Tài liệu 963 bài essays mẫu part 36 pdf

For more material and information, please visit Tai Lieu Du Hoc at
www.tailieuduhoc.org
would prefer to live in a university dormitory, because I would closer to my classes, it
would be so much convenient for doing research after classes, and I would more easily
attend university events. There are more advantage not to living on campus. For instance,
when living off campus, the student does not have to be around twenty-four hours a day
and seven days a week. After classes, he can, thankfully, leave the university for the rest
of the day. Furthermore, when living in an apartment, the student is much closer to the
movie theatres, the shopping centers, and the restaurants. Then he can enjoy his life if he
lives in outside campus. However, there are also advantages to living in a university
dormitory. For example, the student is much closer to his classes. Moreover, if he lives
right on campus, the student will find it much easier to do research in the evening. All
that he has to do, after classes, is return to the dormitory, have a supper, have a nap, and
then head out to the university library. It would be much more difficult to do this if he
were living in an apartment in town. Finally, if he lives on campus, he will find it much
easier to attend university events and participate the student activities. Personally, I
believe that the advantages of a student's living in a university dormitory exceed the
advantages of his living in an apartment in the community. For one thing, the student
would be much closer his classes. Moreover, he would find doing research in the evening
much easier. Finally, the student could easily participate the university activities.

Essay 537 Topic 106 Methods of transportation

The transportation is well developed in my city, there are several choices to make a travel
to a place 40 miles away from my home, by train, bus, my car and the bicycle that I
bought newly. But I prefer to choose my new bicycle as a transportation means for this
travel.

Firstly, I am an environmentalist and hate to use those modern machine which is not
friendly to environment. Either train, bus or my personal car consume gasoline or other
resource which is being depleted by human beings, they will also cause the

environmental problems, such as air pollution and noise making. Bicycle is no harm to
environment and it shall be promoted for short traveling by all of us.

Secondly, it is more economic, convenient and safe for such a short traveling to those
cycling lovers like me. Cycling will be much enjoyable, because I can stop to view the
scenery whenever and wherever I would like to. Bicycle can access those places that
either train, bus or car could not reach. Furthermore, there are no parking problems and
safety would be ensured if I am careful enough. But for other transportation means, my
safety will very much depend on others.

Thirdly, I cannot only enjoy the traveling by bicycle, but also can exercise myself
physically. I worked at office and always be busy with my work, the little exercise make
me feel exhausted. So I should take this chance to exercise myself and to challenge the
my physical limit.

As above-mentioned reasons, I will try to make short traveling by bicycle as possible as I
For more material and information, please visit Tai Lieu Du Hoc at
www.tailieuduhoc.org
can, instead of those modern transportation means.

Essay 538 Topic 106 Methods of transportation

Transportation has been well developed over thousands of years. Despite of this, people
always puzzled when encountered with short distance trip. 40 miles, for instance, is till
hard to choose. Due to different transports bring various advantages and disadvantages.
There are three sort of traffic tools ideal to cope with the short distance trip, coach,
private car, and train. To be honest, I prefer train most in my point of view. In the
following discussion I will reason and provide evidences to support my opinion.

It is quite easy for average people to choose driving a car. Obviously, this is the most

convenience way to have a short trip. Even though, it still has some hidden problems.
Firstly, once you face a traffic jam you will have no idea what to do but wait. Secondly,
looking for toilet can be another big problem.

Taking coach can be the cheapest approach I suppose. Similar as driving a car, coach still
cannot avoid the fate of traffic jam. Besides, since you want to purchase a ticket, you
have to book it in advance. At same time, unlike a private car, a coach cannot stop at your
desire destination directly. In particular, if you want go to Oxford, wait a minute, you
have to stop at Coventry and Reading by sequence.

Eventually, may I introduce my favorite, train, which is the brilliant traffic tool. In the
first place, it is quiet and nice. The large seats, bright windows with marvelous view,
well-controlled air conditioning and even the convenience store can provide you
absolutely comfortable environment.

In the second place, it is fast. You only need to spend two hours on the train to travel
from Birmingham to London, and train stations always linking with underground, bus
stations and taxi stop.

Last but not least, taking the train is convenient and cheap. People always regard train as
some thing inconvenient and expensive. In fact, there is only about 10 to 15 minutes
between two trains with same destination. As well as this, if you book the seat 5 days in
advance you can have quite cheap price.

To sum up, I must admit that everyone has his taste. For people like me have no driving
license, taking a train could be a fairly good idea. Although, coach and private car have
some advantages, train would always be my first choice.

Essay 539 Topic 106 Methods of transportation

I prefer metro as my first choice

Provided I traveled from home to some other place, I would undoubtedly take metro as
For more material and information, please visit Tai Lieu Du Hoc at
www.tailieuduhoc.org
my first choice. Compared with other mass transportations, metro has its own merits
which could not be surpassed by others.

There are numerous reasons why I emphasized on my idea. However, I herein explain
some pertinent ones.

What I matter most is its high efficiency. As we see, increasingly autos are running on the
main roads of the cities. That doings cause more frequent traffic jams. Owing to that, if
you want to cover a relatively long distance in a city, it is an absolutely boring thing. For
instance, in Peking, during the rush hours of morning and afternoon, it is unlikely for you
to cover ten kilometers in an hour by a bus. However, taking a metro would successfully
solve the problem. Benefiting from no traffic jams, a metro run as an express train which
would send you home in a short time.

Secondly, metro provides us a comparatively comfortable environment. In the
underground, which functions as an excellent air-conditioner, people would feel cool in
summer and warm in winter. In addition to that, there are a number of bookstores and
grocery shops, where we can readily shopping after our whole day`s work.

Last but not least, we should not gainsay that metro also has the superiority on price. In
Peking, the single price-Three Yuan for all distances makes the metro acceptable for
mass. Personally, I consider that the price is quite reasonable for many blue-collar
workers and our college students.

Due to the mentioned reasons, which correlate with each other to generate a complete

whole that would be superior to any each of these, I can safely conclude that metro
should be the first choice for mass transportation.

Essay 540 Topic 106 Response to Topic 106

Transportation is one of the basic need of today's life. This new method of transportation
has not only reduced the distance of the places but also the precious time which was not
available in ancient times. Technology has raised the means of transportation even more
up to the skies. To travel a place or destination having a distance of 40 miles one could
have any means of transport in today's world. If we consider some of the following
means of transport we can come up with the following points: 1) Car is one of the most
popular means of transport and is usually known as "personal" cars. Many people like to
have their own means of transport and car is one of the top demand in day todays' life.
Car not only serves as a means of transport but also one feels comfortable while driving.
It not only reduces the distance but can also preserve time and can cross 40 miles in few
minutes. 2) Motorbikes are also another means of transport. Basically, this type of
transport is based on the choice of the people. Some would like to ride a motorbike just to
fulfill their desire of riding it. But traveling by motorbikes are second to travel by a car.
3) People who do not have enough money to afford a car has to travel either by a bus or
by taxi or any other means of transportation. Traveling by a bus also has an advantage for
For more material and information, please visit Tai Lieu Du Hoc at
www.tailieuduhoc.org
reaching a destination. One do not have to care any type of accidents or need to pay full
attention to abide by the traffic rules which is one of the foremost regulation of a car
driver. Therefore, a person traveling by bus may enjoy the travel and also tention-free of
any avoidable mistakes. 4) Trucks are also a means of transport but one might hardly
choose to drive a truck. Because of its' low speed and a lot of effort to drive on road is
quite difficult than any other vehicles. But one who has enough moeny to drive a truck
may buy either because of his desire to drive or one may not have any other means to
travel. In my conclusion, I would prefer driving a car. It not only serves a driver for

making him reach to his destiny but it can also serve others to reach their destination like
giving a lift to someone who is in need of it. Moreover, car not only drives 40 miles, one
can go anywhere traveling more than 40 miles. Every one will prefer those means of
transportation which will benefit them because in todays' life, transportation has become
a basic need of people.

Essay 541 Topic 107 Should higher education be available to all?

Before discussing this topic, we should consider how higher education was originally
designed. Why is not university education compulsory? What kind of study does
university provide? I believe that Studying at university ought to be available for only
those who want to academically specialize themselves in a specific field, unlike most of
today`s university students. However, why do some people believe that a college or
university education should be available to all students?

Since the number of universities has increased, universities have been plunged into
changing their function: teaching academic theory to training practical skills. That has
been the way for them to attract prospects and survive. The fact is that it is really hard for
each university to keep getting enough students. Today`s higher education just
emphasizes that it enables students to stand on a better starting point for job hunting.

Whereas, as there are some special facilities for job training at the higher education`s
level, the function of university should not be changed anymore and I think we should
reconsider how higher education should be. I really doubt how many students are purely
seeking to satisfy their academic curiosity at university.

It is pitiable that university graduates are no longer specialized intellects. Making higher
education available to all students is no more than making the phenomenon worse.

Essay 542 Topic 107 Should higher education be available to all?

This is a very flexible topic to argue upon. Both the sides have their own advantages and
disadvantages depending upon the way in which we view the situation. But I would like
to argue that a college or university education should be available to all students, rather
than to only good students. I have exemplified my argument with the following facts and
examples.

For more material and information, please visit Tai Lieu Du Hoc at
www.tailieuduhoc.org
When a child joins in an elementary school for the fundamental coaching, it does not
know the importance and wants to ignore the studies. But as it grows up, due to
competition, he or she starts to concentrate on his or her studies and starts learning
practically. Some students may be bright while the others may be feeble. Actually, most
of the students tend to pick up only late when he understands his own interested subject.

Since the students tend to learn more practical things in college, if he is devoid of such
education, then how can he identify his own talent? Also, real competition is faced by a
student in his college or university. This helps the student to tune himself to all kinds of
situations like embarrassment, happiness, anger, placidity, resentment, and kindliness
etcetera. Finally, when he finishes the education period, he can adjust to the society
easily. Only after identifying himself, the student can thrive well as a brilliant student.
Until then he will remain as a dull one only. Hence we should not decide on the basis of
his grades alone as him to be a dull student.

On the other hand, if a dull student is not given a college or university education, he is
devoid of giving an opportunity to find his area of interest and hence he will remain dull
for ever.

Hence, I conclude that a college or university education is a mandatory thing for each and
every student, whether he or she is bright or dull in his studies.

Essay 543 Topic 107 Should higher education be available to all?

The issue of who should attend college appears to be a controversial one. Some people
believe that it should be available to good students only, for it would provide the society
with excellent specialists, raise the prestige of universities and be beneficial to the
students themselves. However, after careful thought, I am inclined to support those, who
think that high education must be available to everyone, who chooses to have it.

First, the system of determining whether a student is capable or not is not perfect. Many
outstanding scientists, like Einstein, were doing extremely bad at school. It is also not
uncommon that a smart teenager is neglecting the studies because of the physiological
problems of the age.

Second, the practice of selecting the students on the basis of the school grades only,
would lead to a huge discrimination of many young people, and would deprive them a
chance to improve their lives and pursue the careers they are interested in. I believe, it is
absolutely out of the question in the modern society.

Finally, if the universities and colleges were highly selective, they would sooner or latter