Tải bản đầy đủ (.pdf) (7 trang)

Tài liệu Defining Members pptx

Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (16.84 KB, 7 trang )




< Day Day Up >

Defining Members
N
ot all class members are created equal. Using special keywords, members can be
configured in various ways, allowing you to specify how the member is accessed and the
scope of its influence. Next, we'll discuss what this means and how you can use this
functionality when creating class members.
Public and Private Members
By default, all members of a class (its properties and methods) are public. This means
that the property or methods of that class can be accessed by instances of that class. Look
again at our State class definition:

class State {

var statePopulation:Number;

function State() {

//Constructor

}

function setPopulation(num:Number) {

statePopulation = num + (num * .05);

}



function getPopulation():Number {

return statePopulation;

}

}


The members in this class, statePopulation, setPopulation(), and getPopulation(), are all
publicly accessible by instances of the class. For example, the following script:

northCarolina.statePopulation = 8000000;


shows us setting the value of statePopulation directly. As mentioned in the preceding
section, while this property is used to hold a numeric value representing the state's
population, it's better to use getter and setter methods to get and set the value, which our
class definition has been set up to do. In other words, statePopulation should be a variable
that cannot be directly accessed from outside the class definition. To make this change,
you use the private and public keywords to indicate each member's access in a class:

class State {

private var statePopulation:Number;

function State() {

//Constructor


}

public function setPopulation(num:Number) {

statePopulation = num + (num * .05);

}

public function getPopulation():Number {

return statePopulation;

}

}


statePopulation has been declared as a private member of the class. As a result, only code
within the class definition itself, such as the setPopulation() and getPopulation() methods,
can access it directly. Attempting to access it from an instance in the following way:

northCarolina.statePopulation = 8000000;


results in an error.
Any property or method can be declared private or public, as you see fit.

Why would you want to hide some members in this way? Because a robust class
definition often has many properties and methods that are used to take care of tasks

internally; they have functionality built into them that should not be exposed for use
outside the class. Let's look at a real-world example.
When most people use a computer, all they want to know is how to turn it on and off, and
how to interact with it via the keyboard and mouse. Most people aren't interested in
knowing how it works internally (information about how the hardware is sending data
through the circuits or the way the hard drive is reading and writing data—the internal
workings of the computer that are important, but that don't affect how it's used). In the
same sense, it's not necessary to open all the functionalities of a class to direct access
from an instance of that class. A class may have 10 properties and 15 methods internally
that affect how instances of that class work, but maybe only 3 or 4 methods that should
be directly referenced from an instance.
In the long run, setting member access helps prevent bugs because, as mentioned earlier,
it prevents you from scripting an object in a way that you shouldn't. If you attempt to use
an object in the wrong way (attempting to use or access a private class member that
should only be used internally, within the class), Flash displays an error and lets you
know that you need to reexamine your code.
Static Members
By default, every member of a class is duplicated within an instance whenever that
instance is created. Consider the State class example that we've used a few times in this
lesson. For every new instance of that class, a copy of the statePopulation property is
created within the instance. This makes sense because every state has its own population.
In other words, while every instance of the State class has a statePopulation property, the
value of that property may differ for each instance.
There may be circumstances, however, when you need a property that is not only
accessible by every instance of a class, but has a universal value across all instances. This
is the functionality that static properties provide.
If a property is static, it's created in memory only once. All instances of the class see the
same copy of this member. If any instance of the class edits the value of the property, all
instances of the class see the new value.
Take the following class as an example:


class Star {

static var starsInTheSky:Number = 1000000000;

function Star() {

//Constructor

}

function setTotalStars(num:Number) {

starsInTheSky = num;

}

function getTotalStars():Number {

return starsInTheSky;

}

}


The property starsInTheSky has been specified as static, and is used to store the total
number of stars that can be seen in the sky. If we were to create several instances of this
class, as follows:


var star1:Star = new Star();

var star2:Star = new Star();

var star3:Star = new Star();


referencing the starsInTheSky property from any one of these instances would result in
the same value:

star1.starsInTheSky //has a value of 1000000000

star2.starsInTheSky //has a value of 1000000000

star3.starsInTheSky //has a value of 1000000000


If a star goes supernova or another star is born, the setTotalStars() method can be
executed to change the value of starsInTheSky. When the value is changed, say to
1000000037, all Star class instances see the following new value:

star1.starsInTheSky //has a value of 1000000037

star2.starsInTheSky //has a value of 1000000037

star3.starsInTheSky //has a value of 1000000037


N
OTE

Yes, we're using code that directly accesses a property (something we told you earlier not
to do). This is done strictly to demonstrate the universality of static members.

When would this kind of functionality be useful? Imagine having a class in which each
instance has to load data from the same URL. If the URL was created as a static property
of the class, it could be changed at a later time and all of the instances would
automatically load from the new URL.
Methods can be static, too. Take a look at the following example:

class Sky {

static var starsInTheSky:Number = 1000000000;

static function setTotalStars(num:Number) {

starsInTheSky = num;

}

static function getTotalStars():Number {

return starsInTheSky;

}

}


This class has the starsInTheSky static property and two static methods—setTotalStars()
and getTotalStars().

Similar to static properties, static methods have a universal functionality. These methods
can be called from any instance to update and return the value of starsInTheSky.
An interesting aspect about static methods (and properties) is that they can be accessed
simply by referencing the class name, followed by the name of the method, such as:

Sky.setTotalStars(999999999); //One star died

var numStars:Number = Sky.getTotalStars();


In this example, we've used the class name (Sky) instead of an instance name to invoke
both the setTotalStars() and getTotalStars() methods. This makes sense due to the class-
wide functionality of static methods and properties. You've used similar syntax when
invoking methods of the Math class, which has several static methods:

Math.round();

Math.random();

Math.floor();

Math.ceil();


and so on.
N
OTE
A class method (static or not) can change the value of a static property, but a static
method cannot change the value of an instance-based property.



< Day Day Up >

×