Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (167.25 KB, 7 trang )
<span class='text_page_counter'>(1)</span><div class='page_container' data-page=1>
<i><b>Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci </b></i><b>(2017)</b><i><b> 6</b></i><b>(11): 281-294 </b>
281
<b>Original Research Article </b>
<b>S. Bhaskar4, Sanjeev Kumar5 and D.V. Naveen6</b>
1
National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, Regional Centre, Hebbal,
Bangalore-560 024, Karnataka, India
2
Director of Research, Central Agricultural University, Imphal, Manipur, India
3
Department Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, UAS, Bangalore-560 065,
Karnataka, India
4
Department of Agronomy, UAS, Bangalore-560 065, Karnataka, India
5
NDRI, Karnal, India
6
Deptartment of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Sericulture College,
Chintamani, Karnataka, India
<i>*Corresponding author </i>
<i><b> </b></i> <i><b> </b></i><b>A B S T R A C T </b>
<i><b> </b></i>
<b>Introduction </b>
The total phosphorus level of soil is not only
low but also P compounds are mostly
unavailable for plant uptake. The
concentrations of phosphorus in the soil
solution (intensity) and capacity of the soil to
supply phosphorus to the soil solution are
important factors affecting P availability. As
the basic raw material rock phosphate
available in the country is only 10 per cent of
the total requirement hence, fertilizer industry
<i>International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences </i>
<i><b>ISSN: 2319-7706</b></i><b> Volume 6 Number 11 (2017) pp. 281-294 </b>
Journal homepage:
Red soils (<i>Alfisols</i>) of Karnataka are low in total and available phosphorus (P). When
<b>K e y w o r d s </b>
Fertility gradients,
Finger millet – maize
cropping system,
Graded levels of P,
Soil phosphorus
fractions.
<i><b>Accepted: </b></i>
04 September 2017
<i><b>Available Online:</b></i>
<i><b>Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci </b></i><b>(2017)</b><i><b> 6</b></i><b>(11): 281-294 </b>
282
in India is not self sufficient in meeting the
requirement of P therefore, depends on
imports for the balance of 90 per cent
(Chandrakala, 2014).
Phosphorus (P) dynamics in soil and
maintenance of its adequate supply are
important for sustainability (Song <i>et al.,</i>
2007). The application of P to each crop in a
rotation and low recovery of added P has been
found to result in its significant build up in
soils (Brar <i>et al.,</i> 2004). Application of
fertilizer phosphorus is essential for raising
the available P content in soils in order to
meet the crop requirements at different stages
of growth. The availability of soil P to plants
depends on the replenishment of labile P from
other P fractions. Nwoke <i>et al.,</i> (2004)
observed that the changes in different
inorganic-P fractions in soils under a wide
range of management conditions. The extent
of P depletion ranged from 33 to 129 per cent
over a period of 11 years (Nambiar and
Ghosh, 1984; Tandon, 1987).
Knowing the initial soil test value and
recovery of added phosphates, it will be
possible to work out the amount of fertilizer
phosphorus needed to build-up the soil
phosphate to a given critical limit. Soil based
P management relies on maintenance of
adequate soil P fertility and replenishment of
P nutrient removed by harvested grain.
However, there is a need to know the effect of
P addition and distribution in soils of different
P status for sustained P management and
improved PUE in the region. In the light of
the above facts, a field experiment was
undertaken involving gradient creation
followed by response of finger millet
(<i>Eleusine coracana </i>L.) - maize (<i>Zea mays</i> L.),
are the major crops cultivated in Karnataka
among millets and cereals, respectively.
The objective of the investigation is to assess
the availability of phosphorus and their
different fractions in soils of different
phosphorus fertility gradients applied with
graded levels of P to finger millet- maize
cropping system.
<b>Materials and Methods </b>
The field experiment comprised of two stages.
The experiment was conducted during
2009-2010 at D-16 Block, Zonal Agricultural
Research Station (ZARS), GKVK, UAS,
Bengaluru which is located in Eastern Dry
Zone of Karnataka at latitude of 12058' N and
longitude of 75035' E with an altitude of 930
m above mean sea level.
<b>Soil characteristics of experiment site </b>
Surface soil (0-15 cm) was analyzed for
physical and chemical properties and also
determined phosphorus fractions by adopting
standard procedures. Soils are reddish brown
laterite derived from gneiss under subtropical
semiarid climate. The soil of experimental site
was red sandy clay loam in texture, acidic in
reaction, low in available nitrogen (203.84 kg
ha-1) and phosphorus (18.42 kg ha-1) and
medium in available potassium (147.12 kg
ha-1) content (Table 1).
<b>Experimental details </b>
<b>Creation of fertility gradient strips </b>
Five equal strips (45 × 8.2 m2) were created in
one and the same field and named very low
(VL), low (L), medium (M), high (H) and
very high (VH) gradient strips as P0, P1, P2, P3
and P4, respectively. Graded doses of
<i><b>Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci </b></i><b>(2017)</b><i><b> 6</b></i><b>(11): 281-294 </b>
283
per cent each so as to achieve Very low (<15
kg P2O5 ha-1), Low (16-30 kg P2O5 ha-1),
Medium (31- 45 kg P2O5 ha-1), High (46 - 60
kg P2O5 ha-1) and Very high (> 60 kg P2O5
ha-1) P levels in the respective strips.
Exhaustive crop fodder maize (South African
tall) was grown provided with recommended
doses of nitrogen (100 kg ha-1), phosphorus
(50 kg P2O5 ha-1) and potassium (25 kg K2O
ha-1) and green fodder was harvested at 60
days after sowing. Soils in each strip analyzed
for available nutrients status. Available P2O5
content obtained in P0, P1, P2, P3 and P4,was
14.82, 27.37, 38.76, 52.25, 80.72 kg ha-1,
respectively.
<b>Studies on the changes in soil P and </b>
<b>different P fractions </b>
After harvest of exhaustive crop, each strip
was divided in to three replications and
further each replication was sub divided in to
seven treatment plots of equal size. Finger
millet (GPU-28) was grown (spacing: 20 x 10
cm) during summer followed by maize
(Nithyashree Hybrid) was grown (spacing: 60
x 30 cm) during <i>kharif</i> 2011 by imposing
treatments in a factorial RCBD design.
Treatment details as follows; T1: Absolute
control; T2: Package of Practice
(NPK+FYM); T3: 100 % Rec. N, P &K only
(no FYM); T4: 75 % Rec. P + rec. dose of
N&K (no FYM); T5: 75 % Rec. P + Rec. dose
of N&K only+ Rec. FYM; T6: 125 % Rec. P
+ Rec. dose of N&K (no FYM); T7: 125 %
Rec. P + Rec. dose of N&K + Rec. FYM.
whereas for maize 100-50-25 kg N-P2O5-K2O
ha-1 was given. Recommended dose of FYM
given was 7.5 t ha-1.
<b>Soil sampling and analysis</b>
After the harvest of maize in a finger
millet-maize cropping system, The representative
soil samples were collected at 0-15 cm depth
from all the plots separately, which were
analyzed for available P and their fractions as
per the standard procedures as follows.
Total phosphorus was estimated by
vanado-molybdo phosphoric yellow colour method
(Hesse, 1971). Organic phosphorus was
determined by deducting the sum of total
inorganic phosphorus from total phosphorus
as suggested by Mehta <i>et al., </i> (1954). The
available phosphorus was extracted using
Bray’s No.1 extractant for the soils having pH
less than 6.5 and Olsen’s extractant for the
soils having pH 6.5 and above. The extracted
phosphorus was estimated by chloro-stannous
reduced molybdo-phosphoric blue colour
method (Jackson, 1973).
The method outlined by Peterson and Corey
(1966) was followed to fractionate soil
inorganic phosphorus. Saloid-P was estimated
by molybdo-sulphuric acid reagent, using
stannous chloride as reductant. Aluminium
phosphorus (Al-P) determined by
molybdic-boric acid reagent and
chloro-stannous reductant using the soil residue left
after saloid-P estimation. The soil sediment
from Al-P estimation, was then used to
determine iron phosphorus (Fe-P) by
molybdic-boric acid reagent and
chloro-stannous reductant.
<i><b>Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci </b></i><b>(2017)</b><i><b> 6</b></i><b>(11): 281-294 </b>
284
<b>Data computation</b>
The experimental data were analyzed using
ANOVA (One-Way). Critical differences
among treatments were estimated at 5 %
probability level of significance. Correlation
studies were made and the values of
correlation coefficient (r) were calculated and
tested for their significance (Panse and
Sukhatme, 1967).
<b>Results and Discussion </b>
Data presented in Table 2 to 6 depicted
changes in phosphorus fractions after harvest
of maize in a finger millet-maize cropping
system which showed significant differences
among mean values of P gradients, treatments
and their interaction.
<b>Fertility gradients effect</b>
There was an increase in, total-P (Table 2),
organic-P (Table 3), RS-P (Table 5),
occluded-P (Table 6) and Ca-P (Table 6)
fractions with the increased fertility gradient
strips from very low to very high strip. This
might be due to application of P in the
increasing dose in order to create fertility
gradients. Enrichment of the total and
available P (Fig. 1) status as the PUE (Table
8) by the crops was 20-40 per cent only in
general. There was a positive correlation
exists (Table 7a) between T-P and Org-P,
RS-P, Occl-P and Ca-P fractions (0.997*, 0.999*,
0.974* and 0.992*, respectively). There were
also recorded increased Org-P, RS-P, Occl-P
and Ca-P fractions with the increased T-P
content of soil.
Unlike T-P, org-P, RS-P, occl-P and Ca-P
fractions, S-P (Table 3), Al-P (Table 4) and
fractions were higher in very low and low
gradient strips, might be due to acidic soil pH
resulting in transformation of added P in to
Al-P and Fe-P fractions. Majumdhar <i>et al.,</i>
(2007) observed that the contribution of
Org-P to T-Org-P was 48.90 to 53.70 per cent. They
also noticed significant increase in S-P, Al-P,
Fe-P and Ca-P but decrease in
reductant-soluble and occluded-P fractions. Setia and
Sharma (2007) observed that application of P
@ 17.50 or 35 kg P ha-1 increased all the
forms of P in 22 years of maize-wheat cycles.
The relative abundance of P fractions was in
the order of saloid-P < Fe-P < Al-P < Ca-P.
Jakasaniya and Trivedi (2004) also noticed
that the increase in S-P, Al-P, Fe-P and Ca-P
fractions with increase in rate of P addition in
different soils. Org-P showed a buildup due to
sorghum cropping in all soils.
<b>Treatments effect</b>
Application of graded levels of P with
gradient strips had direct relationship with
<i><b>Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci </b></i><b>(2017)</b><i><b> 6</b></i><b>(11): 281-294 </b>
285
comparison to their initial concentration.
Sukhvir Kaur (2015) reported that the
application of integrated fertilizers recorded
significantly higher Sa-P concentration
compared to inorganic only.
<b>Fig.1</b> AvP2O5 in soils of different P fertility strips as influenced by graded levels of applied P
<b>Table.1 </b>Initial soil properties of experimental site
<b>Parameters </b> <b>Values </b>
Coarse sand (%) 33.2
Fine sand (%) 36.3
Silt (%) 7.5
Clay (%) 23.0
Textural Class Sandy Clay loam
CEC [c mol (p+) kg-1] 11.10
pH (1:2.5) 5.55
EC (dS m-1) 0.26
Organic Carbon (%) 0.45
Available N (kg ha-1) 203.84
Available P2O5 (kg ha
-1
) 18.4
Available K2O (kg ha
-1
) 147.1
Exchangeable Ca [c mol (p+) kg-1] 6.75
Exchangeable Mg [c mol (p+) kg-1] 3.60
Avail. S (mg kg-1) 10.82
DTPA-Fe (mg kg-1) 55.8
DTPA-Mn (mg kg-1) 59.5
DTPA-Cu (mg kg-1) 2.21
DTPA-Zn (mg kg-1) 2.35
B (mg kg-1) 0.54
Phosphorus fractions
Total P (mg kg-1) 1115.0
Saloid–P(mg kg-1) 48.70
Al-P (mg kg-1) 70.52
Fe-P (mg kg-1) 135.66
Reductant soluble-P (mg kg-1) 146.85
Occluded-P (mg kg-1) 11.07
Calcium-P (mg kg-1) 10.53
<i><b>Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci </b></i><b>(2017)</b><i><b> 6</b></i><b>(11): 281-294 </b>
286
<b>Table.2 </b>Changes in total soil phosphorus fraction (Total P) after harvest of maize
<b>P levels/Treatments </b>
<b>Total- P(mg kg-1) </b>
<b>P0</b> <b>P1</b> <b>P2</b> <b>P3</b> <b>P4</b> <b>Mean </b>
<b>T1</b> 726.33 1086.50 1113.33 1331.67 1517.92 <b>1155.15 </b>
<b>T2</b> 1288.67 1543.67 1676.67 1724.67 1810.83 <b>1608.90 </b>
<b>T3</b> 1033.33 1220.83 1337.67 1430.42 1563.08 <b>1317.07 </b>
<b>T4</b> 959.00 1198.17 1247.75 1436.25 1501.58 <b>1268.55 </b>
<b>T5</b> 1121.33 1308.75 1403.75 1538.00 1757.58 <b>1425.88 </b>
<b>T6</b> 1075.33 1431.00 1533.67 1694.17 1797.07 <b>1506.25 </b>
<b>T7</b> 1381.00 1619.00 1701.33 1890.33 1989.75 <b>1716.28 </b>
<b>Mean </b> <b>1083.57 </b> <b>1343.99 </b> <b>1430.60 </b> <b>1577.93 </b> <b>1705.40 </b> <b>1428.30 </b>
<b>F </b> <i><b>S.Em± </b></i> <b>CD</b><i><b> (p=0.05)</b></i> <b>CV </b>
<b>P </b> S 37.06 104.58
11.89
<b>T </b> S 43.85 123.74
<b>P x T </b> NS - -
T1: Absolute control P0: Very low Phosphorus fertility strip
T2: Package of Practice (rec. NPK+FYM) P1: Low Phosphorus fertility strip
T3: 100 per cent rec. N, P & K (no FYM) P2: Medium Phosphorus fertility strip
T4: 75 per cent rec. P + rec. N&K (no FYM) P3: High Phosphorus fertility strip
T5: 75 per cent rec. P + rec. N&K+ rec. FYM P4: Very high Phosphorus fertility strip
T6: 125 per cent rec. P + rec. N&K (no FYM)
<i><b>Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci </b></i><b>(2017)</b><i><b> 6</b></i><b>(11): 281-294 </b>
287
<b>Table.3 </b>Changes in organic and saloid soil phosphorus fractions (mg kg-1) after harvest of maize
<b>P levels/ </b>
<b>Treatments </b>
<b>Org-P </b> <b>S- P </b>
<b>P0</b> <b>P1</b> <b>P2</b> <b>P3</b> <b>P4</b> <b>Mean </b> <b>P0</b> <b>P1</b> <b>P2</b> <b>P3</b> <b>P4</b> <b>Mean </b>
<b>T1</b> 425.91 646.00 674.71 889.70 1066.52 <b>740.57 </b> 47.98 53.81 50.73 39.27 36.07 <b>45.57 </b>
<b>T2</b> 691.64 924.07 1105.90 1132.47 1197.97 <b>1010.41 </b> 84.07 89.25 54.03 44.60 43.67 <b>63.12 </b>
<b>T3</b> 418.03 614.30 758.43 864.18 971.38 <b>725.26 </b> 64.82 72.49 49.73 40.23 34.00 <b>52.25 </b>
<b>T4</b> 415.16 614.73 725.73 921.25 1065.17 <b>748.41 </b> 64.14 77.59 48.43 41.09 36.28 <b>53.51 </b>
<b>T5</b> 593.89 722.71 879.12 1020.05 1230.28 <b>889.21 </b> 70.73 81.77 55.61 52.89 47.96 <b>61.79 </b>
<b>T6</b> 466.37 792.52 933.56 1089.97 1160.29 <b>888.54 </b> 50.20 66.47 38.95 39.55 37.93 <b>46.62 </b>
<b>T7</b> 706.63 969.11 1141.60 1318.74 1417.07 <b>1110.63 </b> 85.84 90.52 45.74 42.21 35.73 <b>60.01 </b>
<b>Mean </b> <b>531.09 </b> <b>754.78 </b> <b>888.43 </b> <b>1033.77 </b> <b>1158.38 </b> <b>873.29 </b> <b>66.83 </b> <b>75.99 </b> <b>49.03 </b> <b>42.83 </b> <b>38.81 </b> <b>54.70 </b>
<b>F </b> <i><b>S.Em± </b></i> <b>CD </b><i><b>(p=0.05) </b></i> <b>CV </b> <b>F </b> <i><b>S.Em± </b></i> <b>CD </b><i><b>(p=0.05) </b></i> <b>CV </b>
<b>P </b> S 12.74 35.96
6.68
S 1.92 5.42
16.11
<b>T </b> S 15.08 42.55 S 2.27 6.42
<b>P x T </b> S 33.72 95.15 S 5.08 14.35
T1: Absolute control P0: Very low Phosphorus fertility strip
T2: Package of Practice (rec. NPK+FYM) P1: Low Phosphorus fertility strip
T3: 100 per cent rec. N, P & K (no FYM) P2: Medium Phosphorus fertility strip
T4: 75 per cent rec. P + rec. N&K (no FYM) P3: High Phosphorus fertility strip
T5: 75 per cent rec. P + rec. N&K+ rec. FYM P4: Very high Phosphorus fertility strip
T6: 125 per cent rec. P + rec. N&K (no FYM)