ĐÁNH GIÁ môi TRƯỜNG LAO ĐỘNG rủi RO AT GS CÔNG TY VIỆT NAM và GIẢI PHÁP QUẢN lý đề nghị y tế NHÂN VIÊN

International Master in Environmental Science &
Management - IMES
MASTER THESIS
EVALUATING LABOR ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS
AT GS COMPANY, VIETNAM AND SUGGEST
SOLUTIONS FOR MANAGING EMPLOYEES’
HEALTH”
Instructor: Prof.Sc.D Le Huy Ba
Student: Nguyen Thao Ngoc
URGENCY OF THE THESIS
GENERAL CONTEXT OF THE STUDY
CONTENT AND METHODS
CONTENT
RESEARCH(chị dùng research hay study?)
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION AND PROPOSALS
URGENCY OF THE THESIS
Propose solutions to management
of health employee
CONTRIBUTIONS OF THE THESIS
GENERAL CONTEXT
OF STUDY(chị dùng
study hay research)
1.1. INTRODUCTION ABOUT GS COMPANY
1.2. BATTERY MANUFACTURING PROCESS
1
2
4
4
RESEARCH(hay là Study?)
OBJECTIVES

Statistics on the health and illness of laborers exposed
to lead through retrospective medical records .
Statistical on the results of biochemical tests, clinical
exam for laborer who contact directly and regularly
with the lead .
Propose feasible solutions.
Assessment on environmental risk and
laborers’ health
3
3
Evaluate the risks of labor
environmental quantity(phải dùng quality) and laborers’ health
Survey and measure labor environment
Retrospective method of health exam and
test of quantity ∆ALA urine
Investigation and interview (over 100 workers)
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
4
4
6
THE RESULTS
A. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
B. HEALTH MANAGEMENT
A. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

I. THE REALITY OF LEAD CONTAMINATION
II. THE REALITY OF LABOR ENVIRONMENTAL
CONTAMINATION
1. Data of microclimate and environmental physics
measured at GS Company between 2009 and 2011
Year
Microclimate Light Noise
Samples
reach the
hygiene
standard

Samples
do not
reach the
hygiene
standard

Samples
reach the
hygiene
standard

Samples
do not
reach the
hygiene
standard
Samples
reach the

hygiene
standard

Samples
do not
reach the
hygiene
standard
2009 35 0 35 5 35 0
2010 35 0 35 0 35 0
2011 35 0 35 0 35 4
- Microclimate with 100% Sample reached the Hygiene Standard
- Light: % samples not reach the standard reduced;
- Noise: % of samples not achieve the standard increased from 0 to 11.4%
II. THE REALITY OF LABOR ENVIRONMENTAL
CONTAMINATION
2. Data of weight dust, lead dust, lead gas, acid gas measured from
2009-2011
- The rate % Sample reached the Hygiene Standard: Acid gas with 100%
- The rate % Sample not reach the Hygiene Standard
Lead dust, lead gas : 100%,
Dust weight: be increasing.
II. THE REALITY OF LABOR ENVIRONMENTAL
CONTAMINATION
3. Chart of monitoring elements at the labor environment
exceed the standard from 2009 to 2011
% exceed
the
Hygiene
Standard

Lead dust and
lead vapor from
2009 to 2011 %
samples not
reach the
Standard did not
change
4. Conclusion about the reality of labor environmental
pollution
Noise: increase
Light: decrease
Weight dust, lead dust,
lead gas: increase
The rate
% Sample
not reach
the
Hygiene
Standard
The
ability of
lead
poisoning
is very
high
Acid gas: 100%
The rate
%
Sample
reached

the
Hygiene
Standard
III. EVALUATE THE RISKS OF LABOR
ENVIRONMENT
1. Results of lead gas and lead vapor
concentration measured at GS Company
from 2009-2011
Source: Nguyen Thao Ngoc and coworkers at Binh Duong Centre of labor Health and
Environment &Institutes of Hygiene – Public Medical in Hochiminh City
1. Lead dust: 100% samples exceed the allowed
Hygiene Standard with the reliability α = 0,10.
2. Lead vapor: 60% samples exceed the
allowed Hygiene Standard with the reliability α
= 0,10.
III. EVALUATE THE RISKS OF LABOR
ENVIRONMENT
2. Chart of lead gas concentration exceed the
standard from 2009-2011
III. EVALUATE THE RISKS OF LABOR
ENVIRONMENT
Polluted level
Contaminant

2009 2010 2011
Weight dust
L L H
Lead vapor
L M H
Lead dust

H H H
3. The level of contaminating caused by weight
dust, lead gas, and lead dust from 2009-2011
H: high risk
M:average
risk
L: low risk
B.HEALTH MANAGEMENT
I. MANAGE THE HEALTH AT THE
BEGINNING
Recruitment employees, Company requires: 100%
employees have full:
1 – Health Certificate issued by the authorities
2 - ΔALA urine test at the Company
II. MANAGING EMPLOYEES’ HEALTH
1. The result of periodically health examine at GS
Company
- Percentage % as per the health classification of
employee did not fluctuate considerably.
2. Statistics on disease situation of employees through
periodically health examine.
-
Periodontal disease occupied the highest rate
→ respiratory tract is the primary route of exposure.
II. MANAGING EMPLOYEES’ HEALTH
3. Survey and interview results
A. Awareness of the environmental factors affecting
health is temperature highest rate.
B. The illness reality of employees during the first six
months of the year is backache highest rate .

C. Employees’ awareness in using personal protective
equipment from 70-100%

Source: Nguyen Thao Ngoc interviewed over 110 employees at GS Company in 2012
III. ASSESS THE RISKS OF EMPLOYEES’
HEALTH
A. The result of occupational disease exam through quantitive
∆ALA urine from 2009 to 2011
2. The percentage of inorganic lead exposure has been
decreased from 2009-2011: 3.53%→1.46% → 1.18%.
Source: Retrospect data at Binh Duong Centre of labor health and environment from 2009-2011
III. ASSESS THE RISKS OF EMPLOYEES’
HEALTH
People exposed
with lead
Total
Following exposure Exposure
Frequency Percentage
(%)
Frequency Percentage
(%)
Directly
317 28 8.83 4 1.26
Indirectly
22 0 0 0 0
B. The chart to compare the lead infection rate of
people who contact directly and indirectly with lead
2011
Comment: Rate the directly department exposed to lead
higher than the department is not directly exposed to lead

Source: Retrospect data at Binh Duong Centre of labor health and environment from 2009-2011
IV. THE REALITY OF HEALTH, ILLNESS OF
EMPLOYEES
Company :
 Protected employees’ health good
Equipped the personal protective equipment for
workers good
 Awareness of health protection for themselves is high.
 Reducing the rate of inorganic lead infection over time
from 2009 to 2011.
IV. THE REALITY OF HEALTH, ILLNESS OF
EMPLOYEES
Company

Occupational illness for employees

Discovering the occupational diseases soon.

Minimize the cause of career illness.