Journal of Science 2015, Vol. 5 (1), 80 91 An Giang University
80
NG CA YU T NN S I VI
HOI HC
Linh Giang
1
1
ThS. P Khnh Chng, ng i hc An Giang
Thông tin chung:
18/06/14
n kt qu t:
27/09/14
p nh 03/15
Title:
Internal factors affecting
towards
training and education of a
university
Từ khóa:
Yu t ni sinh, s
c
Keywords:
Internal factors, student
satisfaction, personal
characteristics of students
ABSTRACT
This study aimed to examine internal
Theoretical models have first conducted at An Giang University (AGU) via a
mixed method of qualitative and quantitative research and the participation of
491 2012-2013. The finding showed that there is a
and the following factors: (1)
student needs, (2) internal and external personality of students, (3) current
addresses of students, (4)
background education, and (8) stu
cost.
T
c thc hin nhu t ni sinh n
s c kim chng
li h
c thc hi
c ti hc 2012 2013. Kt qu
gia kt qu i
yu t v: (1) nhu cng nng ngoi, (3)
ch hin ti c
nghip b, (6) ngh nghip m hc vn ca m, (8) mc sng ca
1. T V
i h
nhu cu th ng s
p v u ca
ng s dc
H ng Quc Bo,
nhu cu ca
(SV) s t trong nh m
bo s i hc, bi l
hiu qu co ph thuc rt nhiu
i hc. Vi
a t xem l
m
nhng thu m tin s u
ch u t ng chc
ng lc mnh m
n Ng, 2000).
Nhu c i tt yi thy
cn th tn tn. Nhu cu bao
gi u g i
u
tr y con i hong
nhng tng (Nguyn Quang Un,
Nguy
th, nng cung cp dch v o tha
i hc s to cho h
c ng cnh
h mnh trong hc t
trin.
Li i mng nhu cu
c s th ng nhau? Theo kt
Journal of Science 2015, Vol. 5 (1), 80 91 An Giang University
81
qu c cho
rng, m u th
, m t ki
n
Quang Un, Nguy,
a ch i
ki ng ki
i t
ng nng ngo
hai ki
cht ca phn n
nh cm (Hans Eysenck
theo , a
kit qu cm nh
v ch o c
d p nh n sn
phm/dch v ng cung cp. T cm nhn
ch quan ca tng SV v cho ca
t s SV cm th
sn phm/dch v nhc.
2. T
QUAN
u t v gii. Mt
s u cho r t
gia kt qu n yu t
gii sinh hc (Aleamoni, L.M., 1998),
(Young, S. & Rush, L.; Shaw, D., 2009), (Lally &
Myhill, o, 2007), (Cashin,
W.E., t s u li cho
rng yu t gin s
(Hancock et al.,1992; Tatro, 1995 theo Young, S.
& Rush, L.; Shaw, D., 2009) cho thy SV n
giGV)
nzi et al., 1993 theo Muhammad
Nauman Abbasi, 2011). u t
s tri nghim ca SV khi hc tng. Mt s
u cho rng yu t c ca SV
n kt qu (Cashin,
W.E., 1995); (Lally & Myhill, 1994 theo L
Ho, t s u li
cho r t trong kt qu
n yu t (Dalton, H & Denson,
N., 2009); (Aleamoni, L. M., 1998); (Cisneros-
Cohernour, E. J., 2001); (Muhammad Nauman
Abbasi, 2011). Kt qu u cho thy
l thun v
hc ca h.
u t v kt qu hc tp. SV
s p nh m thp
(Crumbley, Henry & Kratchman, 2001 theo
Dalton, H & Denson, N., 2009),
cu cho rm d n nhn
p t SV (Abrami, Dickens &
Perry Leventhal, 1980 theo Mckeachie.W.J,
u cho r
m gi
ct qu ln SV (Lally & Myhill,
1994 theo o, 2007).
u t
u c
nh rng s
t trong nhng
yu t quan trng ca s
c. Eweli
t qu hc tp ca SV (Ewell, 1989,
Pascarella & Terenzini, 1991, Umbach & Porter,
2002 theo Muhammad Nauman Abbasi, 2011).
Cashin, W.E. cho rng GV d i
ng c t
y l
y l, 1995). M
, 2002 theo Muhammad
Nauman Abbasi, 2011).
t qu u ra ca SV
ng, vi
th u t v nh
n kt qu a SV.
Chng h n tu
m ra, s a SV ph
thuc nhit qu xp loi hc li vi
t qu xp loi hc lc
n v i
v
u
t v gic, v
c ng (BC College & Institute Student
Outcome, 2003).
tp
Journal of Science 2015, Vol. 5 (1), 80 91 An Giang University
82
trung nhiu t m
i, s tri nghim ca
SV khi hc t), kt
qu hc t
ng cu t nhu cu
n s a h trong
c tp tng.
T
3.1 Quan h cu
3.1.1 Thuyt nhu cu ca Abraham Maslow
u ca Maslow ch yu tp
c nhu ct
ng d thuyt sau: (1)
Nhu c tng l
khi mt nhu cc tho
ng lc quan tr ny sinh mt nhu
cu m thay th cho nhu cu
b xut hin khi nhu cu bc thp
c th
bi nhu cu bc thp; (3) Nhu
cu ca phn l c t
trin t thn cao.
u ca Abraham Maslow
Bn cht ca s th cht
ng sn phm hay dch v mang li cho
ng ca nhu c
ng vi tr i
c m
c cho thy
s bng cn
ca nhu cng vt ra
u cao.
ca thuyt nhu cu c
Nhu cu
Maslow
Nhu cu
i mong mun
c
s
quan h i.
t. SV c m b u
king, c th:
ng;
K
cu v
Ch bo hich v c khe cho
SV.
Nhu cu i
Nhu cu, mong mun
i b
u giao
ti
Ho, th dc th thao),
c b
c tng dy hc
tp;
c tip vi Hi
Ch nhi phn hng cng.
Nhu cc ng
i x
ng, tin cc
Khen ngi kp tht sc nhim v hc
tp;
Ln SV;
Ch phc v cho SV.
Nhu cu t khnh
Nhu cu, mong mun
c th
hi
c m
c ghi nhn.
Khuy ch trong hc tu;
kh o, tng hp v ng dng
kin thc t cuc sng.
Journal of Science 2015, Vol. 5 (1), 80 91 An Giang University
83
3.1.2 Thuy
ng yu t to ra s a
o s
sinh/yu t bo v sc khe (Hygiene factors).
u t tho ra s
s
Herzberrg theo Nguy, 2008).
Herzberrg:
Herzberrg
Quan h
t
(Motivation). Na hai yu t
c vn dng giu
a SV.
M tr
SV - mt c c
cho thy s t c
c cho
thy s
c
cu
To s duy
Khoa/L
T
3.1.3 Thuya E.C.Tolman
Theo E.C.Tolman, yu t n t k th
nghi , nh
c.
n dng hc thuy a
y, s
Yu t nhu
cu
t
Yu t nhu
cu
to s
Journal of Science 2015, Vol. 5 (1), 80 91 An Giang University
84
SV (E.C.Tolman theo Phan Trng Ng, 2003).
ng hc t
d p
nh
3.2 t
Nhu ci tt y n
tn trong nhu kin nh
m, nhu cu
c i ca SV
u hc tp,
t cho, gi vt cht, trang
thit b, dch v h tr) v u king
o c h tr i
thi (nhu cu) ca
i s c cng
s n cho h s a to
h phu trong hc tu
Abrah
m
p nh
Ki
u
NG
Journal of Science 2015, Vol. 5 (1), 80 91 An Giang University
85
KIU
NHU CU
ng
ni
ng
ngoi
ng
ng
Tha
th
(2
1
)
(2
2
)
(1
11
)
(1
22
)
(1
2
)
(1
1
)
(1)
(2)
(22)].
t
Journal of Science 2015, Vol. 5 (1), 80 91 An Giang University
86
3.3 thuyu
4. KT QU O LUN
4.1 ng ca nhu cn s a
SV
Kt qu ki nh m gia nhu cu
nhu cu tng ni
ng
SV nhu cu cao v nc h
nhu cu tng n
nm trong kho<
nhu thp v nc hi)
thuyt H0: M
a SV tng ni dun
m v
nhau):
Bng 3: H s a nhu c
Mi quan h
H s y
M
Nhu cu v p, thng nht c
<-
-0,17
0,080
Nhu cu v ng dng c
<-
-0,203
0,088
Nhu cu v u
<- GT,
TLHT
-0,079
0,080
Nhu cu v nu hc tp
<- GT,
TLHT
-0,087
0,078
Nhu cu v cho
<-
-0,036
0,086
m
Nhu cu
Ki
ng nng ngoi
Thang m
H
1
H
2
H
3
1. i
hc & hin ti)
2. V
3. Ngh nghip b m
4. hc vn b m
5. Mc sng
H
4
1. o
2. u hc tp
3. NC3. T cho
4. NC4. Gi
5. t b
6. NC6. Dch v h tr
1. Gi
2. Tui sinh hc
3. o
4. M p
5. Kt qu hc tp
6. M ng
ngo
1.
2. y
3. n
4.
Journal of Science 2015, Vol. 5 (1), 80 91 An Giang University
87
Mi quan h
H s y
M
Nhu cu v
<-
-0,103
0,093
Nhu cu v phm chm GV
<- GV
0,036
0,077
Nhu cu v a GV
<-ng v GV
0,200
0,071
Nhu cu v PPGD ca GV
<- GV
0,157
0,083
Nhu cu v PP kia GV
<- GV
0,106
0,075
Nhu cu v c/Ging
<- CSVC,
TTB
0,213
0,107
Nhu cu v ghim
<- CSVC,
TTB
-0,307
0,236
Nhu cu v n
<- CSVC,
TTB
0,131
0,084
Nhu cu v
<- CSVC,
TTB
-0,696
0,040
Nhu cu v
<- CSVC,
TTB
-0,183
0,188
Nhu cu v chng h tr
<- DVHT
0,536
0,130
Nhu cu v c v c
<- DVHT
-0,067
0,098
Kt qu kinh 06 gi thuyt v m
gia nhu c a SV ta thy:
i dung cho kt qu ki nh gi
thuyc chp nhn (m
gia nhu cu v: (1)
c/gi
nghit
ng h tr vi s x
u thit y u mong
mu c
tp tp v
thuy H
cu t to
s ng ch mang li cho SV
c
i ca
Frederick Herzberrg).
i dung cho kt qu ki nh gi
thuyt H0 b b v tin c
+ 05/13 n s
thng trong khong t [0,036;
thun gia
nhu cu v: (1) phm ch m GV; (2)
a GV; (3)
ging dy (PPGD) ca GV; (4)
kin vi s
i
u cao v m
thu
th
thu t rt nhi
vm chm GV;
a GV; PPGD ca GV; PP
ki n, n c
ng t cm thy th
p vt
Hi v
nhu c
Frederick Herzberrg nc th to ra
i ca
Fr kim ch
n m t
qu lch chun cho th
u cng
mc tt nhng trong khong [3,69 ;
3,81].
+ 08/13 n s
thng trong khong t [- 0,695; -
nghch
gia nhu cu vp, thng nht ca
ng dng c3)
u; (4) n
Journal of Science 2015, Vol. 5 (1), 80 91 An Giang University
88
u hc t ch
t
c v c . Kim
tra m ng c ng
nhu cy ta thy:
Bng 4. Kt qu th ng c
ng y < 0
Nhu cu
M ng ca
ng
lch
chun
p, thng nht
c
3,56
0,61
ng dng ca
3,54
0,63
T
liu
3,60
0,69
Nu
hc tp
3,55
0,66
cho
3,58
0,70
3,70
0,63
3,55
0,68
c v c
b
3,40
0,78
Kt qu Bng 4 cho thu
ng th
y y, nhu cao, nu
ng mc th cm thy
c li, u
th bi nhng
c th cm th
y, kt qu ki thuyt v nhu
cu SV vi s y m nhu cu
n s ng thi,
kt qu u cho th u cu
t hai yu t Frederick Herzberrg
p v
thuy xuc kim chng ln 1.
4.2 ng ca ki ng
nng ngon s a SV
Kt qu kh u 491 SV cho th
180 SV thuc king n
la chn ki n ho
thuc king nc
ki ng ngo a chn
ki c
ki ng ngoi, theo: Nguyn Quang
Un et al., 2011). Kt qu kinh m
gia king nng ngo
ng 5 (Gi thuyt
H0: Ki ng nng ngoi
vi m ca SV):
Bng 5. H s a ki
Mi quan h
H s
M
King nng ngoi
<-
164,700
0,000
<- GT, TLHT
20,270
0,000
<-
20,762
0,000
<- GV
27,008
0,000
<- CSVC, TTB
8,312
0,081
<- DVHT
491,000
0,000
Kt qu kinh 06 gi thuyt v m
gia ki ng nng ngo
gi thuyt u b
(m
h gia king nng ngo
m a SV.
Kt qu Bng 5 cho th
ng nu
ng ngop vi thuy
ng gng
i vi h. H s ng d
ch t v
t ch
t qu cho thy s
Journal of Science 2015, Vol. 5 (1), 80 91 An Giang University
89
a SV ph thu
ng nng ngoa tng
kin m d
chp nhn v sn phm/dch v ng cung
cp.
Bng 6. Kt qu ths ng nng ngo tng n
Ni dung
ng ni
ng ngoi
o
38
142
248
63
u hc tp
70
110
174
137
T cho
60
120
163
148
Gi
69
111
182
129
vt cht, trang thit b
83
97
185
126
Dch v h tr
0
180
311
0
Tng
180 SV
311 SV
Qua kt qu thc t
a SV trong mi quan h vi nhu c
ki ng ni /hng ngoi ta thy:
17 thu ng hc tp
i hu
thi vu
ng nu th
king ngo
ng ngot ra
ng ni
ng lc t
cu tng ni
l l
ho o t ng cung cp.
c l i v
ng ngoi, t l
l hoo cng.
Kt qu u thc t p vi
t. Theo thuy h ca
Hans Eysenck, mi ki c
ng n
p nhn sn phm/dch
v ng cung c l
h
i vi h. H s ng d t
v t chi
chp nhn sn phm/dch v ng cung cp,
l t qu thc nghi
ch
p.
4.3 Kt qu ki thuy
Kt qu ki thuyc
o, tn sut
tham gia lp hc, kt qu hc tp, c
c, ch hin ti, th bc con trong gia
nghip b m b m, mc chi
ng
ngo i m c
ng 7.
Bng 7. Tng hp kt qu ki thuyt H3
Bi vi
m a SV
Bi
h vi m
ca SV
Ch hin ti ca SV
Gi
Th bc con trong gia
a SV
o
Ngh nghip b
Tn sut tham gia lp hc
Ngh nghip m
Kt qu hc tp
hc vn ca m
hc
M
ca SV
hc vn ca b
Chc v m nhn
M t
ng ngoa SV
y, qua kt qu gia yu t
i kt qu
ho o trong
ng, ta nhn thy s i
vi ho thu
Journal of Science 2015, Vol. 5 (1), 80 91 An Giang University
90
gio, (3) m
tham gia lp hc, (4) kt qu hc t
hc vn ca b,
(7) chc v m nhn, (8) m tham gia
ng ngoa SV.
i vu t
kh n s a SV
nhng cung c
u ki
u hc tp; t ch
t b h tr; dch v h tr
i vi mng SV. Th hai,
khi trio theo hc ch c
qu
t hc phn (n
nh v m hn ch m
n khai
u b mang
n nhi ba, khi
trin khai theo hc ch
lc t hc, t u ca SV rt quan trng
ng n kt qu hc tp c,
ng cn cung c u hc
t c hiu qu. Th
u t m
s/kt qu hc t ng, b
i vi SV
n chung v ng din
ng h
c th a th
t qu
u t
n kt qu
ch hin ti ca SV, (2) v
ca SV, (3) ngh nghip b, (4) ngh nghip m,
hc vn ca m, (6) mc sng ca
t s yu
t ng hc tp ca
i h ng hc
tp c
cho cu
i trong thuyt c
Albert Bandura, h cho r
quan tra
5. KT LUN
Mu
t ni sinh n s a SV, c
th nh
ng cn s
c
thuy
m cho
u v i Vit Nam, bi hin
nay, Vi
m ng ca yu t n s
a h i vi ho o. Tuy
u ch mi thc hin t ng
i ha
kt qu s b hn ch c bin
p trong x ng th
m n
trong c
ng th u t nh
.
U THAM KHO
Aleamoni, L. M. (1998). Student Rating Myths Versus
Research Facts From 1924 to 1998. The University
of Arizona Tucson.
Assessment of Academic Institution as Basic for
Successful Achievement of their Satisfaction.
Center for Quality, Faculty of Mechanical
Engineering, University of Kragujecvac.
BC College & Institute Student Outcomes. (2003).
Understanding student satisfaction. ISSN 1492-
3718, Vol.3, Num.1.
Retrieved from
n (Ch ng Quc
Bo. (2006). Qu c t
bi hm.
Cashin, W.E. (1995). Student Ratings of Teaching: The
Research Revisited. IDEA Paper No. 32.
Dalton, H; Denson, N. (2009). Student evaluation: what
predicts satisfaction. The 32nd HERDSA Annual
Conference, Darwin.
Koviljka Banjecvic, Aleksandra Nastasic. (2010).
Methodological Approach: Students
Linh Giang. (2013). ng ca u t
nn s a SV i vi hong
i hc Ti Vim bo
chc.
Muhammad Nauman Abbasi. (2011). A Study on
Student Satisfaction in Pakistani Universities: The
Case of Bahauddin Zakariya University, Pakistan.
Asian Social Science. Vol.7 No.7, 209-219.
(Ch . (2007). Nhng trc
nghi p 2 Trc nghim v .
t bi hm.
Journal of Science 2015, Vol. 5 (1), 80 91 An Giang University
91
Nguyn Th M L Kim Thoa & Tr
c
xut bi hc Qui.
Nguyn Ng
Nt bi hc Quc gia
Nguyn Quang Un (Ch
i
. Ni: t b i h m.