VIETNAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, HANOI
UNIVERSITY OF LANGUAGES AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES
FACULTY OF POST-GRADUATE STUDIES
TRINH
THI
HANG
USING SOFTWARE TO IMPROVE FIRST-YEAR
ENGLISH MAJORS' PRONUNCIATION: AN ACTION
RESEARCH AT HONG DUC UNIVERSITY
SU DUNG PHAN MEM PHAT TRIEN KHA NANG PHAT
AM CHO SINH VIEN CHUYEN NGANH TIENG ANH NAM
THU
NHAT:
NGHIEN CUU HANH DONG TAI TRUONG
DAI HOC HONG DUC
M.A. Minor Program Thesis
Major: English Language Teaching Methodology
Code:
60 14 10
Supervisor: Do Tuan Minh, PhD
HANOI-2010
IV
TABLE OF CONTENT
Page
DECLARATION i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
ii
ABSTRACT iii
TABLE OF CONTENT iv
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS vii
LIST
OF DIAGRAMS, CHARTS, AND TABLES
^"'
PARTI.
INTRODUCTION I
1.
Rationale of the study 1
2.
Purposes of the study 2
3.
Research questions 2
4.
Scope of the study 3
5.
Method of the study 3
6. Significance of the study
,
3
7.
Design of
the
study 3
PART
II. DEVELOPMENT 5
CHAPTER 1. LITERATURE REVIEW
,
5
1.1. Role of pronunciation in language learning 5
1.2.
Aspects
of pronunciation teaching 6
1.2.1. Vowel sounds 7
1.2.2.
Consonant sounds 8
1.2.3. Word stress 9
1.2.4.
Sentence stress 9
1.2.5.
Rhythm
, 10
1.2.6.
Intonation
, 10
1.2.7.
Other aspects of connected speech
11
1.3. Approaches to pronunciation teaching
11
1.3.1. Explicit or Implicit
H
1.3.2.
Top-down or Bottom-up 13
1.4.
Computers-assisted
language learning (CALL) and EFL learning and
teaching 14
1.5. Roles of CALL software in EFL teaching and learning 15
1.6. Benefits of using CALL softAvarc in EFL teaching and learning 16
1.7. Limitations of CALL software in EFL learning and teaching 17
CHAPTER 2.
METHODOLOGY
: 19
2.1.
Context
of the study 19
2.2.
Arguments
for
the
use of an action
research
19
2.3.
Description of the software program 20
2.4.
Subjects
of the study 21
2.5.
Instruments
21
2.6.
Procedure
22
CHAPTER 3. DATA ANALYSIS, FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION 23
3.1.
Findings from the pretest 23
3.1.1.
English sounds 23
3.1.2. Stress 24
3.1.3.
Rhythm and thought groups 26
3.1.4. Intonation 26
3.1.5.
Linking 28
VI
3.2. The intervention 28
3.3.
Findings from the post-test 30
3.3.1.
English sounds 30
3.3.2. Stress 32
3.3.3.
Rhythm and thought groups
ii
3.3.4. Intonation 34
3.3.5.
Linldng
35
3.4. Further findings from the
teacher's obser>ation
and informal
intei-view
with students 37
PART
HI. CONCLUSION 39
1.
vSummary
39
2.
Pedagogical implication 39
3.
Limitations of the study 40
4.
Suggestions
for further research 40
REFERENCES 42
APPENDICES I
VII
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
EFL: English as a Foreign Language
NS:
Native speaker
NNS:
NOP
native speaker
IT:
Information technology
CALL: Computer-assisted language learning
CMC:
Computer mediated communication
Vlll
LIST OF DIAGRAMS, CHARTS, AND TABLES
Diagram
Diagram!
English vowels 7
Tables
Table I English consonants
8
Table 2 Students' common mistakes in producing English sounds 24
Table 3 Students' stress on important words 24
Table 4 Students' stress on corrective words 25
Table 5 Students' intonation of
statements,
yes-no questions, wh-questions,
requests
and
suggestions
27
Table 6 Students' intonation of lists 27
Table 7
Students'
performance of linking 28
Tabic 8 Aspects of pronunciation to
be integrated
in speaking
lessons
29
Table 9 Comparison of the students' pronunciation of English sounds in the
pretest and posttest 30
Table
10
Students' stress on important words 32
Table I
1
Students' stress on corrective words 32
Table 12
Students'
intonation of statements, yes-no questions, wh-questions,
polite requests
and
suggestions
34
Table
13
Students' intonation of lists 35
Table 14 Students' performance of linking 35
Charts
Chart I Rhythm and thought groups 26
Chart 2 Rhythm and thought groups 33
PART I. INTRODUCTION
1.
Rationale of the study
In the last decades, the general goals of teaching have primed the effective use of the spoken
language to establish successful communication. That is why there has been a steady growth
in the attention to the magnitude of speaking and pronunciation teaching. This fact has brought
about an emergent debate about models, goals and particularly, the methodology used for
speaking and pronunciation teaching.
A
number
of research
studies
have dealt with pronunciation
teaching
and
problems
students
face
in English pronunciation. The
research
findings have revealed that pronunciation
frequently interferes with communication. As a
matter
of fact, communication may break
down
when people
pronounce incorrectly.
Moreover,
learners
with good pronunciation are
usually
more
proficient speakers and more successful language learners than
those
with poor
pronunciation.
Since I started teaching at Hong
Due
University, I have taught speaking and pronunciation to
first-year
1-nglish
majors many times. 1 have always been trying my best to
help
my
students
pronounce better. However, I have had many frustrations because my
students
always have
many mistakes in their pronunciation.
1
have been investigating into the reasons for this, and I
have found that my students, most of whom are from rural areas in the
province,
only
learned
grammar and never focused on pronunciation at secondary school. Moreover, they did not
have much access to native speakers' pronunciation.
lor non-English majors at other departments of Hong
Due
University,
they are required to
have intelligible pronunciation. English majors at Foreign
Department,
however,
must go tar
beyond the intelligibility to the point that they should sound like or nearly like native speakers
because they will
become
teachers of English and their pronunciation will affect man\
generations to come. That is the reason why
frst-year
English
majors'
weak pronunciation has
been a matter of serious concern
amonc
us.
Due to the importance of pronunciation in language learning and the poor pronunciation of
first-year English majors at Hong
Due
university, I decided to introduce some changes into my
speaking and pronunciation course for first-year English majors with the hope to improve their
pronunciation. That
v/as
the reason why I conducted this study "Using software to improve
first-year English majors' pronunciation: An action research at Hong
Due University \
which
tried to
exploit
the software programs available in my speaking and pronunciation lessons with
an aim to improve first-year English majors' pronunciation.
2.
Purposes of the study
The purpose of this study is to improve English pronunciation for first-year English majors at
I
long
Due
University. Specifically, it has three purposes as follows:
- To
identify
students'
most common mistakes in
their
English pronunciation.
- To exploit the software program, namely Pronunciation Power as an intervention in
pronunciation
lessons
to
improve
students' pronunciation.
- To justify
Ihc
effectiveness of using pronunciation
software
in
teaching
r:nglish
pronunciation to first-year English majors.
3.
Research questions
Regarding the importance of pronunciation teaching, purpose of the research and statement of
the
problem,
this study is accomplished to find the answer to the question
^How effectively
is
software exploited to improve first-year English majors* pronunciation at Hong
Due
university?
*.
Specifically,
the study addressed the following three research questions:
• What are the students' most common problems regarding their English pronunciation?
•
Is Pronunciation
A;MCTeffective
in
teaching
first-year English majors' pronunciation?
• If
yes,
how effective is it?
4.
Scope of the study
The study concentrates on improving first-year English majors at Hong
Due
University by
using the pronunciation software named Pronunciation Power, Within its scope, the research
was aimed at justifying the effectiveness of using this software program in teaching English
pronunciation to first-year English majors at Hong Due university.
5. Methods of the study
This study is conducted as an action research because it is aimed at improving first-year
English majors' pronunciation. In
order
to get data, a combination of different instruments,
namely class observation, informal interviews and audio-recording, is used. The data
collected
from the observation and interviews will be analyzed by qualitative method, and the data
collected through the tape scripts will be analyzed by quantitative method.
6. Significance of the study
Even though
there
have been numerous studies on pronunciation teaching, few investigations
into
the use
of software in teaching pronunciation are
conducted.
This
research
provides an
insight into the effectiveness of applying pronunciation software to the teaching of
pronunciation to first-year English majors. The results of the study
will,
therefore,
be
much
beneficial to both teachers who are considering whether to exploit software programs in their
English pronunciation lessons and students who are interested in using software programs to
improve their English pronunciation.
7.
Design of the study
The study consists of three main parts as follows.
The
first part deals with rationale, purposes, research
questions,
scope, methods and design of
the study.
The second part contains three chapters, in which chapter I reviews the literature focusing on
the theoretical basis related to teaching pronunciation and using CALL programs in language
learning and teaching, chapter 2 presents a detailed description of the research methodology,
and chapter 3 discusses the findings of the study.
The final part summarizes all the main ideas expressed throughout the research, provides
pedagogical implications and suggests further research orientations.
According to Murphy
(1991),
given that most courses emphasize general oral communication
over pronunciation, teachers must seek creative ways to integrate pronunciation into speaking-
oriented classes in a manner clearly related to the oral communication goals of the course. He
also adds that pronunciation instruction
needs'
to be integrated with broader level
communicative activities in which speakers and listeners engage in meaning communication.
It is obvious in my situation as a teacher of English that students' weak pronunciation has
negative effect on their ability to express themselves and their ability to listen to
others,
especially to native speakers. Speakers with wrong pronunciation find it difficult to make
themselves understood by the teacher and other students, which makes them embarrassed and
hesitant to continue speaking. Moreover, when a learner has already stuck to the wrong way of
pronouncing a particular word, phrase or sentence, (s)he is unlikely to recognize the authentic
pronunciation by a native speaker and fail to
interpret
what the speaker
means.
Therefore, it can be concluded that pronunciation play an essential
role
in
learning
a foreign
language because it is
intelligible
pronunciation that make communication possible and
even
if
a
speaker
uses the right words with
the
right structure hut without
correct
or
inlclligibic
pronunciation, s(he) is likely to cause misunderstanding, communication interruption, or even
communication breakdown.
1.2. Aspects of pronunciation teaching
As regards what teaching pronunciation involves, Ur (1996:47) claims that "the concept
oj
''pronunciation
" may be said to include:
- the sounds of the language, or
phonology,
- stress and rhythm
- intonation.
"
Martin Hcwings in his book Pronunciation Practice Activities presents that the following
elements
should be included in the English pronunciation teaching:
- Segmental features with more focus on consonants, consonant clusters and vowel length
- Suprasegmental features consisting of word stress, tonic words, weak and strong forms,
connected speech and
tone,
(pp.15
-
16)
1.2.1. Vowel sounds
Celce-Murcia,
M., Brinton, D., and Goodwn, J,
(1996)
defines vowels as
""sounds
in which
there is continual vibration of the vocal cords and the air stream is allowed to escape from the
mouth in an obstructed
manner,
without any
interruption.'"
According to Roach
(1998),
vowels are
"'sounds
in the production of which there is no
obstruction to
the
flow of air as it passes the larynx to the
lips.''
Vowels can be classified in
terms of:
- the height of
the
bulk of
the
tongue in the mouth.
- the front/back position of
the
tongue in the mouth the degree of lip-rounding.
- the length of vowels.
The classification can be shown in
the
following diagram:
•
i:
\
•
\
clof«
1
1
tftilit^l
\
• l
e
\
•
•a.
lifLl rrn
I'
•
^
',
•"
u
3
•
u:
i
,
•
j
•
D
•
a:
1
Diagram 1. English vowels
8
1.2.2.
Consonant sounds
According to Kelly. G, (2003:24),
"'consonants
are formed by interrupting, restricting or
diverting the airflow in a variety of
ways.'"
Roach
(1998)
define consonants as ""sounds in which there is obstruction to
thejlow
of air as
it passes the larynx to the lips.
"
Consonants are classified according to:
-
the manner
of articulation
- the place of articulation
- the force of articulation
The classification of English consonants can
be
shown in the following tabic:
Table /. English consonants
;
s
1
•-•
icu
Manner
or
An
\_
1
L
. ,
Stop
hficalivc
AtTnnitc
Niis;il
lateral
Ap]iro\iinnnt
RelroHcx
Approxiiniinl
Glide
Iv.
JlCClCSS
Bilabial
P
b
m
S\
w
I'lacL'
of
Articulalion
Labio
dental
f V
.:;*^s':
Imor
dental
e
d
Alveolar
[ d
S 2
n
•!p?^l
.Alveo-
palatal
^
3
tJ rfsl
Palatal
j
Vi-h.r
k
J]
D
Siflfe orihr(;iottis
i Voiced
\
Gioital
V
h
j
!
i
•
1.2.3. Word stress
Avery and Ehrlich's
(1992)
state that word stress involves making vowels longer and louder.
Randolph Quirk and Sidney Greenbaun
(1973:450)
defines stress as the prominence with
which one part of
a
word or of
a
longer utterance is distinguished from other parts. According
to Pennington, stress has at least three prosodic features, which are duration (or length),
intensity
(or loudness) and pitch (or fundamental frequency).
Word stress is closely related to intelligibility because when a word is said with incorrect
stress pattern, the listener may spend time searching for the word in the wrong stress category.
A stress pattern mistake can, therefore, cause a great deal of confusion. That is the reason why
Kelly (2000) emphasizes that it would be practical to
base
our teaching
principle
on a two-
level division (stressed or
unstressed).
1.2.4. Sentence stress
According to Avery and Ehrlich (1992), in a particular
sentence,
one content word receives
greater stress than all others, which is referred as the major sentence stress. In most cases, the
major
sentence
stress falls on the last content word within a sentence.
However,
there are also
cases in which the major sentence stress will not fall on the final content word of the sentence.
It depends on the speakers who decide which word in their speech they want to give more or
less prominence. A word may be given less weight because it has been said already, or it may
be given
more weight because the speaker want to highlight it.
The use of incorrect stress in English can make it difficult for listeners to identify the meaning
of the sentence. Kenworthy (1987) demonstrates that there is a great deal of evidence that
native speakers rely very much on the stress pattern of words when they are
listening,
and that
when a native speaker mishears a word, it is because the foreigner has put the stress in
the
wrong place, not because he or she mispronounced the sounds of the word.
10
1.2.5,
Rhythm
Kenworthy (1987:30) claims that rhythm is a product of word stress and the way in which
important items are foregrounded through their occurrence on a strong beat, and unimportant
items are backgrounded by their occurrence on a weak beat. Dalton and Scidlhofer
(1994)
also
give the similar description of rhythm concentrating on the contrast
between
stress and
unstress, which states that ""utterances are continuous strings of syllables, the stressed
syllables provides the foreground and the unstressed ones the backgrounds.
"
English has a
stres.s-timed rhythm, in which stressed syllables recur at equal intervals of time but unstressed
syllables are unequally spaced in time. The amount of time it takes to say a sentence depends
on the
number
of syllables that receive stress, not on the total number of syllables. This should
be
distinguished
from syllable-timed rhythm like Vietnamese, in which all
the
syllables recur
at
equal intervals
of time, stressed or unstressed, so that Vietnamese students can avoid
the
interference
of their mother
tongue
in the
target
language.
1.2.6.
Intonation
According to Kelly (2000), intonation refers to the way the voice goes up and down in pitch
when wc are speaking. He also claims that
"//
is
a fundamental
part of the way we express our
o\yn
thoughts and it enables us to understand those of others.
"
Four basic tunes of English are as follows:
-
The
falling tune (the glide-down)
- The first rising tune (the
glide-up)
- The second rising tune (the
take-oft)
-The falling-rising tune.
Intonation has
the
function as
the
expression of
speaker's
altitude and purpose in
sa\ing
something
such as greeting you, telling you
something,
asking you, ordering
>ou.
pleading
11
with you or thanking you etc Intonation is therefore important for intelligibility.
Inappropriate intonation pattern can lead to misunderstanding just as mispronounced sound
can.
The importance of raising students' awareness of the uses of four basic tunes of English
in order to improve their communicative performance is therefore can not be denied.
1.2.7.
Other aspects
of
connected speech
The following aspects appear when English is spoken in casual and rapid everyday speech.
* Assimilation
According to Kelly (2000), assimilation is the modification of sounds on each other
when
they
meet, usually across word boundaries, but can
also
within words. Assimilation is said to be
progressive when a sound influences a following sound, or regressive when a sound inlluenccs
one which precedes it.
* Word linking
When
a word finishes with a consonant and is followed by another word which an initial
vowel,
the final consonant of the first word will join with the first vowel of the second
one.
* Elision
Kelly
(2000) define elision as
''the
disappearance of a sound.
In
saying an utterance,
some
sounds are deleted due to the fast speed and also due to the economy of effort, when people do
not want to try hard in pronouncing every single sound.
1.3. Ap|)roaches to pronunciation teaching
1.3.1.
Explicit or Implicit
In a summary of the application of explicit phonetic instruction in pronunciation teaching.
Derwing and Munrol (2005:388)
explain
explicit phonetic instruction as follows: 'Must as
students
learning
certain grammar points benefit from being explicitly instructed to notice the
12
difference between their productions and those of
LI
speakers, so students learning L2
pronunciation benefit from being explicitly taught phonological form to help them notice the
difference"
In a well-known study by Derwing, Munrol and Wiebe (1998), explicit instruction was given
to the experimental group and not to the control group. Both groups were evaluated before and
after the
experiment
by both trained and untrained listeners. The results
demonstrated
that
explicit phonetic instruction enhanced learners' pronunciation of the target language.
Luchini in his article "Task-Based Pronunciation Teaching: A State-of-the-art
Perspective"
argues that
""
the formal instruction of those common core features of English pronunciation
- vowel
length,
nuclear stress (especially contrastive stress), and
voice
setting - which seem to
be vital for establishing intelligibility enable learners to take utmost advantage of
both
(heir
receptive and productive pronunciation skills. "
/"p.
197)
However, not all researchers agree that formal and explicit instruction can
help students
to
improve their pronunciation.
Roach,1983;
Dalton and
Seihofcr.
1994: among others state that
numerous students can not gain all the prosodic
features
when
they
arc
overly
taught,
which
can only be implicitly learnt by long-term exposure to the target
language,
(pi95)
I myself believe that overt instruction is necessary in the speaking and pronunciation lessons,
especially for my first-year English major students at Hong
Due universitx
because they will
become teachers of English and they need to know
exactK how
a
sound,
a
word,
a
phrase,
an
utterance or a sentence is pronounced, so that they can teach their pupils in the forthcoming
luture, not just to learn pronunciation implicitly without thorough understanding of it.
However,
this does not mean that implicit learning is not important. Teachers should on the
one hand give explicit phonetic instructions and on the other hand encourage students to
continuously expose to the target language.
13
1.3.2. Top-down or Bottom-up
Pronunciation teaching consists of
2
parts: segmental (consonants, vowels and clustering) and
suprasegmental (thoughts group, prominence, intonation and syllable structure). Dalton &
Scidhofcr in their book Pronunciation identify two approaches to pronunciation teaching
including bottom-up and top-down. In bottom-up approach, the segmental features are to be
taught first, then the suprasegmentals will naturally be gained. Whereas, in the top-down
approach, the prosodic features are to be learnt before the
segments,
(pp.69-70)
According to Celce-Murcia (2001), the top-down approach, in which suprasegmental aspects
of pronunciation arc addressed first, has been the main trend in pronunciation leaching. Field
(2005:20) also states that
suprasegmentals
should be taught first in order to improve
learners'
intelligibility.
He explains that the results of numerous research have shown the
importance
of
suprasegmentals over the
segmentals.
Moreover, segmentals arc manageable because listeners
can use their lexical knowledge to
interpret
the phonemes
In
contrast to Celce-Murcia and Field, Levis (2005) claims that the mainstream
emphasis
on
suprasegmental aspects is not entirely valid because it is not based on sound research and
he
points out a segmental focus makes a more important contribution to intelligibility. Saito
(2007:20) also
emphasizes
the importance of teaching segmental prior to suprasegmental
features and argues that the communication can get through if the speakers use the wrong
prosody because the listeners can interpret what the speakers
mean,
but the speakers'
mispronunciation of
the
sounds in minimal pairs can lead to communication disruption.
Luchini
(2005:195),
however, balances these two approaches when he assumes that we should
equilibrate between
segmentals and suprasegmentals so that students can decide whether
the\
desire to be native-like speakers or not. He goes on to argue that both segmental and
suprasegmental features are important in making one's pronunciation intelligible.
In
the researcher's
intervention, she followed the bottom-up approach in which segmental
features were taught before suprasegmental ones.
14
1.4. Computers-assisted language learning (CALL) and EFL learning and teaching
During the last decades, much CALL research has explored the potential of technology as well
as
multimedia—the
combination of text, audio, video, graphics, and
animations—as
a tool to
teach and reinforce English language learning. These studies focus on justifying the
effectiveness of the application of certain technologies in specific language skill areas.
In his recent literature review and meta-analysis, Zhao (2003) identifies three problems with
assessing the
effectiveness
of technology. First is the problem of defining what counts as
technology (videos, CALL tutorials, and chat rooms, for example, are obviously very
different).
The
second
problem is separating a technology from its particular uses.
Because
any given technology may be used in a variety of ways, some effective, some not, it is difficult
to generalize about the effectiveness of a technology itself The third issue has to do with the
effects of other
mediating
factors, such as
the
learners,
the
setting,
the task(s), and
the
type of
assessment.
Zhao
attempted
to address
these
issues by performing a
meta-analysis
of
stringently selected studies published between 1997 and
2001.
Including technologies ranging
from video to speech recognition to web tutorials, Zhao found a significant main effect for
technology applications on
student
learning.
According to (Wood, 2001) and Nikolova (2002), multimedia is seen as supporting
vocabulary acquisition because it can effectively present new lexical items and enable learners
to practice them with visual
referents
and through gaming formats that include visual and
auditory information, which improve retention.
Multimedia
technology containing audio and video has also been shown to promote the
development
of listening skills (Brett, 1997. Merler. 2000), and computer mediated
communication (CMC) has also had positive effects on language acquisition (Chun, 1994;
Warschauer, 1997). Gulcan (2003), and Hagood (2003) contend that the
interpla\
of
multimedia
elements
improves learning to read a second language.
15
Stenson, Downing, Smith, & Smith
(1992)
hold the view that visual displays of language
learner speech and the opportunity to visually and aurally compare output to that of a native
speaker have been shown to improve target language pronunciation.
In short, much recent CALL research has focused on the application of CALL in language
teaching and research results have showed that CALL can be effectively employed to support
and
enhance
language acquisition. Few, however, have focused on the application of computer
software
in language
learning
and teaching. The chief aim of this study was to justify the
effectiveness of using computer software to teach English pronunciation to English major
students.
1.5. Roles of CALL software in EFL
teaching
and learning
According to Kern (2006), the role of technology in CALL can
be
thought of in terms of
"///c
metaphors of
tutor,
tool, and
mediufn\
In the
tutor role, computers can
provide
instruction,
feedback, and testing in grammar, vocabulary, writing, pronunciation, and other dimensions of
language and
culture
learning.
Voice interactive CALL can also simulate
communicative
interaction. In the tool
role,
computers provide ready access to
written,
audio, and visual
materials relevant to the language and culture being studied. They also provide reference tools
such as online dictionaries, grammar and style checkers, and concordances for corpus analysis.
The
Internet
and databases can serve as tools for research.
In
the medium role, technology
provides
sites for interpersonal communication, multimedia
publication,
distance
learning,
community participation, and identity formation.
Specifically, Barr (2004) sees the roles of CALL software as follows:
- CALL
.software
as a learning aid.
Barr (2004) states that generic and specialized computer-assisted learning software have been
used to enhance the learning capabilities of students in many areas of study, including
language learning. Similar to Kern, Barr also regards computer software as a tutor,
''adopting
the role of
the
teacher"
and as a tool to develop course materials.
16
- CALL software as a resource for reference
According to Barr, CALL software programs are available over the web which can also be
directly downloaded. This give tutors the opportunity to prepare lessons using the programs
appropriate with aims and objectives of their lessons. Similarly, students are free to browse the
web for material or use CALL packages in their own time.
Therefore, it can not be denied that information technology in general and CALL software in
particular play a positive role in language learning and teaching. In other words, IT and CALL
software enhances the process of language learning.
1.6. Benefits of using CALL
soft^varc
in EFL
teaching
and learning
As regards benefits of CALL software, Sciarone and Mcijcr
(1993,
quoted in Barr. 2004).
suggested that
""(\4LL programs
can be used for quite tedious tasks such
a\
/caching grammar
and vocabulary
acquisition''
(p33). CALL programs will
never
tire, unlike human
teachers,
and can be used repeatedly. Barr added that when
students
use CALL
packages,
the teacher
therefore
has more
time
to
devote
to preparing other types of classes, concentrating on specific
problems they may have. In addition, CALL has a certain academic value. Many modern
programs make effective use of graphics and color and recorded sound: they are therefore eye-
catching, which make students be attracted to the programs that teach tedious areas of
language learning. This view is further reinforced by Galavis
(1998),
who claimed that
"Video,
pictures,
and sound presented by computers stimulate sight and hearing simultaneously in
a
way traditional resources do
not'''
Galavis goes on to state that CALL software programs may provide considerable input and a
wide
variety of registers and accents. They ""provide access to authentic
materials".
Pacoex
(1997) also maintains that CALL software is able to offer comprehensible
input,
which is
necessary for
the
taking place of second language learning.
Hie
software utilize a multi-
sensory collection of text, sound, pictures, video, animation and even hypermedia which
provide meaningful contexts to facilitate comprehension.
17
As far as the researcher of this study is concerned, the benefits of using computer software in
EFL teaching and learning are as follows:
The first benefit for using language learning software is the great level of convenience it
provides. The software allows students to have a language expert available when they want
them to be. In other words, students can use CALL anywhere outside the classroom, in areas
of self-study.
Another major advantage is that by learning a foreign language using software, students can
develop their own autonomy by going at the pace that suits them best and choosing the most
appropriate learning styles and strategies.
CALL software can also take a load of
pressure
off students. It can be frustrating and
embarrassing to struggle learning a language in front of others that are learning it rather easily.
When students learn at
home,
there
is no pressure and no one to feel timid around while
learning.
Moreover, most of the software for language learning comes along with
interactive
audio
lessons, and even speech recognition software for pronunciation. The more advanced software
offerings
even
come provided with an interactive forum where students can interact with a
particular language professional and fellow students. All these characteristics help students to
immerse
in
authentic
materials and expose to native speakers.
It is due to these benefits of using software in language learning and teaching that the
researcher,
as a teacher of English of Foreign Language Department at Hong
Due
University.
decided to exploit the software to teach pronunciation to her first-year English majors.
1.7. Limitations of CALL software in EFL learning and teaching
Beside the precious
benefits
that CALL programs can bring to language learning and
teaching,
there reveal certain limitations that teachers should take into consideration when choosing
these programs to integrate into their lessons.
DAI HOC
QiJOC GIA
HA
NOl
TRUNG
TAM THONG TIN
THiJ
VIEN
omj (wm
18
As Graham Davies points out, in his article on history of CALL, that these programs are not
suitably spontaneous (2000). In other words, they do not yet have the ability to react to the
unforeseen. It students do not understand the mistakes they make, the help sections that many
CALL packages provide are limited by the information that the programmer has fed into the
help section database. They cannot address questions that have not been pre-programmed.
Moreover, ""it appears that CALL systems have insufficient technological capability to
recognize and respond to the human voice" (Ehsani and Knodt,
1998
quoted in Barr, 2004).
Students
cannot yet conduct a conversation in a foreign language with a computer: human
contact is required for this type of interaction. Galavis (1998) agrees on this fact when he
states that computers do not provide some important features of real communicative
exchanges as well as the sense of cooperation that can be found in class with a teacher. Lee
(2000) also stated that there is a lack of high quality software.
To a certain extent, these limitations can be reduced in a number of
way.s.
Levy
(1997:231)
argues that it is importance for language
teachers
to have a more direct
role
in the production
of CALL software, thereby, ensuring the pedagogical relevance of these programs. In addition,
all the software programs should be carefully checked before being used.
19
CHAPTER 2. METHODOLOGY
2.1.
Context of the study
The study was conducted at Hong
Due
university in Thanh Hoa province. This is a multi-
discipline university in which English is one of the majors. Students at Foreign Language
Department are trained to become teachers of English for secondary schools in Thanh Hoa.
Teachers of English training course
K12,
to which the study is targeted, is in its first year in
the academic year
2009-2010.
In
the
first
semester,
pronunciation is not designed as a separate subject but
integrated
into the
speaking course which is delivered within
15
weeks with 4 periods a week. The course book
being
used
is
""Let's
talk /
"
by
Leo
Jones,
Cambridge University Press 2002.
My
observation
at the first and second week of the
semester
showed that students made many
mistakes in their pronunciation.
I tried
to correct some of these mistakes.
Iloxsever.
students
seemed
so solidly stuck to their initial pronunciation that right after the
teacher's
feedback,
they
returned
to their mistakes. Therefore. I
decided
to provide them with proper training
using
the
software
packages
that arc vivid enough to
change
their fossilized mistakes.
2.2.
Arguments for the use of an action research
""Action research is any systematic inquiry conducted by teacher researchers to gather
information about the ways that their particular school operates, how they teach, and how
well
their students learn. The information is gathered with the goals of gaining insight,
developing reflective practice, effecting positive changes in the school
environment
and on
educational practices in general, and improving student outcomes. " (Mills, 2004:4)
According to Cohen and Manion (1985), the aim of action research is to improve the current
state of affairs within educational context in which the research is carried out.
20
Koshy (2005) also maintains that action research is a powerful and useful model for
practitioner research because research can be set within a specific context or situation and
researchers can be participants - they do not have to be distant and detached from the
situation.
The researcher, as a teacher, decided to choose action research as her methodology because
action research is classroom-based research conducted by teachers in order to
reflect
upon and
evolve their teaching. This meets the main purpose of my thesis, that is to gain understanding
of teaching and learning within my own classroom and to use that knowledge to increase my
teaching efficacy and improve my own students' pronunciation.
2.3.
Description of the software program
Pronunciation Power scries consisting of 2 CD-Roms is an interactive software program that
focuses on
developing
students'
individual sounds and basic
suprasegmental
features. I here
arc
three
areas of study for a particular sound: Lessons, Speech
Analysis,
and Exercises.
Pronunciation Power
I
contains
S.T.A.l.R.
(Stress, Timing. Articulation. Intonation and pitch.
and Rhythm) Exercises which are not
available
in Pronunciation Power 2. Audible sounds are
accompanied by visual illustrations (a side and a front view) of
real-time
articulatory
movements
for the production of the sounds. For the side view, animated drawings provide an
x-rayed look of the complete articulatory
mechanics,
including
manner
and location of
airflow, lips and tongue placement and movement, velum movement, and whether a sound is
voiced or
voiceless.
For the front view, a video clip of a real person is
shown,
demonstrating
jaw, lip, and tongue protrusion movement. A written description, and at times
suggestions,
for
prcxkicing
the sound is
provided,
which the user can access as an auditory clip. The Speech
Analysis offers the user a look at graphic representations of the sound utterance as a
waveform. The user is able to record their own production of the
sound,
and then compare
their
waveform of the sound with that of the instructor. The
waxeforms
provide information
concerning the loudness (amplitude) and pitch (frequenc>) of sounds, as well as duration
(length).