Tải bản đầy đủ (.pdf) (17 trang)

How human resources management relates to employee engagement and leadership practices

Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (425.11 KB, 17 trang )

Assignment 2

Group Report

Subject code

BUSM3310

Subject name

Human Resource Management

Student name & ID

Lecturer

Mr. Alex Arokiasamy

We declare that in submitting all work for this assessment we have read, understood and
agreed to the content and expectations of the Assessment declaration.


Table of Content
Executive summary
I.
II.

Introduction
Analysis
1. How Human Resources Management relates to Employee Engagement and Leadership
Practices


2. Employee Engagement
3. Leadership Practices

III.

Recommendations

IV.

Conclusion

References
Appendices


Executive Summary
This essay discusses the Swiss conglomerate Kuehne & Nagel (K+N). K+N offers a
comprehensive range of specialised logistics services. As a globally recognised company, K+N is
cognizant of two changes: leadership and employee dedication to their jobs.
Thus, two critical questions arise: how performance is measured in workforce engagement
and how strong leadership is retained to guide prospective workers. This essay aims to explore how
staff influence employee commitment and management practices.
We then make some practical adjustments to enhance the efficiency of our work. Additionally,
this post discusses how leadership has changed in recent years and makes some recommendations to
help executives and workers fit into their jobs.
The first half of the book examines the relationship between employee engagement and
workplace leadership. Employee commitment: EE's physical dimension is mainly concerned with
people's physical energies, their feelings towards each of those three dimensions, and their attitudes
toward the organisation and its members. The emotional component affects people's physical power.
There are, still, several issues.

The second half examines how leaders affect employees' moral expectations to improve their
overall performance. Leaders are responsible for employee retention, management, and assignment,
while administrators decide if employees stay with the company. Human resources must provide
preparation programmes to identify and cultivate prospective leaders.
We use psychological techniques to ensure the staff' productivity during the decision-making
process. Additionally, the chief should serve as the ship's captain, in charge of his staff's enjoyment.
Not only are jobs like K+N motivated, but they are often faced with increased obstacles during their
tenure. We campaign for K+N to expand its leadership workshops to overcome language barriers.
Additionally, each of these services will shield front-line employees from the top CEO. Following
that, the fundamental analysis will be concluded.


1. Introduction

Recognized as the world's largest logistics company, Kuehne+Nagel gains its reputation from creative
and vertically integrated logistics networks as well as innovative storage centres. Founded by August
Kuehne & Friedrich Nagel in 1890 in Bremen, Germany, the company has been developing
continuously for the last 130 years, from a local shipping business to a multinational freight
forwarding corporation (Kuehne+Nagel 2021). Acknowledging the global impact it has created,
Kuehne+Nagel always values the welfare of society as a whole by staying sustainable, putting
customers first and appreciating their employees. Kuehne+Nagel accentuate that colleagues are the
primary source of inspiration for the company. Therefore, with over 72,000 supply chain professionals
working in 109 counties, Kuehne+Nagel is eager to build for them a beneficial working environment
that ensures their satisfaction and happiness.
Recently, Ms.Doan Le Minh Ha, General Manager of Human Resources & Administration at KuehneNagel, granted us a glimpse of the company's management system. Throughout the session, Ms.Ha
discussed how Kuehne+Nagel had accomplished numerous achievements in the international logistics
industry through active recruiting, expansion, and management of its human capital. Human resources
management (HRM) developed to serve as a central repository for all appropriate corporate and
employee relations procedures, regulations, and decision-making (Aquinas 2009). Additionally,
systematic utilization, appraisal, and improvement of human capital ensure the long-term growth and

profitability of the company (Gilmore & Williams 2013). Furthermore, HRM understands as a
practice that directly impacts company advantages and turns them into a vehicle for protecting
companies and maintaining smooth and productive operations (Jabbour et al., 2012).
This paper will focus on the role of two vital aspects of HRM, Employee Engagement (EE) and
Leadership Practice, within the context of Kuehne+Nagel. The following sections will analyze indepth how the two aspects relate to and affect the performance of HRM, regarding the advantages
along with appliances as well as the challenges that Kuehne+Nagel has to overcome. For those
reasons, practical recommendations will be given to suggest a future development for the company’s
HRM.

2. Analysis
1. How Human Resources Management relates to Employee Engagement and Leadership
Practices


According to Alan (2020), HRM practices and systems both positively affected the EE factor. The
three HRM practices of career advancement, job security, and performance feedback, were noticed to
have a close and beneficial relationship to EE, and were moderated by perceived organizational
support (POS) (Aktar & Pangil 2017). When POS is high, the relationship between EE and the three
practices is firm. Moreover, there are no small or large companies that can develop and win in the
long-term without energized and talented employees who are very loyal to companies and understand
how to help the organization achieve its goal (Jack & Suzy n.d.)
In terms of leadership management, HRM plays a vital role in all organizations’ management. HRM
has to attract well trained, talented, skilful leaders who can create relationships or connections among
team members, and have the ability to solve problems and unexpected issues to achieve the
organization’s goals (Amadi 2018). As Davenport (2015) stated, the organization can apply
commendation assessments to motivate, keep the leader’s spirit, and the employees’ loyalty to achieve
the common goal.

2. Employee Engagement


The progress of recent industrialization forces worldwide organizations to pay more concerns
in HRM (Albrech 2011), especially with EE since it relates to the retention of talent, the
avoidance of employee turnover, employee value addition, growth, and the survival of
organizations (Albdour & Altarawneh, cited in Tepayakul & Rinthaisong 2018). Moreover,
Hooi (2019) admits that EE is becoming more critical and a significant driver of a company’s
strategy to attain sustainable competitive advantage. Therefore, the employers or managerial
levels should concentrate more on EE to ensure an efficient and productive workforce
(Markos 2010).
Throughout the past few decades, there was plenty of research about EE theories and
practices, but many authors admitted that its definition is vast and unclear (Macey &
Schneider 2008; Hooi 2019; Markos 2010; Tepayakul & Rinthaisong 2018; Masson et al.
2015). In addition, Saks and Gruman (2014) argued that the EE concept is relatively new
because most related literature was published around the 2010s. However, despite having
various definitions, most of them are inspired by an article from the last century, which Kahn
(1990, p. 649) defines EE as 'the harnessing of organization members' selves to their work
roles; in engagement, people employ and express themselves physically, cognitively, and


emotionally during role performances. Specifically, the physical aspect of EE concerns the
physical energies exerted by individuals to accomplish their roles, the emotional aspect
concerns how employees feel about each of those three factors and whether they have
positive or negative attitudes toward the organization and its leaders, and the cognitive aspect
concerns employees' beliefs about the organization, its leaders and working conditions (Kular
et al. 2008).
According to Bridger (2014, p. 22), engagement in HRM is the main component to have
positive business performance and outcomes as it not only increases profits, productivity,
innovation, beneficial discretionary effort, customer satisfaction, and customer retention but
also reduces staff absence, voluntary turnover, sabotage, and a range of other negative
behaviours. In fact, a study found that companies with a highly engaged workforce can
strengthen operating income and net income by 19.2% and 13.7%, respectively, while low

engagement companies suffered more than 30% loss in operating income and a 3.8% decline
in net income with the same period (Wyatt, cited in Bridger 2014).
However, there are barriers for organizations to maintain efficient EE management.
According to Ms.Ha, remaining low turnover rate and ensuring employee loyalty are the most
significant challenges for HRM. Following the study of Kahn (1990), this state can be
recognized as ‘disengagement’, which might cause numerous harmful outcomes for different
levels, including organizational level, group level, and individual level, as in Figure 1.
Besides, it also leads to continuous conflicts between internal stakeholders like managers and
subordinates due to the unproductive results of the company. Hence, the employee would feel
that they are not respected or cannot see their value within the organization, and they would
likely resign from that firm.

3. Leadership Practices

·

Importance of leadership

Leadership is one of the key elements determining the success and failure of an organization (Khajeh
2018). Generally, a leader's role can be defined as the leadership process that affects team members to
achieve an organization's common goal (Rao 2010). In the 21st century, a leader has a significant
influence on the organization's performance. A good leader will create bonding relationships with


employees, adapt and respond quickly to challenges, and guide the employees in the same pathway to
a future development vision (Nanjundeswaraswamy, Swamy 2015).
Successful leaders in this current circumstance often bring positive energy, motivation, and valuable
knowledge to employees and their company (Jones 2015). A study by Alblooshi, Shamsuzzaman, and
Haridy (2020) stated that several different leadership styles directly and indirectly impact an
organization's ability to innovate. And using an effective and forceful HRM can increase its

development ability and enhance leadership nature (Gond, Swaen, and Akremi 2011). There is also
growing evidence that HR plays a vital role in recruiting and managing human resources to influence
the level of efficiency in an organization (Kepha et al., 2014). Therefore, numerous organizations tend
to recruit qualified human resources to increase their work efficiency and maintain their competitive
ability. The human resources department needs to offer advanced training programs to develop
leadership talent in the workforce.
·

FDI + managing expats:

Since the Doi Moi era in 1986, Vietnam has witnessed a momentous transformation from one of the
poorest countries in the world into a middle-income country with a vision of economic prosperity
(The World Bank 2021). The vigorous economic growth, and the excellent context of national
security, and domestic stability are the main factors for Vietnam to attract foreign direct investment
(Hong 2009). As a result, many multinational companies (MNCs / MNE) have chosen Vietnam as a
viable investment destination to expand their business, and these activities have strong momentum. In
addition, multinational organizations that can be known as multicultural organizations and human
resources management are about managing the local force and dealing with and managing expats
from many different cultures. According to Hassi & Storti (2011), globalization has a substantial
impact on training practices abroad, while operating in culturally diverse environments is challenging
for HRM / HRM practitioners. Expats believe their contribution increases organizational growth, and
the results of the analysis show that managing expats is much more complicated than domestic force
(Papadopoulos & Ezziane 2020). Furthermore, Ms.Doan Le Minh Ha determined that leadership in
KN requires a flexible ability to adapt to change in the MNC environment.
·

Cultural context

According to Kim, Pan & Park (1998), Eastern nations such as China and South Korea represent highcontext cultures, whilst a Western nation like the United States represents low-context culture. A
MNC like K+N can be seen as a model that increases the viability of cultural diversity due to different

cultural conflicts of character and attitudes, which can have either positive or negative impact on
workplace productivity. Due to cultural diversity, the ability to communicate within the MNC can be


constrained by personality and attitude conflicts. Hence, leaders should be passionate about their
goals, improve cross-cultural managing knowledge to connect and inspire employees to achieve their
goals (Florea & Manea 2016). In case the practice of leadership is not executed properly, manager's
behaviour may lead to employees’ resignation. Usage of pressure attached to the appeal of the leader
has an inverse effect on the employee's ability to voluntarily. Henceforth, bonding with employees is
an intermediary mechanism to increase employee satisfaction with the job (Reina, Roger & Peterson
2017).

3. Recommendations
1. Employee Engagement

The lack of such a vital aspect like EE at the workplace can lead to burdensome issues, and
most concerning of all is the high turnover rate, which the manager of Kuehne+Nagel
mentioned. A research about EE in the workplace was conducted by Osborne and Hammoud
(2017) to investigate constructive strategies from successful leaders to engage their
employees. The research resulted in three practical recommendations: rewards & recognition,
empowering employees and building a solid relationship between leaders and employees.
According to Biswas (2010), rewards and recognition can be utilized as a psychological
instrument to measure job satisfaction, as it is employees’ fundamental need to require
intrinsic rewards and being appreciated in the workplace (Haines and St-Onge 2012).
Rewards and recognition are means to encourage employees, and, thus, it helps reinforcing
work performance, and employees are more willing to engage for a harmonious working
environment (Brown 2011). In addition, there are numerous methods to express appreciation
and gratitude towards employees, which are much simple, such as giving thankyou notes,
organization products, vouchers and gifts, or even non-monetary ways like publishing
employee as “person of the month” on the company’s newsletter or the “wall of fame” (Rai et

al 2018). In reality, Kuehne+Nagel is applying this system through incentive and promotion,
as mentioned by the guest speaker. However, small rewards and recognition along the way
like gifts and vouchers or compliments and appreciation can be the deciding factor.
Ms.Ha mentioned very specifically that the company focuses tremendously on helping
employees to have the opportunity to grow in their career path. Kuehne+Nagel created a
development program called “Learning at KN” and successfully delivered 302,402 completed


training sessions in 2018 (figure 2) (Kuehne+Nagel 2018). The program is classified into
different targeted groups to focus on specific skill requirements and improve employees’
flexibility and mobility. Additionally, Kuehne+Nagel has invested strongly in online
platforms with 230,000 online training sessions compared to 72,00 live training sessions,
which is an enormous advantage during the pandemic situation. Enhancing employee’s
opportunities through development in “corporate culture awareness, team skills development,
incentives, and communication” can be critical factors in performance and EE (Hynes 2012).
A recommendation is that we should help the employees not only through those programs but
also to give them the challenges to overcome throughout their working period. According to
the research of Osborne & Hammoud (2017), the interviewed participants are drawn to be
challenged in their professions so they can work at a higher level and earn their leader’s trust.
Last but not least, a bonding relationship between leaders and their subordinates is essential
in a successful EE strategy. Leaders hold great responsibility in directing social interactions
and leading people towards a common goal, and, thus, are the primary source of influence
and motivation in the workplace (Skansi 2000). Building a solid relationship between an
employee and leader can lead to a healthy team environment and increase productivity.
According to Ms.Ha, to reduce the gap between generations, Kuehne+Nagel has developed
intimate sections for bonding and experience sharing, which is a sensible method to cherish
the age difference within the workplace. Kuehne+Nagel can also utilize this method into the
relationship between leaders and employees. This will be an effective way to bond the two
together and help solve many issues in work performances as well as EE.


2. Leadership Practices:

Leadership, if practised effectively, will lead employees into blossoming development with proper
vision and direction (Souba 2011). To achieve the desired level of leadership practice, it is vital to
ensure that the leaders receive proper training and developing programs from the first place.
Kuehne+Nagel believes that top managers should have a broad-minded vision and the flexibility to
adapt to all situations. Thus, similar to “Learning at KN”, Kuehne+Nagel built a talent program that
reaches to managers of the company nationally, regionally, and globally (Kuehne+Nagel 2019). These
series of leadership training programs are designed to serve the divergent levels of leaders from team
managers to top managers, which are classified into Launch, Rise, and Transform stages. These
programs concentrate on strengthening the employees’ skills and preparing them for a potentially


higher management role. As a multinational company, it could be helpful to add the element of
cultural diversity into its many talent programs. Cultural diversity, including language barriers and
cultural differences within the workforce, can contribute to hardship in management and lead to an
ineffective organization (Uzun and Sevinc 2015, Etherton-Beer et al. 2013, Baldassar et al. 2017,
cited in du Toit et al. 2020). Kuehne+Nagel can raise awareness of cultural diversity and practice
empathy for cultural preferences for future leaders through learning as well as cultural events that
bring practical experiences (Mikelyte & Milne 2016).

4. Conclusion

Overall, the paper has conducted analysis on the two factors of EE and leadership practices within the
management system of K+N. EE is one of the key determinants to one organization’s success, which
is measured by the work efficiency of the human resources department. However, it was shown from
the research that issues such as high rate turnover and lack of motivation still remain within the
system of K+N. Hence, it is recommended for K+N to conduct in-depth understanding about its
employees to empower and encourage them to enhance their dedication and motivation to work. On
the other hand, K+N seems to perform well in developing the element of leadership. The organization

has a duty to keep implementing adequate leadership training and development programs, and add in
the feature of cultural diversity that has a significant impact on the multinational context. Such
appropriate utilization of EE and leadership practices can assist and contribute monumentally to the
expansion of K+N on its future path.


References
Aquinas, PG

2009, Human Resource Management - Principles and Practice, Vikas Publishing

House, Jangpura, New Delhi.
Aquinas, PG

2009, Human Resource Management - Principles and Practice, Vikas Publishing

House, Jangpura, New Delhi.
Gilmore, S & Williams, S 2013, Human Resource Management, 2nd edn, Oxford University Press,
Oxford, United Kingdom.
Jabbour, CJC, Jabbour, ABL, Teixeira, AA & Freitas, WRS 2012, 'Environmental development in
Brazilian companies: The role of human resource management', Environmental Development, vol. 3,
pp. 137-147, Elsevier ScienceDirect database.Aktar, A & Pangil, F 2017, 'The Relationship between
Employee Engagement, HRM practices and Perceived Organizational Support: Evidence from
Banking Employees', International Journal of Human Resource Studies, studies 7, no. 3.
Alan, S 2020, 'Caring human resources management and employee engagement', Sciencedirect
Journals & Books.
Robert, V n.d., 'Employee Engagement and Commitment', SHRM Foundation, n.d., viewed 22 April
2021,< />Amadi, RC 2018, ‘Leadership in Human Resources Management’, RSU PGD 2018 Human Resources
Management 2nd Semester Presentation, Port Harcourt, September 2018, viewed 24 April 2021,
< />nt>.

Davenport, TO 2015, ‘How HR plays its role in leadership development’, Strategic HR Review, vol.
14, no. 3, pp. 89-93, viewed 25 April 2021, Emerald database.
Kuehne + Nagel 2021, ‘About us’, Kuehne + Nagel, viewed 1 May 2021, < >
Biswas, S 2010, ‘Relationship between psychological climate and turnover intentions and its impact
on organizational effectiveness: a study in Indian organizations’, IIMB Management Review, vol. 22,
no. 3, pp. 102-110, viewed 24 April 2021.
Brown 2011,’An examination of management practices as predictors of employee work engagement’,
Master of Science Thesis, San Jose State University.


Haines, V, & St-Onge, S 2012, ‘Performance management effectiveness: practices or context?’,
International Journal of Human Resource Management, vol.23, no.6, pp.1158–1175, <
>.
Hynes, G 2012, ‘Improving Employees’ Interpersonal Communication Competencies: A Qualitative
Study’, Business Communication Quarterly, vol.75, no. 4, pp. 466–475, viewed 28 April 2021, <
>.
Kuehne + Nagel 2018. ‘Continuous Learning and Knowledge’, Kuehne + Nagel, viewed 27 April
2021,< >.
Osborne, S & Hammoud, M 2017,

‘Effective Employee Engagement in the Workplace’,

International Journal of Applied Management and Technology, vol.16, no.1, viewed 23 April 2021, <
>.
Rai, A, Ghosh, P, Chauhan, R, & Singh, R 2018, ‘Improving in-role and extra-role performances with
rewards and recognition: Does engagement mediate the process?’, Management Research Review,
vol.41, no.8, pp.902–919, viewed 25 April 2021, < >
Skansi, D 2000, “Relation of managerial efficiency and leadership styles – empirical study in
Hrvatska elektroprivreda”, Management, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 51-67, viewed 28 April 2021.
Tepayakul, R & Rinthaisong, I 2018, ‘Job Satisfaction and Employee Engagement among Human

Resources Staff of Thai Private Higher Education Institutions’, T he Journal of Behavioral Science,
Vol.

13,

Issue

2,

pp.

68-81,

viewed

5

May

2021,

<-

thaijo.org/index.php/IJBS/article/view/109260/101314>.
Albrech, S 2011, ‘Handbook of Employee Engagement: Perspectives, Issues, Research and Practice’,
Human Resource Management International Digest, vol. 19, Issue 7, viewed 5 May 2021, Emerald
Insight database.
Hooi, L 2019, ‘Leveraging human assets for MNCs performance: the role of management
development, human resource system and employee engagement’, The International Journal of
Human Resource Management, viewed 5 May 2021, Taylor & Francis Online database.

Markos, S & Sridevi, S 2010, ‘Employee Engagement: The Key to Improving Performance’,
International

Journal

of

Business

and

Management,

Vol.

5,

No.

12,

pp.

< />
89-96,


Macey, W & Schneider, B 2008, ‘The Meaning of Employee Engagement’, Industrial and
Organizational Psychology, vol. 1, issue 1, pp. 3-30, viewed 5 May 2021, Wiley Online Library
database.

Saks, A & Gruman, J 2014, ‘What Do We Really Know About Employee Engagement?’, Human
Resources Development Quarterly, vol. 25, iss. 2, pp. 155-182, viewed 5 May 2021, Wiley Online
Library database.
Kular, S, Gatenby, M, Rees, C, Soane, E & Truss, K 2008, ‘Employee Engagement: A Literature
Review’,Working Paper Series, Kingston University, United Kingdom, viewed 24 April 2021,
< />Bridger, E 2014, Employee Engagement, Kogan Page, ProQuest Ebook Central database.
Masson, R, Royal, M, Agnew, T & Fine, S 2015, ‘Leveraging Employee Engagement: The Practical
Implications’, Industrial and Organizational Psychology, vol. 1, iss. 1, viewed 5 May 2021,
< />Newman, A, Le, H, North-Samardzic, A & Cohen, M 2019, ‘Moral Disengagement at Work: A
Review and Research Agenda’, Journal of Business Ethics, pp. 1-36, viewed 5 May 2020, ProQuest
Journal database.
Kahn, W 1990, ‘Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work’,
Academy of Management Journal, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 692 ‐724, viewed 5 May 2021, EBSCO database.
Florea, N & Manea, R 2016, ‘LEADERSHIP COMMUNICATION-AN EFFICIENT WAY TO
MOTIVATE HUMAN CAPITAL’, Management & Marketing Journal, vol.14, no.1, viewed 1 May
2021.
Al Khajeh, E.H 2018, ‘Impact of leadership styles on organizational performance.’ Journal of Human
Resources

Management

Research,

2018,

pp.1-10,

viewed

22


April

2021,

<

>.
Rao, B 2010, Management and Organisational Behaviour, 1st, Himalaya Publishing House , viewed
24 April 2021, < >.
Nanjundeswaraswamy, T 2015, ‘Leadership styles and quality of work life in SMEs.’, Management
Science

Letters,

vol.5,

no.1,

pp.65-78,

viewed

>.

24

April

2021,


<


Jones, J 2015, 'Effective Leadership in the 21st Century.', Radiology Management, viewed 21 April
2021, < > .
Alblooshi, M, Shamsuzzaman,, M & Haridy, S 2020, 'The relationship between leadership styles and
organisational innovation : A systematic literature review and narrative synthesis', European Journal
of

Innovation

Management,

viewed

20

April

2021,


com.ezproxy.lib.rmit.edu.au/insight/content/doi/10.1108/EJIM-11-2019-0339/full/html>.
Kepha, O, Mukulu, E & Waititu, G.A., 2014. The influence of recruitment and selection on the
performance of employees in research institutes in Kenya. International Journal of Science and
Research, 3(5), pp.132-138, viewed 25 April 2021,< />doi=10.1.1.565.6094&rep=rep1&type=pdf >.
Papadopoulos, P & Ezziane & Z 2020, 'Managing Expats and Their Effectiveness: A Comparative
Study', Journal of Intercultural Management, p. 138-157, viewed 29 April 2021, <

>.
Le, A 2019, ‘Vietnam needs to embrace “Doi Moi 4.0” to sustain high quality growth ‘, The World
Bank,

20

March,

viewed

20

April

2021,

< />
release/2019/03/23/vietnam-needs-to-embrace-doi-moi-4-to-sustain-high-quality-growth>.
Hong, T 2009, 'Doi Moi and the Remaking of Vietnam', GlobalAsia, Vol.4, No.3, viewed 21 April
2021,<

/>
tuan >.
Hassi, A & Storti, G 2011, ‘Organizational training across cultures: variations in practices and
attitudes’, Journal of European Industrial Training, viewed 28 April 2021, < >.
Kim, D, Pan, Y & Park, H.S 1998, ‘High ‐versus low ‐Context culture: A comparison of Chinese,
Korean, and American cultures’, Psychology & Marketing, pp.507-521, viewed 27 April 2021, <
>.
Reina, C, Roger, K & Peterson, S 2017, ‘Quitting the Boss? The Role of Manager Influence Tactics
and Employee Emotional Engagement in Voluntary Turnover’, Virginia Commonwealth University,

Vol.

25

issue:

1,

p.

5-18,

viewed

24

April

2021,

<

.
Souba, W. W. 2011, ‘The being of leadership’, Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, vol.6,
pp.1– 11, viewed 26 April 2021.


Kuehne + Nagel 2019, ‘Employee Development’, Kuehne + Nagel, viewed 28 April 2021, <
>.
Mikelyte, R & Milne, A 2016, ‘The role and influence of micro-cultures in long-term care on the

mental health and wellbeing of older people: A scoping review of evidence’, Quality in Ageing and
Older Adults, vol.17, no.3, pp.198–214, viewed 28 April 2021.
du Toit, S, Baldassar, L, Raber, C, Millard, A, Etherton-Beer, C, Buchanan, H, du Toit, D, Collier, L,
Cheung, G, Peri, K, Webb, E, & Lovarini, M 2020, ‘Embracing Cultural Diversity - Leadership
Perspectives on Championing Meaningful Engagement for Residents Living with Advanced
Dementia’, Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, vol.35, no.1, pp.49–67, viewed 1 May 2021, <
>


Appendices

Figure 1. Overview of moral disengagement research, 2019

Figure 2. Kuehne + Nagel’s “Learning at KN'' completed training sessions (Kuene + Nagel 2018).




×