence to a child than
parents?

Some people hold the opinion that classmates are a more important influence than parents
on a child`s success in school. As far as I am concerned, parents act the big role than the
classmates for the child`s success in school. I explain my main reasons as follow.

For more material and information, please visit Tai Lieu Du Hoc at
www.tailieuduhoc.org
Firstly, the children have used a lot of time with his or her parents than classmates. When
the parents pay more attentions on their child, child will get the influence by their
parents. Furthermore, children need good model to imitate. The parents live with them
everyday. So the parents play the main actors to be intimated. People say that like father
like son. It means if the parents behave good attitude to others, children will learn the
same attitude from their parents.

Secondly, when the children have made the fault, the good words and advices decide
children the set of value, because parent advices and behaviors always have been
followed by their child. The Classmates have not this kind of chance to influence your
children. For example, when children have told the lie to others, parents attitude decide
the children`s behaviors in the future. If parents can tell them what is right and what is
wrong. The children have less chance to be a bad boy or girl.

Although parents give more influent to a child`s success in the school than the classmates
do. I have to say that classmates also can influence to a child. Whole classmates of the
child are hardworking students, the children will learn from the others. They will want to
be an up-and-coming person in one day. However, compared with the parents influence,
this is one of the small factors, just like many others contribute a child`s success.

In a word, if a child`s success in the school, the parent attitude plays ninety-nine
percentage factors. We may reach the conclusion that ike father like son. ?The parents
play correctly behavior children always follow it and vice versa.

Essay 370 Topic 67 Inexperienced, cheap workers vs. experienced, expensive
workers

Some employers prefer to hire people who have work experiences and pay them higher
salaries. They may think that if they want to make a success in business, they have to do
so. If I were an employer, however, I would rather hire the inexperienced employees and
paid them relatively lower salaries. I do not care about whether experiences an employee
has or not, I really care about the cost. Besides, it needs not only experiences to do a job
well and experienced workers may not definitely be suitable to certain job position.

Hiring an experienced employee to do a job that he has experienced means that he can
easily make the job done or do it efficiently. But here is the problem. I am a poor boss.
As a young man, I have not earned much money myself. The experienced worker always
asks too high salary to afford at my present financial condition. If I managed to pay
employees higher salaries, it would probably push me to close my business eventually.
So, I need to hire the inexperienced workers with lower salaries to cut down the cost of
my business.

To run business well, I have to consider a lot of other factors of an employee, not only the

employee`s experience. Is the employee loyal to me? Could he probably cheat me in
business operation? I really concern with these questions. If he chose to be not loyal to
For more material and information, please visit Tai Lieu Du Hoc at
www.tailieuduhoc.org
me or chose to cheat me at work, the experiences he has would be useless for my
business. Considering of this, I would rather hire a worker who is inexperienced but loyal
to me and trustworthy.

An employee who has a lot of experiences does not always mean that he is just suitable to
an assigned job. Someone who has experiences does not mean that he has experienced
just this present job. His experiences are simply related with his former jobs. Everything
can be changed over time and the needs for the same job can be changed, too. So, if I
hired an experienced worker, perhaps I would still have to train him for just the present
job again. Thus, if I have to train an experienced employee and pay him higher salary,
why not train an inexperienced employee and pay him lower salary, now that I have to
train any employee anyway? The cost of training is just the same, but the salaries I have
to pay later are different: the former is higher; the latter, lower. Anyone who has normal
sense will definitely choose the latter: the inexperienced but cheaper employee.
In short, taking the cost, the suitability and the loyalty and honesty of employees into
consideration, if I were an employer, I would definitely hire the inexperienced employees
and pay them lower salaries.

Essay 371 Topic 67 Inexperienced, cheap workers vs. experienced, expensive
workers

To hire an inexperienced worker at a lower salary or an experienced worker at a higher
salary, this is an interesting question for an employer. As far as I am concerned, a good
employer will choose the latter without hesitation, because he knows an experienced
worker deserves what he is paid.

Qualified workers play the most important role in any business. Directorate controls the
business, managers manipulate the business, whereas, it is nobody else but the workers
who are expected and responsible to make the products available and qualified. And
product, without which the business will be a castle in the air, is the virtual pith of the
business. Thus qualified workers are indispensable for an employer.

What makes a qualified worker? Undoubtedly, experience is one of the most valued
merits. Experience means quality and efficiency; both of them guarantee a well-run
business. It is true that the employer has to pay more for an experienced worker, but what
such a worker earns the employer is much more than he is paid.

Admittedly, no one is born to be an experienced worker. A rookie is inevitably a rookie at
his debut, and he needs opportunity to obtain the required experience. Hence there must
be some employers who are willing to provider them with such opportunities.

In a word, for an employer, it is profitable to hire an experienced worker at a higher
salary than to an inexperienced one at a lower salary. However, some wise employer may
want to hire inexperienced workers with potential.