Tải bản đầy đủ (.pdf) (35 trang)

Vai trò của ICD ở người bệnh sau nhồi máu cơ tim

Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (10.55 MB, 35 trang )

Role Of ICD Post-MI Patients
With Heart Failure

Anil Saxena
Director & Clinical Head
Cardiac Pacing & Electrophysiology
Fortis Escorts Heart Institute, New Delhi INDIA


VT After MI: Anatomy of Scar




Underlying Arrhythmia of Sudden Death

Primary
VF

8%

Torsades
de Pointes

13%

VT

Bradycardia

62%



Adapted from Bayés de Luna A. Am Heart J. 1989;117:151-159.

17%


Sudden Cardiac Death


Sudden Cardiac Death
The Chain Of Survival



Time to Defibrillation

• Recognize cardiac arrest
• Activate emergency response
• Call hospital / ambulance
• Medical help arrives on scene
• Locate victim and shock
• Total Elapsed Time

1 min

1 min
1 min

10 min
2 min

15 min


ICD: Placement


Implantable Cardioverter
Defibrillator


MADIT II Trial Design
Documented
Prior MI

Selection

LVEF <30%

Consent &
Randomisation


Enrolment

No ICD

ICD

Follow-up
@ 3 months

Monitor Rx

End Points

Follow-up



Status: Completed in 2001
First trial to show the life-saving
benefits of ICDs without
requiring patients to have a
documented history of abnormal
heart rhythms


Results
Mortality over an average follow-up of 20 months

31% reduction in the risk of death at
any interval among patients in the
defibrillator group as compared with
patients in the conventional-therapy group

The cumulative survival curves represent
a decrease in death rates in the defibrillator
group (95% confidence limits; P-value) of
12% at 1 year (27 to 40%), 28% at 2 years (4
to 46%), and 29% at 3 years (5 to 46%).



Additional Results – MADIT II 8-Year Data
Mortality over an average of 7.6 years* post-enrollment
Cumulative Probability of Mortality (n=1232)
ICD

No ICD (Conventional Therapy)

49%

62%

• 34% relative reduction in the
risk of death at any interval among
patients with a defibrillator as
compared with patients without an
ICD
• Number needed to treat (NNT)
• 8 at 8 years
• 17 at 2 years
• Analysis showed sustained benefit
with primary ICD therapy in the
MADIT II study population
*median

Circ 2010; 122: 1265-1271

Hazard Ratio (95% CI)

p-value


0.66 (0.56-0.78)

<0.001




Indications for ICD Therapy
Class I (Post MI)

• ICD therapy is indicated in patients with previous
MI and spontaneous sustained VT, whether
hemodynamically stable or unstable
(Level of Evidence: A)



Prior MI



Spontaneous sustained VT



Hemodynamically stable or unstable


Indications for ICD Therapy

Class I (Post MI)

• ICD therapy is recommended for patients with prior
MI who are at least 40 days post-MI, have an LVEF
less than 35%, are NYHA functional class II or III.
(Level of Evidence: A)



Prior MI, at least 40 days post MI



LVEF <35%



NYHA functional class II or III


Indications for ICD Therapy
Class I (Post MI)

• ICD therapy is recommended for patients with

prior MI who are at least 40 days post-MI, have an
LVEF less than 30%, are NYHA functional class I
(Level of Evidence: A)




Prior MI, at least 40 days post MI



LVEF <30%



NYHA functional class I


Indications for ICD Therapy
Class I (Post MI)

• ICD therapy is indicated in patients with

nonsustained VT due to prior MI, LVEF less than or
equal to 40%, and inducible VF or sustained VT at
electrophysiological study
(Level of evidence B)


Prior MI, Non-sustained VT



LVEF <40%




Inducible VF or sustained VT on EP study


Indications for ICD Therapy
Class I (Post MI)

• ICD therapy is indicated in patients with syncope of
undetermined origin with clinically relevant,
hemodynamically significant sustained VT or VF
induced at electrophysiological study
(Level of Evidence: B)


Prior MI, history of syncope



LVEF - Any EF



Hemodynamically unstable VT on EP study


What Changes Could Be Done?

• More inclusions by identifying clinical situations
which cause SCD risk



Less than 40 day Post MI patients with low EF

• Less liberal guidelines by better risk stratification


Primary prevention population (some may not be
benefitting)


Case

• 54 year male presents with acute anterior MI
• Has sustained VT at 36 hours, DC shock given
• Revascularization NOT done/possible/available
• LVEF 25%



Secondary Prevention: CAD—VF or Hemodynamically
Unstable VT Associated With Acute (<48 h) MI
Single or Recurrent VF or
Polymorphic VT With Acute
(<48 Hours) MI

Total
revascularization
completed

No revascularization

indicated

Not amenable to
revascularization


×