Tải bản đầy đủ (.pdf) (1 trang)

Listen To VOA 05

Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (3.62 MB, 1 trang )

<span class='text_page_counter'>(1)</span><div class='page_container' data-page=1>

<b>ANOTHER JUDGE BLOCKS US LAW </b>
<b>BANNING LATE-TERM ABORTION METHOD </b>


<i>Barbara Schoetzau </i>
<i>New York </i>


<i>07 Nov 2003, 00:34 UTC </i>


<i>A Federal Court judge in New York has blocked enforcement of the government's new ban on </i>
<i>certain late-term abortions, signed by President Bush Wednesday. </i>


Judge Michael Casey is the second federal judge to temporarily block legal enforcement of a
ban on a procedure known as partial birth abortion. Wednesday, an hour after President signed
a measure making the procedure illegal, a federal judge in the midwestern state of Nebraska
barred the government from enforcing the law in response to a lawsuit brought by four doctors
who challenged its constitutionality.


Now Judge Casey has issued a similar restraining order at the request of seven doctors and the
National Abortion Federation (NAF), which represents abortion clinics.


The ruling only applies to the plaintiffs, but NAF represents clinics, women's health centers
and physicians in 47 states. Vicki Saporta, the head of the National Abortion Federation, says
its members perform half of the abortions done in the United States.


"So the ban on the legislation is in effect throughout the country where our members are
practicing. It does not necessarily cover other providers in those same states," she said.


Anti-abortion activists say the procedure, performed in the second and third trimesters of
pregnancy, preserves the rights of unborn children. Pro-choice advocates say the new
prohibition is too broad and fails to protect women's health. Judge Casey's injunction is for 10


days. The U.S. Department of Justice issued a statement opposing the injunction and said it
would use "every resource necessary" to defend legislation banning partial birth abortion.
The U.S. Supreme Court has already ruled against a similar measure because it did not make an
exception to protect a woman's health.


In his court injunction, Judge Casey said during a hearing Thursday that even the government
made it clear that the medical community is uncertain about whether or not the procedure
banned by the new legislation put a woman's health at risk.


The abortion issue has been a source of major controversy and confrontation in the United
States since the Supreme Court first upheld the right to abortion in its landmark Roe versus
Wade decision in 1973.


</div>

<!--links-->

Tài liệu bạn tìm kiếm đã sẵn sàng tải về

Tải bản đầy đủ ngay
×